You want states where they can try people until they get the verdict they want? You think that is what states' rights are about?
You don't even know what this is about.
Let me explain how things are, not how you wish them to be. This is not about trying people over and over, this is about the differences between governmental divisions as outlined in the Constitution. If an act is committed in NY and it is a violation of federal law then that person can be prosecuted by say, the SDNY. But under the Constitution if the act is a crime UNDER STATE LAW AS WELL then that person can be tried in state court. THIS IS HOW IT IS ALREADY.
BUT
NY decided that IT, NOT ANY OTHER ENTITY, would not do what IT IS ENTITLED TO AND HAS BEEN. That was corrected and I'll go all caps again because this might work.
EVERY STATE HAS THE INHERENT RIGHT TO PROSECUTE ACTS THAT ARE CRIMINAL ACCORDING TO STATE LAW whether the Feds prosecute or not. This is the absolute right of a state and NY has decided to not limit it's LAWFUL CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHTS and opt to decide what to do without a blanket exception.
NO STATE CAN TRY FOR A VIOLATION IN ANOTHER and ONCE THE TRIAL IN THE STATE WHERE THAT VIOLATION IS ADJUDICATED THEY CANNOT BE TRIED AGAIN FOR THE SAME OFFENCE.
There is no "over and over until we get what we want", this is plugging the loophole THAT NY ITSELF CREATED.
You have no clue about the issue, the law, or the Constitution nor how it's been done in our system for ages.
Ignorance is your bliss, but it is ignorance.
Debate me on the law, I dare you.