New Boss same as the Old Boss

Status
Not open for further replies.

bfdd

Lifer
Feb 3, 2007
13,312
1
0
oh the lulz to be had with this article

http://www.foxbusiness.com/governme...es-eyed-in-hillstone-iraq-deal/#ixzz2AkG2ciR1

Now I understand that these things are bound to happen and I normally don't make much fuss over this, in fact there wouldn't be much fuss at all if the company had a resume to back up the lucrative contract they just scored. That's one key difference with this and the Haliburton deals that went on. Haliburton actually has quite the experienced resume, this company? Never even fucking heard of them. So to those of you out there who expected different when you so vehemently supported this current administration, are you fed up yet?
 

monovillage

Diamond Member
Jul 3, 2008
8,444
1
0
It's Not What You Know But Who You Know

Still, Richter concedes that the Obama Administration has played a role in landing the assignment for Hill—and that James Biden’s political skills often come in handy. The 100,000-unit development won by HillStone is part of a $35 billion, 500,000-unit project deal won by TRAC Development, a South Korean company that Richter says has close ties to the Iraqi government.

Richter says Hill has contacts in both Iraqi government and the State Department, the result of years of managing construction projects in the Middle East. As for which party was more responsible for helping the firm win the Iraqi deal, Richter said, “I don’t know who called who.”

But he does know that James Biden is a valuable employee—particularly when the government and his business overlap. “He knows how to deal with government officials; that’s his skill,” Richter said. “He makes people from foreign countries comfortable we’re not going to steal their money.”

“After all, he’s also been with his brother a long time,” Richter adds.

Having an older brother who’s the vice president certainly has its benefits. Analysts point to some lucrative deals directed to Hill from the federal government, including a $22 million contract awarded to Hill International earlier this month to manage the construction of offices for the State Department.

Maybe that's what ole Joe was laughing, giggling and smirking about during the VP debate, how him and his brother are screwing the American people.
 

Buxaroo

Member
Oct 2, 2012
32
0
0
oh the lulz to be had with this article

http://www.foxbusiness.com/governme...es-eyed-in-hillstone-iraq-deal/#ixzz2AkG2ciR1
Haliburton actually has quite the experienced resume

Your joking right?

http://fuelfix.com/blog/2010/11/09/spill-panel-bp-transocean-halliburton-made-egregious-mistakes/

http://www.rawstory.com/rs/2012/10/08/halliburtons-missing-nuclear-waste-found-alongside-texas-highway/

Halliburton charged with selling nuclear technology to Iran.

Pentagon auditors found a Halliburton Co. subsidiary gave faulty cost estimates on a $2.7 billion contract to serve American troops in Iraq and Kuwait, and company officials acknowledged making mistakes, Defense Department documents show.

http://asp.militarygear.com/2006/07/13/screwed-by-halliburton/


I can keep going and give you the shovel. There is a very good reason why Halliburton changed their name.


Maybe that's what ole Joe was laughing, giggling and smirking about during the VP debate, how him and his brother are screwing the American people.

And you didn't say anything when Cheney's Halliburton is on record for doing that exact same thing? Pot meet kettle.
 

monovillage

Diamond Member
Jul 3, 2008
8,444
1
0
Bu ...bu.........bu..........bu...........but............but.........but..........but Bush!

and WWYBYWB?
 

NoStateofMind

Diamond Member
Oct 14, 2005
9,711
6
76
oh the lulz to be had with this article

http://www.foxbusiness.com/governme...es-eyed-in-hillstone-iraq-deal/#ixzz2AkG2ciR1

Now I understand that these things are bound to happen and I normally don't make much fuss over this, in fact there wouldn't be much fuss at all if the company had a resume to back up the lucrative contract they just scored. That's one key difference with this and the Haliburton deals that went on. Haliburton actually has quite the experienced resume, this company? Never even fucking heard of them. So to those of you out there who expected different when you so vehemently supported this current administration, are you fed up yet?

