• We’re currently investigating an issue related to the forum theme and styling that is impacting page layout and visual formatting. The problem has been identified, and we are actively working on a resolution. There is no impact to user data or functionality, this is strictly a front-end display issue. We’ll post an update once the fix has been deployed. Thanks for your patience while we get this sorted.

New Rules For The NFL Coming Next Season?

Article

NEW YORK (AP) -- The NFL is satisfied with its officiating but concerned that high-profile errors in the playoffs and Super Bowl left a bad impression.

So beginning next week at league meetings in Orlando, Fla., it will tweak a few rules, dealing mostly with player safety, offensive holding and false starts.

"Because of the magnitude of the games, there's an indictment of the system," Atlanta general manager Rich McKay, co-chairman of the league's competition committee, said Wednesday during a conference call.

The main topic will be the first steps in choosing a successor to Paul Tagliabue. The commissioner will appoint a committee Monday to begin the process.

McKay, a leading candidate, dodged several questions on that subject. Instead, he spent most of his time discussing officiating, as did his committee during meetings the past month in Indianapolis and Naples, Fla.

In the 256 games during the past regular season, there were 850 false-start calls. To cut that number, the committee is ready to recommend that minor flinches by wide receivers be ignored if they have no effect on the play.

The committee also is considering recommending to officials that they make sure there was holding on a play before throwing a flag.

"We want to make sure they actually see the foul," McKay said.

One such play occurred in the Super Bowl. Seattle right tackle Sean Locklear was called for holding on a pass completion early in the fourth quarter that would have put the Seahawks at the Pittsburgh 1-yard line, poised to go in for the tying touchdown. After the penalty, Seattle quarterback Matt Hasselbeck threw an interception and the Steelers eventually scored to take a 14-point lead.

The committee also wants to change the rule on hits by defenders below the knee on quarterbacks. McKay said defensive players will be told they must make an effort to avoid hitting QBs in the legs to avoid serious injuries, like the hit on Cincinnati's Carson Palmer against the Steelers in the playoffs.

Another recommendation expands the rule put in place last year against "horse collar" tackles. That violation mandated flags only when a defensive player coming from behind got his hands inside the shoulder pads of a player with the ball. If it is expanded, it would extend that to tackles inside the shirt.

The committee also is considering an annual proposal from the Kansas City Chiefs to expand the playoffs from 12 to 14 teams. He said there was more interest in it this year, although he stopped short of saying the committee would recommend it.

In addition to McKay, the committee includes coach Jeff Fisher of Tennessee, the co-chairman; general managers Ozzie Newsome of Baltimore; Bill Polian of Indianapolis; and executives John Mara of the New York Giants and Mark Richardson of Carolina. Coach Marvin Lewis of Cincinnati is a nonvoting member.


Seems pretty well thought out to me, but I do not like the rule about avoiding hitting QB's below the knees. Its football and key players get injured, football is called a violent sport for a reason, period. That is not to say I am against the creation of rules to prevent unsafe practices, such as the cowboy collar rule.

I also have thought about what would happen if they expanded the playoffs, I guess it sounds like a good idea, but in the end I think it would not really matter (I really doubt a team at 8-8 can win the Super Bowl), and it would take away attention from the teams that have earned it. I guess this is just another case of "How can I milk as much money from the playoffs as I possibly can?"
 
Originally posted by: F22 Raptor
And, in other news Vince Young runs a dissapointing 40, but still impresses NFL scouts during workout.

Text

IMHO, way too much weight is given to workout/combine results, such that it overshadows what the player did during actual games. If I remember correctly, Jerry Rice never had a great 40 time, and he turned out pretty OK as a WR. Lots of NFL greats never had great workout numbers, and lots of guys who did great at the combine never really panned out in the NFL. If I were V. Young, I'd just say hey, check out the game film - that's all you need to know.
 
Originally posted by: Mursilis
Originally posted by: F22 Raptor
And, in other news Vince Young runs a dissapointing 40, but still impresses NFL scouts during workout.

Text

IMHO, way too much weight is given to workout/combine results, such that it overshadows what the player did during actual games. If I remember correctly, Jerry Rice never had a great 40 time, and he turned out pretty OK as a WR. Lots of NFL greats never had great workout numbers, and lots of guys who did great at the combine never really panned out in the NFL. If I were V. Young, I'd just say hey, check out the game film - that's all you need to know.

I agree, but I also feel the ability for a young pre-NFL athlete to step up when the pressure is on is important. Not to mention the non Vince Young's out there that have atteneded small football schools and need a chance to show their stuff.
 
Back
Top