this is close to my ideal laptop:
> nVidia graphics (good for linux)
> intel chipset (well it ain't nVidia, but i prefer it to Via/SIS/ATI)
> 13.3" widescreen
> portable
> magnesium body
http://www.scan.co.uk/Products...sp?WebProductID=168925
but, it uses the new PCI-E mobile chipset which as far as i'm aware is a derivitive of the 915 desktop chipset, right?
which if i remember correctly, is a load of pants with the 6200 turbo-cache because Intel farked up the PCI-E spec by making it 4GB upstream + 1GB downstream instead of 4GB full duplex, and as we all know turbo-cache requires masses of bandwidth.
so am i getting worried over nothing, have Intel fixed the PCI-E for the new mobile chipset, or is graphics power of this chip going to be retarded by poor Intel chipsets?
regards
REMF
> nVidia graphics (good for linux)
> intel chipset (well it ain't nVidia, but i prefer it to Via/SIS/ATI)
> 13.3" widescreen
> portable
> magnesium body
http://www.scan.co.uk/Products...sp?WebProductID=168925
but, it uses the new PCI-E mobile chipset which as far as i'm aware is a derivitive of the 915 desktop chipset, right?
which if i remember correctly, is a load of pants with the 6200 turbo-cache because Intel farked up the PCI-E spec by making it 4GB upstream + 1GB downstream instead of 4GB full duplex, and as we all know turbo-cache requires masses of bandwidth.
so am i getting worried over nothing, have Intel fixed the PCI-E for the new mobile chipset, or is graphics power of this chip going to be retarded by poor Intel chipsets?
regards
REMF