New cheap ($50) card for htpc

nyfirefly11

Senior member
Jan 28, 2009
321
0
76
I'm turning my old rig into an htpc.

Here are the basic specs:
P4 550 (3.4ghz @ 800fsb)
Asus p4ad2 premium
2 GB ddr2-600
ATI x700

I'm thinking about upgrading the gpu for use with my older 37" panny plasma (108i), for basic video playback/streaming.

Here are 3 on newegg that seem good and reasonable:

gigabyte 9500 ($35 AR): http://www.newegg.com/Product/...x?Item=N82E16814125257

Sapphire 4650 ($50 AR): http://www.newegg.com/Product/...x?Item=N82E16814102805

Sapphire 4550 ($50): http://www.newegg.com/Product/...x?Item=N82E16814102819

The 4550 is passively cooled, which is nice, but the price on the 9500 is pretty awesome. I'll prob use this briefly in the old rig before I upgrade to a 285 in a few months.

Any thoughts? Or are they basically comparable? Thx!
 

Arkaign

Lifer
Oct 27, 2006
20,736
1,379
126
might want to upgrade that 108i display, what is that, 54p? Not very high res ;)

All kidding aside, if you have no intention of gaming, that 4550 with a fanless setup is probably the best move for a HTPC application. No fan to fuss about, which the cheap video cards with cheap fans can cake up and die early.
 

daveybrat

Elite Member
Super Moderator
Jan 31, 2000
5,804
1,015
126
Out of those options, i'd go with the Sapphire 4650. It's much faster in gaming than the 9500GT and i believe consumes less power.

That heatsink on the 4550 looks so dinky and small. It probably gets pretty warm.

Vote for 4650 :thumbsup:
 

Greg04

Golden Member
Jun 11, 2004
1,224
1
76
Originally posted by: nyfirefly11
I'm turning my old rig into an htpc.

Here are the basic specs:
P4 550 (3.4ghz @ 800fsb)
Asus p4ad2 premium
2 GB ddr2-600
ATI x700

I'm thinking about upgrading the gpu for use with my older 37" panny plasma (108i), for basic video playback/streaming.

Here are 3 on newegg that seem good and reasonable:

gigabyte 9500 ($35 AR): http://www.newegg.com/Product/...x?Item=N82E16814125257

Sapphire 4650 ($50 AR): http://www.newegg.com/Product/...x?Item=N82E16814102805

Sapphire 4550 ($50): http://www.newegg.com/Product/...x?Item=N82E16814102819

The 4550 is passively cooled, which is nice, but the price on the 9500 is pretty awesome. I'll prob use this briefly in the old rig before I upgrade to a 285 in a few months.

Any thoughts? Or are they basically comparable? Thx!

I have the 4550 in my Dell GX280 - only 25W and perfectly fine for my purposes. It even plays Pacific Fighters at 1600x1200 with "perfect water". I needed a low-profile card and could not be happier. BluRay and HD video works without a hiccup. I went the asus offering, but this looks fine.
 

Arkaign

Lifer
Oct 27, 2006
20,736
1,379
126
Originally posted by: daveybrat
Out of those options, i'd go with the Sapphire 4650. It's much faster in gaming than the 9500GT and i believe consumes less power.

That heatsink on the 4550 looks so dinky and small. It probably gets pretty warm.

Vote for 4650 :thumbsup:

I'd agree, but the OP doesn't want to game, just videos, so the extra power needed and the time to get the rebate back would both be somewhat in vain.
 

nyfirefly11

Senior member
Jan 28, 2009
321
0
76
thx everyone! Arkaign - agreed, at some point I need to upgrade the panny :)

no gaming on this rig, just netflix streaming, recording tv - the basics.
 

hans007

Lifer
Feb 1, 2000
20,212
18
81
the 4350 and 4550 are the same chip. I'd just go with that.

there are some 4350s on newegg for $30
 

nyfirefly11

Senior member
Jan 28, 2009
321
0
76
sorry, posted that before I saw the other one :)

this may be a silly question, but can you tell me in simple terms what PCM does?

sounds like I'll be going for 4350/4550.
 

