Question new gaming monitor

[hardcore_gamer29]

ok as we know there is shortage of every electronic parts . I need to buy 1080p atleast 144hz gaming monitor now, the options i have in india are:
samsung g3 144hz
msi optix g24c6p (has contrast of 3000:1)
gigabyte f24
gigabyte aorus fi25f
asus vg259qr
i also watch netflix prime video etc., so colour reproduction will matter also.
What i do not want? i do not want ghosting input lag etc. in games, i also want good deep blacks in games not greyed washed out.
I do not need that blurry fuzzy test too on windows 10

 

[funboy6942]

I am looking to trade a Sceptre 32" 1080P 185HZ, colors pop, blacks are black, no washout in anything running on it, but I do mention that they can be had now with higher HZes on Amazon where I got it, but I thought paying $400 for a 32" monitor was going to be kinda crazy, but did a bunch of readying and video watching and found people love this brand, and I have had a few in the past, for in fact my buddy bought my old 32" tv I bought god 10 years ago, and to this day is still using it, and its on all the time, never shut off hardly. But look into them, or got something to trade look at mine
OH and though it says freesync on it, My Nvidia 3060 saw it, and turned on the Nvidia what have you for it as well.

 

[hardcore_gamer29]

should i go with asus vg259qr

 

[funboy6942]

If you are asking me then I cannot answer that. I do know it was less screen area, and much more money then my unit, and I was more then, and beyond that happy with that product, and has been little over a year without a single problem, and did not, and have not yet popped a pixel, so all good in my book. If you get something else, and have money for it getting the Asus, please lmk what you got for I like to look up the specs again and see whats the diff between the two, and should I then get it later in life

 

[hardcore_gamer29]

If you are asking me then I cannot answer that. I do know it was less screen area, and much more money then my unit, and I was more then, and beyond that happy with that product, and has been little over a year without a single problem, and did not, and have not yet popped a pixel, so all good in my book. If you get something else, and have money for it getting the Asus, please lmk what you got for I like to look up the specs again and see whats the diff between the two, and should I then get it later in life

i have 2 options only now msi g24c6p or this asus vg259qr but this asus has contrast only 1000:1 but ips panel while msi is 3000:1 but va panel

 

[funboy6942]

as contrast will be nice, whats its PPI? Thats gonna matter if you sit kinda close and Pixels are all about and all you mind will focus on whilst gaming.

As for which one of those 2 I would pick after looking up the specs......

This one because its a VA, FS, BRIGHT (you need this in a tv as well as a PC monitor if you want the stuff to pop off the screen). new port versions, and if I got it with plans of putting 3 of them up, has the thinest sides of any other PC monitor out there. After owning a few of this brans, and reading more reviews, they are really putting out some kick butt stuff.

If it had to be smaller this one.

And honestly if I had to pick one of the 2 you mentioned, it would be really hard, but if I had to it would be which ever has the most of, and up to date ports on their rigs and a tighter PPI is a MUST for then I look for the other stuff it can do (tighter PPI means better visuals, hence why a PC monitor always looks better up close then a tv does, in most cases). Also since neither list the brightness of them, would need to see them somewhere in person to find out which was brighter. Curve, no curve, it doesn't matter at 32 inches, so even smaller would be no more then a novelty. When buying and figured out which one it is going to be, then I would look on Craigslist, Facebook market, or ebay to buy one used to save more money, or get 2 for the price of one new. I would do some very heavy reading and watching of videos before you commit to ANY of them at all

But if this is what I had to do, and was there many times, I hardly if ever bought something with a name brand attached to it, for going with a "off" brand is usually made at the same factory as all the rest anyways, but no name seems to put in some more time so then they can sell kick butt stuff at a low price so they can become a big company like the other that will then buy/make the cheapest they can find and resell for the bottom like is more important then giving the people what they want or like at a good price.

 

[hardcore_gamer29]

ports are same on both and ppi difference is only marginal msi has ppi 91 and asus has 89

 

[funboy6942]

Well one has a extra port the other does dot, so it really will come down to you, your money, space, looking for. I mentioned I would buy it in a Spectre form, had many, friend too (his was my first Spectre product 32" 1080P I bought over 10 years ago that is still working and he is using on his pc, as I am still blown away with how good it looked, and how old it is now), I still do, but going on specs and price alone, if I was looking at all 4.

Spectre 27"
Size, ports do 2.0 on the HDMI side, much better then 1.4, more ports then one name brand. Bright AF, a MUST in ANY Projector/tv/pc monitor to get colors and mainly contrast to "POP". No outter bezels to be really seen, another must if I planed on going with 3 of them, a must if going to span out to make one large gaming monitor whilst gaming.

