New from Thermaltake

cirrus1

Senior member
Jul 26, 2000
662
0
0
Yes I have read the article. It looks good but I'd like to see a review of it first... :D
 

ericd

Senior member
Oct 8, 2000
355
0
0
I want to know where they came up with that fan....I mean 36 CFM with 31.5 dBA. This is the only fan in existence (that I know of) that has a positive CFM to dBA ratio. The closest competitor is an Adda with a .81 CFM/dBA ratio. Plus it moves within 3 CFM of my Panaflo H1A 80mm and within 1 dBA of it too. Where did they find these things?

Eric
 

Hanky

Senior member
Dec 29, 2000
306
0
0
I don't think this fan exists. It must be either a typo or a fake (maybe by Tt itself...we got used to bad things from them...).
 

Mikewarrior2

Diamond Member
Oct 20, 1999
7,132
0
0
Like I posted in general hardware, i think it'll be real funny if, in a socket-thermistor based review, this heatsink performs worse than the slighly-lower rated Super-Orb(according to Thermaltake's own ratings, which actually is fairly accurate).


Mike
 

toph99

Diamond Member
Aug 25, 2000
5,505
0
0
i don't believe that 31dba rating. it moves nearly the same amount of air as my Delta, has the same two ball bearing but draws have the current(or nearly half) :confused:

they must be using some super bearings or something like that, because i don't see how it can be done. then again i am no specialist in this stuff :p

i also remembered that this 60mm fan moves the same amount of air as my Antec 80mm's with 3dba less sound. i really don't see that...
 

GiZzO

Golden Member
Nov 6, 1999
1,789
0
0
i'll put money that this fan put out no where near 36cfm...im talking 22-24cfm, with its 4500 RPM speed thats what it should be.
 

ericd

Senior member
Oct 8, 2000
355
0
0
Generally the fan is rated without being mounted to anything....Gizzo correct me if I'm wrong on this. I look at the picture of that thing and I'm just not seeing anything special...no increased/decreased blade angle, no smaller fan hub, no twin turbine, no tiny turbo prop, no elves with amazing lungs, nothing. Bottom line is VH or HOCP or somebody needs to get their hands on one.

Eric
 

GiZzO

Golden Member
Nov 6, 1999
1,789
0
0
Guess-timate i would say poorly from the thermal resistance point of view:

Volcano II - 0.64 C/Watt

(3700 rpm fan)
Alpha 6035. - 0.37 C/Watt
Alpha PEP66 - 0.35 C/Watt

GlobalWin FOP32 - 0.38 C/Watt
GlobalWin FOP38 - 0.31 C/Watt

JMC Arctic Wind Plus - 0.60 C/Watt
AKA RDJD the volcano probably will perform about as good as this boy. Was reviewed in anandtechs last heatsink roundup i think. Yes yes even tho anand's bench are unacurate gives ya a rough example how it would be against the alpha.
 

GiZzO

Golden Member
Nov 6, 1999
1,789
0
0
Maybe this is a varible fan...thats really the only way. Then it could be blowing 36 CFM but at 46 dB! And the 31dB they have displayed there is when it blows 24cfm. If its that way they should have cheated there C/Watt score too im sure with a 36 CFM fan it can do better then 0.64 C/Watt.
 

Mikewarrior2

Diamond Member
Oct 20, 1999
7,132
0
0
well, one things for sure, the heatsink doesn't look that beefy. It may be a non-forged heatsink, which would further hinder performance.

It also doesn't appear to be much taller than the Taisol CEK733092.

And, lastly, Thermaltake Quality isn't exactly very high as far as relation to base-quality, which will probably hinder performance as well.

And then, their C/W ratings are usually fairly accurate.


Mike
 

GiZzO

Golden Member
Nov 6, 1999
1,789
0
0
Its about 8mm Taller then the Taisol 733, and 6mm taller then the FOP

Just the heatsink height without fan

Taisol 742 - 48mm <- Wide Mofo! 80mm
TT Volcano - 43mm
GW FOP.... - 37mm <- Wide 70mm
Taisol 733 - 35mm

Ya know the Volcano and the Taisol look alot a like, the clip/fins/structure, flip through these 2 links:
CEK733
Volcano II
 

Mikewarrior2

Diamond Member
Oct 20, 1999
7,132
0
0
Gizzo,

As far as fin height, the taisol is 38.1mm, while the thermaltake is 38.7. Fairly comparable fin-heigts..


Mike