Arkaign

Lifer
Oct 27, 2006
20,736
1,379
126
Originally posted by: nyfirefly11
thx everyone! Arkaign - agreed, at some point I need to upgrade the panny :)

no gaming on this rig, just netflix streaming, recording tv - the basics.

I was just joshing you on your typo. You put 108i instead of 1080i :) Which would imply something like a 220x108 screen resolution instead of 1920x1080 ;)

1080i is just fine.
 

nyfirefly11

Senior member
Jan 28, 2009
321
0
76
ha, woops. yeah, that tv would be pretty terrible. though I still wouldn't mind getting a new one, but it's fine for now.
 

s44

Diamond Member
Oct 13, 2006
9,427
16
81
Originally posted by: nyfirefly11
sorry, posted that before I saw the other one :)

this may be a silly question, but can you tell me in simple terms what PCM does?

sounds like I'll be going for 4350/4550.
PCM = uncompressed, CD-style sound

4xxx cards can do PCM over all 8 surround channels in HDMI. Previous ATI cards (and all Nvidia cards, though not all Nvidia mobos) just route SPDIF-style sound to the HDMI connection. This limits you to either 5.1 Dolby Digital or DTS (both lossy) or 2-channel PCM.

You may not have a surround setup yet, but for a few bucks keeping the option makes sense.
 

nyfirefly11

Senior member
Jan 28, 2009
321
0
76
I have a 5.1 setup with a good receiver (I'm pretty sure it has digital, pro logic and dts). That said, I'm planning on putting a sound card in this thing (either my old audigy 2zs or a new ht omega striker), so I could just route sound straight from that to my receiver via spdif, no?
 

s44

Diamond Member
Oct 13, 2006
9,427
16
81
You could, but SPDIF will only give you lossy surround. If you get the Striker, use the analog connections for full resolution (particularly noticable on Blu-Ray). Edit: oh, the Audigy has analog too, so same applies there.

From here on out, HDMI audio (lossless digital surround) is king. The days of discrete soundcards may be numbered, unless they work like the Asus Xonar.

Edit: obviously, you need an HDMI-enabled receiver for this, but we're a year or two away from every new surround receiver accepting HDMI audio.
 

nyfirefly11

Senior member
Jan 28, 2009
321
0
76
ah, that makes sense...didn't realize spdif was lossy. With the striker, which analog connectors are you talking about? (or is the basic Xonar better?)

The other problem is that my receiver doesn't have hdmi support - only component video/digital audio. I can run hdmi directly into my tv, and then send it back to the receiver using spdif, but that's the best I can do if I want full 5.1.
 

s44

Diamond Member
Oct 13, 2006
9,427
16
81
Both the cards you mentioned output 7.1 analog (see all those jacks?) as well as SPDIF. Your receiver almost certainly has surround analog inputs (as "DVD" or "multi channel" or something like that), so you should be able to run HDMI to the TV and 6 analog connectors to the receiver, both from the computer. Note that most receivers do NOT apply their speaker level/crossover processing to this signal, so you have to take care of that on the soundcard driver.

Of course, you won't notice unless you play back a lossless surround source -- Blu-Ray being the most common.
 

nyfirefly11

Senior member
Jan 28, 2009
321
0
76
got it, with you now. thx! if I'm not using blu ray, but just standard dvds, then I wouldn't notice?
 

s44

Diamond Member
Oct 13, 2006
9,427
16
81
Originally posted by: nyfirefly11
got it, with you now. thx! if I'm not using blu ray, but just standard dvds, then I wouldn't notice?
DVDs don't have room for lossless surround tracks anyway, so no.
 

nyfirefly11

Senior member
Jan 28, 2009
321
0
76
cool, so if I just used spdif, and didn't need pcm, i guess I could get the 3450. but maybe I'll get the 4350 just in case I get bluray and new receiver w/hdmi later...

thx!