I took this over from another user who started it back in 2013. The sheer number of CPUs represented may make it relevant as a reference, and since R15 can't be directly compared to 11.5, and no one here has bothered to make a comprehensive score list of R15 scores, here we are.Is there a reason to use this and not R15?
I took this over from another user who started it back in 2013. The sheer number of CPUs represented may make it relevant as a reference, and since R15 can't be directly compared to 11.5, and no one here has bothered to make a comprehensive score list of R15 scores, here we are.
I wonder if each distinct architecture might have its own correction factor? If the consensus is that this thread is of no further use, I'm okay with letting it drop or having it locked, I just need some opinions.you can compare Cinebench R11.5 and R15... at least for K10 (its usually very very close +- 1% or so) and it seems to work ballpark for the others. To convert from CB R11.5 to R15... just multiply by 83.2 and vice versa.
Excellent! Is that a 5% BCLK bump there?
Wait, it's also at full turbo on all cores!? Care to share how you managed that?
Post a screenshot of your score and of CPU-Z or AIDA64, showing clockspeed and CPU type. Please make sure your screencap shows the speed at which the test was performed! Scores without this information will not be included in the list. Also, scores from other versions of Cinebench will not be included in this list. One score for each unique CPU per user will be recorded, updates will be allowed.
Download link for Cinebench 11.5:
http://http.maxon.net/pub/benchmarks/CINEBENCH_11.529.zip
Oh well. I'm not going to run all that again.requires screenshots
I'm sorry about that. I feel that the current system has worked fairly well and helps ensure accurate data. As always, I am open to suggestions on how to improve the thread.Oh well. I'm not going to run all that again.
it runs stock @ 3.5 but does turbo to 3.9 on 2 or less cores.@Iron Woode Is your CPU running at stock speeds? Your score would seem to indicate that the test took place at 3.7GHz.