• We’re currently investigating an issue related to the forum theme and styling that is impacting page layout and visual formatting. The problem has been identified, and we are actively working on a resolution. There is no impact to user data or functionality, this is strictly a front-end display issue. We’ll post an update once the fix has been deployed. Thanks for your patience while we get this sorted.

New SETI client slower?

earthman

Golden Member
It seems that the 3.03 SETI client is alot slower than the previous one...has anyone else noticed this????
 
earthman: Yep, it's much slower than the 3.0 client. The reason is it's doing more analysis of the WU's. Good for science but bad for stats.

Rob
 
Yep, it's slower.
We are doing more analysis on each WU which give us a better chance of finding ET and also saves on bandwidth for Berkeley.
 
That is really lame!!!! I have also noticed it is slower...went from about 8.5 hrs. per WU to almost 14 hrs!!! 🙁

Anyone know how to get 3.0 back???
 
Just uninstall the 3.3 and reinstall the 3.0 that what I did. My time went from 6.5hours to 9 or 10 hours. I'll run the 3.0 till I have to change. I hope you've got your 3.0 copy back up somewhere.


ash357 😎
 
NOPE!!!! 🙁 Deleted it!!!! AAAGGGHHH!

Man,I should have read a little about it before installing...says right there on the home page:



<< NOTE ABOUT 3.03: This version contains significantly increased science analysis, and therefore runs slower than previous versions. Please see this page for more details. >>

 
Wingnut send me an email with your email address and I'll email it to you, the 3.0ver it just about 750k.


wj 😎 😎

EMAILME

 
With version 3.0.3 I noted that the number of floating point operations increased by about 50%. With 3.0 the average &quot;normal&quot; WU requires 2.83 TeraFLOPs to process, while version 3.0.3 states that 4.11 TeraFLOPs will be required. I got this info from SetiSpy.
 

it is much slower my 1.1 tbird takes about 8 hours

but we will all have to upgrade to it
at some point. ( i am only running it on 2 cpu's right now
and will wait for awhile before i upgrade all the others)
 
Aren't you guys getting your priorities wrong? It's supposed to be for science, not so that you can brag about your stats 😉

It's slower because it's doing more analysis...
 
Quoting someone famous(or, infamous) &quot;...it's the STATS, stupid!&quot;

It went something like that. 🙂😀


<Edited to correct speeling eror...>
 
I totally agree with ya' Snowy but, it's kind of a mixed bag as far as feelings toward the new client. Those of us without 1Ghz machines are going to start looking like some major slackers--our stats will suffer just like everyone else's but ya' gotta admit it hurts. Just a little? 😉

It's going to be hard to watch our averages slip away but, oh well! I guess I would rather find ET and if this new client does in fact help the cause then I guess I'm behind it 100%.



CUZ I BELIEVE BRUTHA!!!! 🙂
 
Back
Top