New Prescotts

phillyman36

Golden Member
Jun 28, 2004
1,789
201
106
Hey on the front page of Anandtech they talk about the new prescotts with 2meg of cache and this

Enhanced Speed Step Technology (EIST, also known as ESS depending on your circles). Up until now, EIST has been limited only to Pentium M processors. For those not familiar with EIST, it is simply a feature which allows a user to dynamically clock the processor during operation; very much like AMD's Cool 'n Quiet


Of the 2 which would you take the Northwoods or the Newer Prescotts?
 

icarus4586

Senior member
Jun 10, 2004
219
0
0
Depends on what frequency you're looking for and how soon you're planning on upgrading. For s478 &amp; <= 3.2GHz, Northwood all the way. Prescott is slightly slower (generally) per MHz, but gets higher clock speeds, and is available in LGA775 flavors.
 

o1die

Diamond Member
Jul 8, 2001
4,785
0
71
Don't waste your money on high end prescotts. Get the 2.8 model. My 2.8c runs at 3.36-3.64 (with a slight voltage increase). It was only $150 with mobo at Fry's.
 

nick1985

Lifer
Dec 29, 2002
27,153
6
81
Originally posted by: phillyman36
i was looking at the 3.4 or 3.6 Prescott when it comes out

gotta say it....have you checked out the athlon 64's?
 

saechaka

Golden Member
Jun 19, 2003
1,162
0
0
Originally posted by: o1die
Don't waste your money on high end prescotts. Get the 2.8 model. My 2.8c runs at 3.36-3.64 (with a slight voltage increase). It was only $150 with mobo at Fry's.

do you mean your 2.8e?
 

icarus4586

Senior member
Jun 10, 2004
219
0
0
He probably does mean 2.8c. Meaning a Northwood core.
If your're going 3.4-3.6GHz, I think you pretty much have to go Prescott. I don't think there are any Northwoods higher than 3.2GHz. Or go AMD64 :)
 

saechaka

Golden Member
Jun 19, 2003
1,162
0
0
Originally posted by: saechaka
Originally posted by: o1die
Don't waste your money on high end prescotts. Get the 2.8 model. My 2.8c runs at 3.36-3.64 (with a slight voltage increase). It was only $150 with mobo at Fry's.

do you mean your 2.8e?

when did you find a cpu/mobo deal w/2.8c for $150? i don't know how i missed that one, i've been waiting for something like that.
 

Bateluer

Lifer
Jun 23, 2001
27,730
8
0
Originally posted by: saechaka
Originally posted by: saechaka
Originally posted by: o1die
Don't waste your money on high end prescotts. Get the 2.8 model. My 2.8c runs at 3.36-3.64 (with a slight voltage increase). It was only $150 with mobo at Fry's.

do you mean your 2.8e?

when did you find a cpu/mobo deal w/2.8c for $150? i don't know how i missed that one, i've been waiting for something like that.

Fry's usually has combo deals like that. It usually a decent proc bundled with a sub-par mobo though.
 

imported_Phil

Diamond Member
Feb 10, 2001
9,837
0
0
So is the 3Ghz 1Mb L2 cache P4 (LGA-775) a Prescott? If so, that would explain why the chip at work that I'm heat-testing is so damned hot at full load...
 

phillyman36

Golden Member
Jun 28, 2004
1,789
201
106
I think there is a little confusion sorry im talking about the newer prescott with 2 m of cache coming in the first quarter of 2005 the articel in on the news section front page of anandtech ill cut and paste some of the article

For starters, Intel will release 4 new SKUs of Socket 775 processors based on 2MB L2 cache revisions of the Prescott core. However, the new 6xx processors are not just Prescotts with extra L2 cache slapped on them. In fact, the most interesting addition we noted with these new processors is the addition of Enhanced Speed Step Technology (EIST, also known as ESS depending on your circles). Up until now, EIST has been limited only to Pentium M processors. For those not familiar with EIST, it is simply a feature which allows a user to dynamically clock the processor during operation; very much like AMD's Cool 'n Quiet. This would certainly be a welcomed addition to the NetBurst architecture as cooling issues are more and more prevalent as Prescott ramps up.

this is what i want your opinion on the prescott with this ESS/EIST and the extra 1m cache