New TV advice

Page 3 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.

Dranoche

Senior member
Jul 6, 2009
293
65
101
Yes, and they have it in a 77" version this year. Early reports are good; they weren't supposed to be sold before 2/21, but there are a couple of people that managed to purchase last week and have been providing information on another forum I frequent. Curious to see how the C3/G3 will stack against it when they come out.
The G3 is adding a micro lens array which will allow for increased brightness and improve viewing angles. The marketing on increased brightness almost always points to peak brightness, which I suppose is good if you specifically need it for a bright room. I think it's better to view it as greater efficiency - same perceived or measured brightness at less power, which means less chance of burn-in and reduced temporary image retention. No major new features on the C3.
 

jamesdsimone

Senior member
Dec 21, 2015
236
48
101
That's cool. What do you plan doing? Waiting or ordering?
I am haven't decide what I want. I have to find some place to see the Sony's. I'm in no rush. I have 3 TV's already. When I do get a new one, I'm going to retire my old Samsung plasma and donate it.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Muadib

jamesdsimone

Senior member
Dec 21, 2015
236
48
101
I finally found a BestBuy that had all the options on display(I went to the BestBuy near the rich people). This is what I thought of all the options.

The LG QNED 80 vs 85. The 85 had noticeably better color worth the price difference, 899 vs 1299, so ruled out the QNED 80. The LG C2 was in a very bright area so probably made the picture not as good as possible. 1699.
SONY had the X80k, X85k, X90k and X95k QLED's. The X80k colors were also noticeably inferior to the X90k and the X95k was 200 dollars more than the A80k so ruled those 2 out. The X85k is only 200 less than the X90k and lower end so ruled that out to. So down to the following. The X90k and QNED 85 were not side by side so not sure which looked better. My impression was the QNED 85. I had to assume that none of the TV's were adjusted to look worse or better to sell one more than the other. Opinions?

QLED
LG QNED 85 1299
Sony X90k 1199

OLED
LG C2 1699
Sony A90j 2199
Sony A80k 1999
 
Last edited:

igor_kavinski

Diamond Member
Jul 27, 2020
8,788
5,212
106
QLED
LG QNED 85 1299
Sony X90k 1199
That's the decision you have to make. The others are priced too high.

Saw the X90K and it had a good quality picture. QNED80 also looked bright and colorful to me so the 85 must be above average looking. I would slightly lean towards Sony if I would be messing with the picture processing settings. LG if I don't care about sharpening the picture and just want to watch a simple, unprocessed display (LG's processing kinda sucks so I keep most of my LG C8's options at default. Messed with them once and it made a mess of the picture plus it was laggy as hell in gaming).
 

jamesdsimone

Senior member
Dec 21, 2015
236
48
101
That's the decision you have to make. The others are priced too high.

Saw the X90K and it had a good quality picture. QNED80 also looked bright and colorful to me so the 85 must be above average looking. I would slightly lean towards Sony if I would be messing with the picture processing settings. LG if I don't care about sharpening the picture and just want to watch a simple, unprocessed display (LG's processing kinda sucks so I keep most of my LG C8's options at default. Messed with them once and it made a mess of the picture plus it was laggy as hell in gaming).
All of these are within my budget. It's just a question of whether or not the extra money is worth it and if I want to go OLED vs QLED. I'm not sure how much of bonus Sony's image processing would be or whether I would even use it. I can tweak the picture with my media player when I'm watching movies.
 

jamesdsimone

Senior member
Dec 21, 2015
236
48
101
How do you usually enjoy watching your movies? In a lighted room or in a dark or relatively low light room? If it's the latter, OLED fits the bill. Otherwise, for mixed use cases, QLED would serve you better.
The TV will be in my bedroom which is dark even with bright sunshine so brightness is not really an issue. Brightness was supposed to be an issue with plasmas and I never had any problems with my plasmas since they were all in dark rooms.
 

igor_kavinski

Diamond Member
Jul 27, 2020
8,788
5,212
106

On Rtings, these TVs score:

QLED
LG QNED 85 8.1
Sony X90k 7.8

OLED
LG C2 8.9
Sony A90j 8.9
Sony A80k 8.7

I would personally focus on the HDR quality of these TVs. In a dark room, the QNED85 may appear to be too bright for comfortable viewing so let's rule that out. A80K is a comparatively lower end OLED model with slightly weaker brightness so that goes out the window too. The A90J offers better peak and sustained HDR brightness than the C2 so if money were no object, I would go for A90J.