25"
Same reasons above, but cheaper

The other 2

Sorry, wouldn't buy either after owning several things from this brand, they spank the two you mentioned in every way, other then I think sRGB, but with Nvidia, and for sure AMD you have color control and can fix any monitor to do a heck of a lot better ootb.

Maybe you can tell me why it is it has to be MSI or ASUS, so I can see what is soooooo much better then the other and go hmmmm, never thought of that, perhaps?

 

[Glo.]

ok as we know there is shortage of every electronic parts . I need to buy 1080p atleast 144hz gaming monitor now, the options i have in india are:
samsung g3 144hz
msi optix g24c6p (has contrast of 3000:1)
gigabyte f24
gigabyte aorus fi25f
asus vg259qr
i also watch netflix prime video etc., so colour reproduction will matter also.
What i do not want? i do not want ghosting input lag etc. in games, i also want good deep blacks in games not greyed washed out.
I do not need that blurry fuzzy test too on windows 10

Gigabyte G24F is quite possibly the best budget monitor around with 116% SRGB color gamut, ARGB - 80.4%, DCI-P3 82.6%, and has brilliant contrast ratio for an IPS - 1123:1.

Data for this extracted from this review:

Motion is fluid, as it should be for 165/170 Hz monitor, low input lag, obviously.

The only place where you could wish to get more is that refresh rate: 240 Hz.

Speaking of 240 Hz, Dell has released the cheapest 240 Hz, 1080p, IPS monitor on the market: Dell S2522HG. It retails in Europe for 290€.

Honestly. Those are two displays to buy in current monitor market.

 

[BlackWhite]

4K gaming is a high-end endeavor. To achieve decent frame rates at this high resolution, you need to have a huge amount of rendering power. This dream is possible if you have a top-of-the-line graphics card like the RTX3080 Ti or RTX3080.
The LG UltraGear 4K Nano IPS 1ms gaming screen will show off your GPU's power. The 4K 27-inch HDR monitor features a 144Hz refresh rate and a 1ms response speed, which is quite impressive for a 4K monitor. The Nano IPS tech, which offers a wider range of colors and excellent viewing angles, is what is best.

 

[hardcore_gamer29]

i do not think any GPU can give me 120+ fps constant in games like battlefield multiplayer

 

[Furious_Styles]

i do not think any GPU can give me 120+ fps constant in games like battlefield multiplayer

They absolutely can. Especially at 1080p.

 

[hardcore_gamer29]

We are talking about 4k only

 

[aigomorla]

Your not going to get 3000:1 contrast on a nano ips..
Thats only possible on a VA.
However i really don't think you'll see it unless your in full bloated HDR mode.
And too much HDR can also be a bad thing... look at ASUS PG43UQ which has believe it or not, too much HDR.

But i am a IPS person.....
The only thing i would pick over a ips, is miniLED or OLED.....
So i am waiting for a very nice 4k miniLED that does not cost as much as the computer itself to come out to replace one of my IPS.

 

[biostud]

Your not going to get 3000:1 contrast on a nano ips..
Thats only possible on a VA.
However i really don't think you'll see it unless your in full bloated HDR mode.
And too much HDR can also be a bad thing... look at ASUS PG43UQ which has believe it or not, too much HDR.

But i am a IPS person.....
The only thing i would pick over a ips, is miniLED or OLED.....
So i am waiting for a very nice 4k miniLED that does not cost as much as the computer itself to come out to replace one of my IPS.

So not going for G9 Odyssey neo?

 

[aigomorla]

So not going for G9 Odyssey neo?

i want a 32inch 4k...
and even if its miniLED, you couldn't pry me away from my alienware 38 with Gsync Ultimate.

I don't even hit that cap 120fps in AAA titles on ultra settings with a 3090.

 

[Shmee]

My next upgrade will likely be a 1440p 240Hz IPS.

 

[hardcore_gamer29]

i want a 32inch 4k...
and even if its miniLED, you couldn't pry me away from my alienware 38 with Gsync Ultimate.

I don't even hit that cap 120fps in AAA titles on ultra settings with a 3090.

thats why i said no GPU currently in the market can give 120 fps that too in games like battlefield 2042 but i can turn off ray tracing

 

[Shmee]

The simple option is to turn down settings to high or medium high. I try to run pegged at 144 FPS in any game.

 

[hardcore_gamer29]

The simple option is to turn down settings to high or medium high. I try to run pegged at 144 FPS in any game.

yes i guess on 4k we can turn quality settings to even low as picture is already 4 times clearer than 1080p