- Sep 4, 2006
- 170
- 0
- 0
Originally posted by: radioouman
I like it. It is a very practical shape.
Originally posted by: zoiks
Originally posted by: radioouman
I like it. It is a very practical shape.
Now the shape is practical too? How does a shape become practical?
Originally posted by: radioouman
Originally posted by: zoiks
Originally posted by: radioouman
I like it. It is a very practical shape.
Now the shape is practical too? How does a shape become practical?
Wagons are practical because of the amount of stuff that you can haul. Hatchbacks are the same, with moderately less cargo carrying ability, but still more than a sedan with a conventional trunk.
This design crosses the boundary between a wagon and a hatchback and therefore is more practical (in cargo carrying ability) than a standard sedan.
Originally posted by: zoiks
Originally posted by: radioouman
Originally posted by: zoiks
Originally posted by: radioouman
I like it. It is a very practical shape.
Now the shape is practical too? How does a shape become practical?
Wagons are practical because of the amount of stuff that you can haul. Hatchbacks are the same, with moderately less cargo carrying ability, but still more than a sedan with a conventional trunk.
This design crosses the boundary between a wagon and a hatchback and therefore is more practical (in cargo carrying ability) than a standard sedan.
I guess the Aztek was pretty 'practical' then even if it was ugly.
Originally posted by: zoiks
Originally posted by: radioouman
Originally posted by: zoiks
Originally posted by: radioouman
I like it. It is a very practical shape.
Now the shape is practical too? How does a shape become practical?
Wagons are practical because of the amount of stuff that you can haul. Hatchbacks are the same, with moderately less cargo carrying ability, but still more than a sedan with a conventional trunk.
This design crosses the boundary between a wagon and a hatchback and therefore is more practical (in cargo carrying ability) than a standard sedan.
I guess the Aztek was pretty 'practical' then even if it was ugly.
Originally posted by: Funyuns101
But the Aztek was already an SUV - just a really ugly one at that.
The Prius and new Insight are vying for something more along the lines of the Matrix or Mazda3 hatch look: a miniature SUV, which gives (as radioouman said) more room than the normal sedan and obviously much better fuel economy
Originally posted by: Funyuns101
Originally posted by: zoiks
Originally posted by: radioouman
Originally posted by: zoiks
Originally posted by: radioouman
I like it. It is a very practical shape.
Now the shape is practical too? How does a shape become practical?
Wagons are practical because of the amount of stuff that you can haul. Hatchbacks are the same, with moderately less cargo carrying ability, but still more than a sedan with a conventional trunk.
This design crosses the boundary between a wagon and a hatchback and therefore is more practical (in cargo carrying ability) than a standard sedan.
I guess the Aztek was pretty 'practical' then even if it was ugly.
But the Aztek was already an SUV - just a really ugly one at that.
The Prius and new Insight are vying for something more along the lines of the Matrix or Mazda3 hatch look: a miniature SUV, which gives (as radioouman said) more room than the normal sedan and obviously much better fuel economy
Originally posted by: Imp
I like. Love the unique look of the Prius, but I've heard that there are issues with its control/dash.
Originally posted by: Zenmervolt
Every car will ultimately look much like this. It's what you're stuck with when aerodynamics are the only real consideration in the design of the exterior shape.
ZV