New york times ad

[glugglug]

http://impeachbush.pephost.org/site/DocServer?docID=221

It would be funny if the number of people petitioning to impeach him exceeds his vote count.

 

[LtPage1]

yes, it would be funny, but theyve gotta change that- ashcroft just resigned.

 

[Genx87]

Doubt it would happen. You had your chance to impeach him on Nov 2nd and failed.

 

[bunnyfubbles]

Originally posted by: Genx87
Doubt it would happen. You had your chance to impeach him on Nov 2nd and failed.

 

[Kanalua]

Originally posted by: Genx87
Doubt it would happen. You had your chance to impeach him on Nov 2nd and failed.

George W. Bush Must Answer to the People

You think these guys are missing something...









...wait for it...

 

[raildogg]

Bush won, you libs lost. Big time. Give it a rest.

Maybe you guys will only lose by a million popular votes in 08, not by the overwhelming number Bush won by.

 

[CADsortaGUY]

Originally posted by: raildogg
Bush won, you libs lost. Big time. Give it a rest.

Maybe you guys will only lose by a million popular votes in 08, not by the overwhelming number Bush won by.

They won't get that close if they don't stop acting like children throwing a tantrum because they didn't get what they wanted...

CsG

 

[XZeroII]

Lord, what is wrong with you people? Now you want to try and circumvent the electorial process? Bush won. Fair and square. The losing team has admitted defeat.

I can't believe there are so many people who don't believe in electing a leader. :|

 

[b0mbrman]

Originally posted by: XZeroII
Lord, what is wrong with you people? Now you want to try and circumvent the electorial process? Bush won. Fair and square. The losing team has admitted defeat.

I can't believe there are so many people who don't believe in electing a leader. :|

Yes, but when that elected leader is the one I didn't vote for, it makes sense to try to impeach him

 

[Pliablemoose]

Originally posted by: XZeroII
Lord, what is wrong with you people? Now you want to try and circumvent the electorial process? Bush won. Fair and square. The losing team has admitted defeat.

I can't believe there are so many people who don't believe in electing a leader. :|

At least they haven't killed him yet...

 

[charrison]

Originally posted by: b0mbrman

Originally posted by: XZeroII
Lord, what is wrong with you people? Now you want to try and circumvent the electorial process? Bush won. Fair and square. The losing team has admitted defeat.

I can't believe there are so many people who don't believe in electing a leader. :|

Yes, but when that elected leader is the one I didn't vote for, it makes sense to try to impeach him

huh?

 

[slyedog]

only a handfull of people in america want to deny bush won the election. and nine out of the ten
post on this forum...poor libs

 

[PnNLurker]

Originally posted by: raildogg
Bush won, you libs lost. Big time. Give it a rest.

Maybe you guys will only lose by a million popular votes in 08, not by the overwhelming number Bush won by.

Hopefully the traditional republicans will take back the GOP and give us a a decent choice in 08! I can dream. Someone who trusts in God but knows where to draw the line. There is too much church talk in the same breath as government talk lately for my taste. One thing I hate more than anything and will turn me off to church quicker than anything, is having to listen to my pastor talk about Bush on Sunday. If he wants to talk politics on Sunday, the church should give up their tax exempt status imo. I think we are in for a lot of close elections for many years to come until the dems and the gop and move towards the center on many key issues.

 

[LordMagnusKain]

Originally posted by: CADsortaGUY

Originally posted by: raildogg
Bush won, you libs lost. Big time. Give it a rest.

Maybe you guys will only lose by a million popular votes in 08, not by the overwhelming number Bush won by.

They won't get that close if they don't stop acting like children throwing a tantrum because they didn't get what they wanted...

CsG

well, the south should just leave the union!

Yes, but when that elected leader is the one I didn't vote for, it makes sense to try to impeach him

WTF?~!

At least they haven't killed him yet..

talk about a hate crime.

Hopefully the traditional republicans will take back the GOP and give us a a decent choice in 08!

it'll be McKain vs. Hillary.

If he wants to talk politics on Sunday, the church should give up their tax exempt status imo

evangelicals don't need to be told "vote for bush" to know that when Kerry said he would support government funds for abortion that he wasn't the person to vote for.

maybe the church should become a 527 would that fix the problem?

