New Infiniti Coupe Concept

[Triumph]

i like it.

 

[Looney]

Wow, sexy car!

 

[Baked]

Those seats are sex. And the panoramic roof. DAMN!

 

[suse920]

DAMN!!!!

 

[nateholtrop]

Hopefully they put some balls under the hood of that thing. It looks awesome..but if it's like the current G35 Couple in terms of performance . Time will tell!

 

[loup garou]

*boing*
:Q

 

[Tu13erhead]

That thing is so nice it hurts.

I want one.

 

[Doggiedog]

Looks sweet. I wonder what the sedan and the actual Skyline GT-R are going to look like.

 

[Tremulant]

that is so sexy.

Assuming it'll look that nice in 2009, I'll be getting one of them when I have to return my Altima.

 

[Ryan]

Originally posted by: Doggiedog
Looks sweet. I wonder what the sedan and the actual Skyline GT-R are going to look like.

Remember - it's not a skyline, it's simply the "GT-R".

 

[StevenYoo]

holy good gravy

 

[BMdoobieW]

very nice

 

[Caesar]

Originally posted by: nateholtrop
Hopefully they put some balls under the hood of that thing. It looks awesome..but if it's like the current G35 Couple in terms of performance . Time will tell!

. I have no first hand experience but I always thought that g35 had plenty power and good performance numbers. Well thats what ppl always said, even the ones who had 350z.

 

[Vich]

Unbelivably sexy.

 

[CraigRT]

That car is stupidly hot... good freaking god...

:jawdrop;

so nice!!!

 

[PricklyPete]

ooooohhhh...very nice...

 

[fs5]

hot.

 

[Kelvrick]

God damn. That is the grill that the current G35 needs. Really good update in my opinion. I think the sharper tail in the current G35 looks a bit better though.

 

[Aharami]

Originally posted by: Goosemaster
hot....just round out the front....

agreed. i like it...but why does infinity insist on making the tail lights so damn big? the taillights on the current M take up more than half the backspace. fugly

 

[nateholtrop]

Originally posted by: CaesaR

Originally posted by: nateholtrop
Hopefully they put some balls under the hood of that thing. It looks awesome..but if it's like the current G35 Couple in terms of performance . Time will tell!

. I have no first hand experience but I always thought that g35 had plenty power and good performance numbers. Well thats what ppl always said, even the ones who had 350z.

Well they are ok..nothing stellar. I mean it'll beat your average Taurus but much else and it's done for.

 

[Ryan]

Originally posted by: nateholtrop

Originally posted by: CaesaR

Originally posted by: nateholtrop
Hopefully they put some balls under the hood of that thing. It looks awesome..but if it's like the current G35 Couple in terms of performance . Time will tell!

. I have no first hand experience but I always thought that g35 had plenty power and good performance numbers. Well thats what ppl always said, even the ones who had 350z.

Well they are ok..nothing stellar. I mean it'll beat your average Taurus but much else and it's done for.

Yay for magazine racers!

 

[Shlong]

Originally posted by: nateholtrop

Originally posted by: CaesaR

Originally posted by: nateholtrop
Hopefully they put some balls under the hood of that thing. It looks awesome..but if it's like the current G35 Couple in terms of performance . Time will tell!

. I have no first hand experience but I always thought that g35 had plenty power and good performance numbers. Well thats what ppl always said, even the ones who had 350z.

Well they are ok..nothing stellar. I mean it'll beat your average Taurus but much else and it's done for.

http://www.autos.com/autos/luxury_cars/near-luxury_cars/acceleration It isn't that bad, especially compared to other cars in the same segment.

 

[thirdeye]

Originally posted by: Shlong

Originally posted by: nateholtrop

Originally posted by: CaesaR

Originally posted by: nateholtrop
Hopefully they put some balls under the hood of that thing. It looks awesome..but if it's like the current G35 Couple in terms of performance . Time will tell!

. I have no first hand experience but I always thought that g35 had plenty power and good performance numbers. Well thats what ppl always said, even the ones who had 350z.

Well they are ok..nothing stellar. I mean it'll beat your average Taurus but much else and it's done for.

http://www.autos.com/autos/luxury_cars/near-luxury_cars/acceleration It isn't that bad, especially compared to other cars in the same segment.

^^ That has to be the worst list ever mostly because of this:

2006 Chrysler 300C
?The 340-horsepower Hemi has to carry 4046 pounds, so it won't run with a Corvette, but it is plenty fast, with a 0-60 time of 6.3 seconds, according to Chrysler.? ? New Car Test Drive

But yet they quote the 0-60 as 4.7

Either way the new concept looks pretty hot.

 

[Shlong]

Originally posted by: thirdeye

Originally posted by: Shlong

Originally posted by: nateholtrop

Originally posted by: CaesaR

Originally posted by: nateholtrop
Hopefully they put some balls under the hood of that thing. It looks awesome..but if it's like the current G35 Couple in terms of performance . Time will tell!

. I have no first hand experience but I always thought that g35 had plenty power and good performance numbers. Well thats what ppl always said, even the ones who had 350z.

Well they are ok..nothing stellar. I mean it'll beat your average Taurus but much else and it's done for.

http://www.autos.com/autos/luxury_cars/near-luxury_cars/acceleration It isn't that bad, especially compared to other cars in the same segment.

^^ That has to be the worst list ever mostly because of this:

2006 Chrysler 300C
?The 340-horsepower Hemi has to carry 4046 pounds, so it won't run with a Corvette, but it is plenty fast, with a 0-60 time of 6.3 seconds, according to Chrysler.? ? New Car Test Drive

But yet they quote the 0-60 as 4.7

Either way the new concept looks pretty hot.

It's quoting NCTD "6.3 seconds according to chrysler" : http://www.nctd.com/review-intro.cfm?Vehicle=2005_Chrysler_300&ReviewID=1557 The 4.7 time they get is from http://www.caranddriver.com/article.asp?section_id=3&article_id=9479 (Car & Driver). Each has a quote from various sources with different times (ie: Lexus claiming certain 0-60 time for IS350 while tests from a certain magazine say otherwise, etc).

 

[thirdeye]

Yeah, I understand that, but they are originally talking about the 340hp 300c and then quote a SRT8 time.