But if you don't want to deal with possible burn-in issues if you watch a lot of news/sports channels or content where there is a prominent logo on screen, get the QNED85 for better peace of mind. The QNED85 would also be a better monitor due to a less aggressive brightness limiter.
 

jamesdsimone

Senior member
Dec 21, 2015
236
48
101
Right now if I am going with a QLED the I think the LG QNED 85 is my choice. Brightness can always be turned down. When I looked at it today the colors looked very good. For OLED, the A90j and C2 are pretty close. I watch no news/sports channels. The only static images would be my desktop. The Sony is 500 dollars more. I would not say money is no object but I need a compelling reason to spend it. Rting says "the LG is slightly brighter with some scenes". I assume the Sony uses the QD OLED panel which is supposed to be brighter that the woled? The LG EVO panel is their brightest?
 

igor_kavinski

Diamond Member
Jul 27, 2020
8,788
5,212
106
Rting says "the LG is slightly brighter with some scenes". I assume the Sony uses the QD OLED panel which is supposed to be brighter that the woled? The LG EVO panel is their brightest?
Not sure about the panel tech used in Sony. Rtings seem to love the G2 (score of 9) which would be more expensive than the C2 since it has the brighter EVO panel. I checked and the G2 HDR brightness is exceptionally high.

The only static images would be my desktop.
Personally, I'm not comfortable leaving the static desktop running on my C8. Always make sure to run the Mystify screensaver if I leave it for a few minutes and even if I'm doing something on it other than gaming or movies, I will click the preview button of the screensaver for a few seconds just to prevent the image from remaining static for too long.
 

jamesdsimone

Senior member
Dec 21, 2015
236
48
101
I know the G2 is rated better but it doesn't come with a stand. It's an extra 149.00 which puts it at the same price as the A90j. Not sure the G2 is worth a 500 dollar premium over the C2. I never leave the desktop sitting. There is generally something streaming. I would have a screen saver too. I used plasmas for years as my primary PC display.
 

igor_kavinski

Diamond Member
Jul 27, 2020
8,788
5,212
106
Not sure the G2 is worth a 500 dollar premium over the C2.
I have the C8 which is the one model in the middle of LG's OLED history where they cranked the brightness to 1000 nits. A lot of times, it can feel very bright and I have to avert my eyes. But when it happens in a movie scene where the audience is SUPPOSED to be dazzled by the bright light, I feel good about owning the C8. I think the C2 wouldn't be as impressive in such scenes.
 
  • Like
Reactions: JimKiler

jamesdsimone

Senior member
Dec 21, 2015
236
48
101
Sony uses the regular WRGB OLED panel on the A80 and A90. They use QD-OLED on the A95 models.
I saw that and even on sale the A95K is 800 dollars more than the C2. The C2 gets way better reviews for low input lag. So if I go with the OLED it's the C2 as of now.
 

Fallen Kell

Diamond Member
Oct 9, 1999
5,900
380
126

Dolby Vision Gaming!

DANG IT!

I can see my C8 having only 2 or 3 years left with me :(

I thought it would be with me the rest of its natural life :cry:
Yeah but still only 2 HDMI 2.1 ports.... I mean, seriously, I get it why 3 years ago we only had 2, and even to some small extent last year I understand why only a few models had 2, but we are up on the third generation of TVs after HDMI 2.1 came out and we still only get 2?
 
  • Like
Reactions: JimKiler
Thread starter Similar threads Forum Replies Date
Fardringle TVs 9

ASK THE COMMUNITY