I am. You are not.
 

bfdd

Lifer
Feb 3, 2007
13,312
1
0
Lol Buxaroo what point are you trying to make? You can post things Haliburton has done wrong and I can link to things they have done right. In fact you will hardly ever hear about the shit they have done right because well it just isn't something that is news worthy. I've worked along side Haliburton in the past in a gas field out in Bakersfield. Professional, much more so than a few other companies I've worked besides before. They fuck up, everyone fucks up, wah. Their resume and experience in the energy industry is still pretty good and I have no idea what the fuck you're talking about with a name change. They still trade under HAL and they still operate under Haliburton. http://www.halliburton.com/

PS great distraction from the main subject of the thread, which is you know how the Obama admin really hasn't done jack shit differently than the Bush admin, you just put a big shiny blue D behind them and everyone thinks it's all better.
 

Buxaroo

Member
Oct 2, 2012
32
0
0
Bu ...bu.........bu..........bu...........but............but.........but..........but Bush!

and WWYBYWB?

His company was awarded a 22 million dollar contract, hardly anything to get excited over. Not when you compare how much money the previous administration blew on mercs and Halliburton. And if your only response is that I am using the "Bush" card...so what? You cannot bitch about someone doing something that you yourself supported with your friends, who btw did FAR more damage than whatever paltry sums that the current administration is throwing the way of their friends. Sorry, Bush set the bar, and Obama has gone no where near that bar of blatant cronyism.
 

Buxaroo

Member
Oct 2, 2012
32
0
0
Lol Buxaroo what point are you trying to make? You can post things Haliburton has done wrong and I can link to things they have done right. In fact you will hardly ever hear about the shit they have done right because well it just isn't something that is news worthy. I've worked along side Haliburton in the past in a gas field out in Bakersfield. Professional, much more so than a few other companies I've worked besides before. They fuck up, everyone fucks up, wah. Their resume and experience in the energy industry is still pretty good and I have no idea what the fuck you're talking about with a name change. They still trade under HAL and they still operate under Haliburton. http://www.halliburton.com/

PS great distraction from the main subject of the thread, which is you know how the Obama admin really hasn't done jack shit differently than the Bush admin, you just put a big shiny blue D behind them and everyone thinks it's all better.

False equivalency. And just because a company is new, doesn't mean that the contracts should be given to the ones with the most experience. Halliburton wasn't experienced all that much either. But considering we are talking about a paltry sum, and a contract that can barely be described as vital to the war effort or whatever, it's not even worth the print. Talk to me when his company keeps getting the contracts and fails miserably at doing the job they were assigned to do.
 

bfdd

Lifer
Feb 3, 2007
13,312
1
0
His company was awarded a 22 million dollar contract, hardly anything to get excited over. Not when you compare how much money the previous administration blew on mercs and Halliburton. And if your only response is that I am using the "Bush" card...so what? You cannot bitch about someone doing something that you yourself supported with your friends, who btw did FAR more damage than whatever paltry sums that the current administration is throwing the way of their friends. Sorry, Bush set the bar, and Obama has gone no where near that bar of blatant cronyism.

Did you just say 22 million dollar contract? Explain why then does Hill International project that this contract will generate 1.5 billion in revenue? Not sure if srs? Also, blatant cronyism hasn't been something we've seen with Obama? lol we've seen plenty of it, it's just always pushed to the side as "not a big deal" because you know Obama.
 

bfdd

Lifer
Feb 3, 2007
13,312
1
0
Buxaroo, I'm not here to defend Haliburton consistently getting contracts. I was making the point that when they did get them, originally, they had a significant resume and experience portfolio backing them up. Do you disagree? You'd be a fucking idiot to disagree and you are an idiot for disagreeing. Fact is, this is the same kind of cronyism as the Bush admin you're just willing to turn a blind eye at it. Pathetic.

I have no love for the Bush admin or the Obama admin or the Clinton admin or any Admin that existed during my existence.
 

waggy

No Lifer
Dec 14, 2000
68,143
10
81
and you are surprised? nothing new nothing changes just the letter of the guy in office/


btw: stuff like this is one of the big reasons i am worried about romney being in office.
 

bfdd

Lifer
Feb 3, 2007
13,312
1
0
and you are surprised? nothing new nothing changes just the letter of the guy in office/


btw: stuff like this is one of the big reasons i am worried about romney being in office.

I'm not feeling to good about Romney cronyism either, but I don't think he'll win so we should be ok.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.