Originally posted by: BriGy86
pic added
Why not? I do not understand why you are concerned.Originally posted by: Jzero
The one with the buffalo is weird. Was it really necessary to make the buffalo anatomically accurate?
Originally posted by: Evadman
Why not? I do not understand why you are concerned.Originally posted by: Jzero
The one with the buffalo is weird. Was it really necessary to make the buffalo anatomically accurate?
Originally posted by: Evadman
Why not? I do not understand why you are concerned.Originally posted by: Jzero
The one with the buffalo is weird. Was it really necessary to make the buffalo anatomically accurate?
I confess, I have never seen an actual buffalo, but the feature on the coin doesn't look like anything I would describe as a "tuft."Originally posted by: Rogue
Originally posted by: Evadman
Why not? I do not understand why you are concerned.Originally posted by: Jzero
The one with the buffalo is weird. Was it really necessary to make the buffalo anatomically accurate?
Have you ever seen a Buffalo in person? That is actually a tuft of hair that hangs off their belly, male or female.
Also, how long before someone comes up with some bull$hit about how Lewis and Clark raped indians and were otherwise bad people and lobby to have the Nickel changed? Give it time, the morons will find something wrong with it....
Originally posted by: BDawg
Is anyone here a nickel back fan?