Originally posted by: SneakyStuff
Dell really needs to start implementing AMD processor options into their home, AND enterprise level solutions. Because to be honest, I'm just not all that impressed with Dell anymore, I own 3 of them, in addition to my home-made rigs, but I don't think i'll ever get another Dell, for any reason, just because of their inability to adapt to "whats hot"
Originally posted by: Naustica
Dell is a multi-billion dollar company. I'm sure if selling AMD machines were in the best interest of their shareholders they would have done it by now. They probably have a good reason why don't don't offer AMD machines. Maybe AMD can't guarantee uninterrupted supply to Dell like Intel can?
Originally posted by: SneakyStuff
Dell really needs to start implementing AMD processor options into their home, AND enterprise level solutions. Because to be honest, I'm just not all that impressed with Dell anymore, I own 3 of them, in addition to my home-made rigs, but I don't think i'll ever get another Dell, for any reason, just because of their inability to adapt to "whats hot"
Originally posted by: GeneralGrievous
Unjust? That's business.
Originally posted by: Naustica
Wrong? You act like what you're stating is a proven fact. I guess you have proof? I know lot of AMD fans like to bring up this rumor as absolute fact but where's the proof? I'm sure DOJ would be interested. I'm sure AMD would be interested as well. You don't think Intel doesn't have lot of enemies? I'm sure all of them would be very interested in this proof you have.
As for Dell offering Linux, they do offer Linux on all their server line, including their budget $299 400SC line. Despite what Linux fans try to tell you most people still don't care about Linux for desktop. It's still pretty much server thing only. I'm sure Dell will be more than willing to offer to desktop users if the demand was there.
Dell is a public company. If Dell thought selling AMD machines was in their best financial interest they would have done it. Dell seems to have done pretty well selling Intel only machines compared to their competition who sell both. I guess posters here know how to run Dell better than Dell.
Originally posted by: Naustica
Wrong? You act like what you're stating is a proven fact. I guess you have proof? I know lot of AMD fans like to bring up this rumor as absolute fact but where's the proof? I'm sure DOJ would be interested. I'm sure AMD would be interested as well. You don't think Intel doesn't have lot of enemies? I'm sure all of them would be very interested in this proof you have.
As for Dell offering Linux, they do offer Linux on all their server line, including their budget $299 400SC line. Despite what Linux fans try to tell you most people still don't care about Linux for desktop. It's still pretty much server thing only. I'm sure Dell will be more than willing to offer to desktop users if the demand was there.
Dell is a public company. If Dell thought selling AMD machines was in their best financial interest they would have done it. Dell seems to have done pretty well selling Intel only machines compared to their competition who sell both. I guess posters here know how to run Dell better than Dell.
Originally posted by: keysplayr2003
Originally posted by: SneakyStuff
Dell really needs to start implementing AMD processor options into their home, AND enterprise level solutions. Because to be honest, I'm just not all that impressed with Dell anymore, I own 3 of them, in addition to my home-made rigs, but I don't think i'll ever get another Dell, for any reason, just because of their inability to adapt to "whats hot"
I understand that AMD is faster for games, but what game exactly cant you play on a P4 3.4GHz that you can play on a A64 3400+? Im guessing none. Processors from both companies bottleneck new vid cards anyways.
Dell systems are upgradable in everything. You can change the video cards to anything you want as long as you get a system with AGP, You can upgrade processors, add memory, change hard drives. The only thing you CANT do is o/c. Just my 2 cents worth. I like Dell, very reliable and quiet, not the best performers but decent.
I build my own rigs, but Dell is the only thing I buy for my company.
Originally posted by: reposado2
http://configure.us.dell.com/dellstore/config.aspx?cs=19&oc=DXPS3RS&m_11=WHXP&m_1=M368H&m_29=S222OS&c=us&l=en&s=dhs&kc=6V659
nice vid card and cpu on this baby.
Originally posted by: jiffylube1024
Originally posted by: Naustica
Wrong? You act like what you're stating is a proven fact. I guess you have proof? I know lot of AMD fans like to bring up this rumor as absolute fact but where's the proof? I'm sure DOJ would be interested. I'm sure AMD would be interested as well. You don't think Intel doesn't have lot of enemies? I'm sure all of them would be very interested in this proof you have.
