Originally posted by: monkey333
my only limitation is a 300 watt PS...
http://picasaweb.google.com/lh...aydVdQ?feat=directlink
Originally posted by: monkey333
so a 300 watt can handle a 4670 and 2 hd's?
edit:Originally posted by: monkey333
i thought the model i bought is pretty decent, and it's .5 months old....
thoughts?
Originally posted by: happy medium
The 4670 uses 70 watts the 2600xt uses 49 watts, and the x800xl uses 49 watts.
http://archive.atomicmpc.com.a...ums.asp?s=2&c=7&t=9354
The 3650 uses 42 watts, works great with hd video, and will run Ut3 just fine.
http://www.overclock3d.net/rev..._extreme_pcs_edition/7
Your psu is a little weak for a 4670 in my opinion.
Originally posted by: happy medium
i didn't write the chart but the little % sign next to the 4670 it refers to manufacturer specs not reviews.
In any event if the most intensive game he is running is Ut3, he's fine with the 3650. Another plus is the 3650 is much cheaper.
I believe the 4670 might be bottlenecked a bit by the x2 4200 also.
Originally posted by: monkey333
i pulled the trig on the 3650.. and a blu ray drive.
150 total..
not bad..
Originally posted by: toyota
Originally posted by: happy medium
i didn't write the chart but the little % sign next to the 4670 it refers to manufacturer specs not reviews.
In any event if the most intensive game he is running is Ut3, he's fine with the 3650. Another plus is the 3650 is much cheaper.
I believe the 4670 might be bottlenecked a bit by the x2 4200 also.
well the 4670 does use less power than the 2600xt according to every review. I remember that when i was researching on the 4670 last year.
yes the 4670 would be slightly bottlenecked in newer games and I know this for a fact becasue I had a 4670 with a 5000x2. the 4670 provided zero minimum framerate improvement over my 8600gt in most games. in fact it was slower in UT3 than the 8600gt was.
Originally posted by: happy medium
Originally posted by: toyota
Originally posted by: happy medium
i didn't write the chart but the little % sign next to the 4670 it refers to manufacturer specs not reviews.
In any event if the most intensive game he is running is Ut3, he's fine with the 3650. Another plus is the 3650 is much cheaper.
I believe the 4670 might be bottlenecked a bit by the x2 4200 also.
well the 4670 does use less power than the 2600xt according to every review. I remember that when i was researching on the 4670 last year.
yes the 4670 would be slightly bottlenecked in newer games and I know this for a fact becasue I had a 4670 with a 5000x2. the 4670 provided zero minimum framerate improvement over my 8600gt in most games. in fact it was slower in UT3 than the 8600gt was.
According to the article you linked the 4670 smokes a 8600gts ,so i'm sure it would kill a 8600gt.
http://www.legionhardware.com/document.php?id=789&p=7
Edit: They used a Q6600 @ 3.0. Seems your system was bottlenecked?