 

[wiin]

Posted by b0mbrman

Yes, but when that elected leader is the one I didn't vote for, it makes sense to try to impeach him

So, had kerry won, it would be ok to impeach him?

 

[b0mbrman]

Originally posted by: wiin
Posted by b0mbrman

Yes, but when that elected leader is the one I didn't vote for, it makes sense to try to impeach him

So, had kerry won, it would be ok to impeach him?

Why would the NY Times want to impeach Kerry?

 

[lordtyranus]

Originally posted by: wiin
Posted by b0mbrman

Yes, but when that elected leader is the one I didn't vote for, it makes sense to try to impeach him

So, had kerry won, it would be ok to impeach him?

Nope, the liberal media wouldn't have it so.

 

[BBond]

Originally posted by: raildogg
Bush won, you libs lost. Big time. Give it a rest.

Maybe you guys will only lose by a million popular votes in 08, not by the overwhelming number Bush won by.

Two percentage points, 3.5 million votes out of over 117 million cast, isn't "big time" or an "overwhelming number" by any stretch of the imagination. Unless you live in Bushworld where the imagination is permanently stretched.

51% is the bare minimum to establish plurality.

 

[b0mbrman]

Originally posted by: raildogg
Bush won, you libs lost. Big time. Give it a rest.

Maybe you guys will only lose by a million popular votes in 08, not by the overwhelming number Bush won by.

We lost by 140,000...

 

[charrison]

Originally posted by: BBond

Originally posted by: raildogg
Bush won, you libs lost. Big time. Give it a rest.

Maybe you guys will only lose by a million popular votes in 08, not by the overwhelming number Bush won by.

Two percentage points, 3.5 million votes out of over 117 million cast, isn't "big time" or an "overwhelming number" by any stretch of the imagination. Unless you live in Bushworld where the imagination is permanently stretched.

51% is the bare minimum to establish plurality.

And it is the first time a majority has been reached in many elections. Add that to a republican sweep in the house/senate and there really is a mandate for change.

ANd if Kerry was elected I would not be calling for his impeachment because I did not vote for him.

 

[charrison]

Originally posted by: b0mbrman

Originally posted by: raildogg
Bush won, you libs lost. Big time. Give it a rest.

Maybe you guys will only lose by a million popular votes in 08, not by the overwhelming number Bush won by.

We lost by 140,000...

You lost by alot more than that.

 

[DevilsAdvocate]

Originally posted by: charrison

Originally posted by: b0mbrman

Originally posted by: raildogg
Bush won, you libs lost. Big time. Give it a rest.

Maybe you guys will only lose by a million popular votes in 08, not by the overwhelming number Bush won by.

We lost by 140,000...

You lost by alot more than that.

He's talking about Ohio. Funny how the popular vote does not matter anymore.

 

[gsaldivar]

Originally posted by: bunnyfubbles

Originally posted by: Genx87
Doubt it would happen. You had your chance to impeach him on Nov 2nd and failed.

 

[BBond]

Originally posted by: DevilsAdvocate

Originally posted by: charrison

Originally posted by: b0mbrman

Originally posted by: raildogg
Bush won, you libs lost. Big time. Give it a rest.

Maybe you guys will only lose by a million popular votes in 08, not by the overwhelming number Bush won by.

We lost by 140,000...

You lost by alot more than that.

He's talking about Ohio. Funny how the popular vote does not matter anymore.

Now, that's hilarious.

Did the popular vote matter when Bush lost by over 546,000 votes in 2000???

:roll:

 

[glugglug]

Originally posted by: DevilsAdvocate

Originally posted by: charrison

Originally posted by: b0mbrman

Originally posted by: raildogg
Bush won, you libs lost. Big time. Give it a rest.

Maybe you guys will only lose by a million popular votes in 08, not by the overwhelming number Bush won by.

We lost by 140,000...

You lost by alot more than that.

He's talking about Ohio. Funny how the popular vote does not matter anymore.

If ALL the states get recounted, not just the "critical" ones, I think you'll find that Bush lost the popular vote by about 5 million.