As for Dell offering Linux, they do offer Linux on all their server line, including their budget $299 400SC line. Despite what Linux fans try to tell you most people still don't care about Linux for desktop. It's still pretty much server thing only. I'm sure Dell will be more than willing to offer to desktop users if the demand was there.
Dell is a public company. If Dell thought selling AMD machines was in their best financial interest they would have done it. Dell seems to have done pretty well selling Intel only machines compared to their competition who sell both. I guess posters here know how to run Dell better than Dell.
Yeah, hang on let me sift through my Kennedy assasination dossier and my Microsoft monopoly file folder to find the Intel anti-trust monopoly documents.
You can be obtuse and demand proof for something that is relatively obvious (especially back in the day when BTO companies not named Dell were dropping like flies and AMD was just entering the market with the Athlon chip), or you can open your eyes.
Big companies leverage monopolies and make deals like this all the time. If I had rock solid proof of this, don't you think Intel would be in legal trouble?
As an aside, nobody is saying they are suggesting how to run Dell better than Dell does, merely that Dell does not offer the choice of AMD to it's customers and has never offered the choice. Some people would like to be able to buy AMD-equipped Dells, but have never been given the opportunity.
As for Dell, you're right, it wouldn't be in their best interest to start selling AMD chips because it would sour their longstanding relationship with Intel.
^ In regards to the bolded part of your quote, does everyone who argues against you instantly become a fanboy, or a "fan of xxx" ?
Originally posted by: justin1466
My friend made the mistake of purchasing a Dell... Build it yourself dude, Dell has thee WORST Tech Support if something goes wrong they let you tell it to India (literally).
Click here and Look for a better Company than Dell, You will not regret it!
Thought i'd give ya a friendly heads up, and the system your building looks sweet dude![]()
Originally posted by: Matthias99
Originally posted by: keysplayr2003
Originally posted by: SneakyStuff
Dell really needs to start implementing AMD processor options into their home, AND enterprise level solutions. Because to be honest, I'm just not all that impressed with Dell anymore, I own 3 of them, in addition to my home-made rigs, but I don't think i'll ever get another Dell, for any reason, just because of their inability to adapt to "whats hot"
I understand that AMD is faster for games, but what game exactly cant you play on a P4 3.4GHz that you can play on a A64 3400+? Im guessing none. Processors from both companies bottleneck new vid cards anyways.
In this case, it's even *more* important to have a processor that's faster for games, since it won't bottleneck your video card as much. But, yes, it's not like a 3.0Ghz+ P4 is *slow* by any stretch of the imagination. It's just that the AMD processors tend to be faster for the same price, and/or the same speed for a lower price.
Dell systems are upgradable in everything. You can change the video cards to anything you want as long as you get a system with AGP, You can upgrade processors, add memory, change hard drives. The only thing you CANT do is o/c. Just my 2 cents worth. I like Dell, very reliable and quiet, not the best performers but decent.
I build my own rigs, but Dell is the only thing I buy for my company.
Their systems *are* upgradable, but if you buy the upgrades from Dell, you pay through the nose -- and if you buy and install aftermarket parts, you're voiding the warranty. If one of their preconfigured systems isn't exactly (or very close to) what you want, it's often not such a great deal, unless you don't get an extended warranty.
Originally posted by: Naustica
Conspiracy theories are nice and fun.
But without any proof how can you say you're right and I'm wrong?
What if Dell hasn't used AMD chips because AMD has bad habit of not being able to deliver and can't guarantee needed chip allocations to large company like Dell? What if Dell needs to plan year in advance all their product lines and strategy and AMD can't and won't provide clear and good enough roadmaps to satisfy them and allow Dell to conduct business in Dell efficient manner? Or maybe having two separate product lines from two different CPU makers might cause product and support headaches and actually cause costs and expense to go up and margins to drop? Couldn't any of these be big and good enough reasons for Dell to not use AMD?
But I guess anyone who thinks any differently from you are wrong and only has half a brain.
Because anyone with more than half a brain can clearly see the reason Dell doesn't use AMD is because of Intel's secret deal with Dell. It's true because it's so obvious and you said so.
If you're fan of some product or company, does that make you fanboy?
