People like you see conspiracies everywhere("left" is anyone that disagrees with your small view of the world).
Conspiracy not found. It's a simple statistic that for some reason infuriates certain people.
People like you see conspiracies everywhere("left" is anyone that disagrees with your small view of the world).
Conspiracy not found. It's a simple statistic that for some reason infuriates certain people.
Paul, Julius. 1965. Three Generations of Imbeciles Are Enough: State Eugenic Sterilization Laws in American Thought and Practice.
Unpublished manuscript. Washington, D.C.: Walter Reed Army Institute of Research.
You do realize that an Abortion doesn't prevent you from ever carrying a child again, right?
Are you really trying to suggest that Black women aborting their children is some type of Eugenics plot?
Are you really trying to suggest that Black women aborting their children is some type of Eugenics plot?
Not that minorities are part of the plot, but that minorities have fallen for the plot. Society has decayed to the point where poor minority children are better off being aborted than born.
Don't you mean that conservatives have gnawed at the societal safety nets so long and so hard that poor minority children are better off being aborted than born?
I respectfully disagree.
Welfare should not be a way of life. There are families out there who have been on welfare for generations. That kind of stuff needs to stop.
Not that minorities are part of the plot, but that minorities have fallen for the plot. Society has decayed to the point where poor minority children are better off being aborted than born.
Just as with the eugenics program society will make an excuse why those children should not be born. They will end up on welfare, they will get into drugs, they will bog the system down.
Excuses that were used to justify the eugenics program of the 20th century are being used in this thread.
If financial impact was the primary reason for ending the pregnancy, is there more we as a society can do to help minorities? Maybe provide better housing than "the projects", free college education, free transportation,,,?
What makes you think a low income mother is going to climb the economic ladder by having an abortion?
But on the other hand, with the right support system a single mother with a couple of children will get a free college education. And with that education she will be able to break the chains of poverty.
Abortion is class warfare on the poor. Instead of forced eugenics, just convince poor minorities it is their right to have an abortion.
Because children are extremely expensive and a huge financial setback, especially for the poor?
You understand that many (most?) that support a women's right to choose what to do with a fetus (i.e. not a child) would MUCH prefer to see lower abortion rates due to a much, much better social support system, right?
But Anderson quickly abandoned her illusions of safety once she began work at Planned Parenthood. “I started feeling uneasy working there when people came from national in New York City to teach us the conscious sedation process,” Anderson told the paper. “It was disgusting. These two ladies had this chant they would do: ‘Abortion all the time!’ I thought, ‘I’ve got to get out of here.’ That was about six to eight months after I started.”
They haven’t been disappointed. In 2011, government subsidies to Planned Parenthood reached an all-time high, with the abortion provider receiving a whopping $542 million in taxpayer funding — all while ending a record number of lives — 333,964.
It is equally disturbing that while Planned Parenthood is performing a record number of abortions, their cancer screenings have dropped by 29 percent, and contraceptive services by 12 percent over the past three years.
You have been lied to and you have believed the lie.
http://www.lifesitenews.com/former-...t-was-a-money-grubbing-evil-very-sad-sad.html
You are fucking retarded if you believe something like that.
Typical liberal, ignore the facts when they are right in front of you.
Its from a site called lifesitenews, so there is no chance of it being remotely true.
Also because they are not news sites they are advocacy sites promoting pro-life. They will only tell you what you want to hear. They see one site and copy and past it to theirs, they don't have reporters out checking into a story.
That news article was published on several other websites.
http://www.examiner.com/article/pla...-talked-to-babies-body-parts-during-abortions
http://www.catholic-sf.org/ns.php?newsid=1&id=62228
http://www.breitbart.com/Big-Govern...oney-Grubbing-Evil-Very-Sad-Sad-Place-To-Work
I expect sites like huffpost and cnn to ignore news like that because it does not fit with their liberal agenda.
No, they ignore it because its made up fantasy by someone with an agenda to push and even CNN and Huffpo has some standards.
