• We’re currently investigating an issue related to the forum theme and styling that is impacting page layout and visual formatting. The problem has been identified, and we are actively working on a resolution. There is no impact to user data or functionality, this is strictly a front-end display issue. We’ll post an update once the fix has been deployed. Thanks for your patience while we get this sorted.

New Benchmark Run

Ronin

Ronin

Diamond Member
I'm running with normal downloaded units, and I'll be doing a comparison with this and various other CPUs.

I have some x2's in house as well, but they're in 1U's, and currently being set up for a server farm, so I don't think I'll have a chance to give those a run just yet.

Expect results on Monday with my comparisons.
 
Inital runs show that the average WU time is ~2.62 (2h 37m), with the average being 1 WU per hour being submitted (48 hours, 48 WU).

Comparisons:
3.2DC (4 Processes) = 2h 37m
FX55 Stock = 1hr 48m
P4HT 3.6E (in a laptop - 2 Processes) = 2h 21m

I'll update with a full slate of comparisons tomorrow. Just wanted to give you guys a taste.
 
Update:

Checked my Setispy Log this morning, and was greeted with this:

5/9/2005 12:00:11 AM 14ja05aa.3574.27968.809642.48 9.624 15.760 0.441 4.083 2.647 100.00% 9 22.979 1 3.088 0 0.994 0 0.000
5/9/2005 1:41:26 AM 14ja05aa.3574.27921.86072.122 9.601 15.740 0.441 4.083 2.659 100.00% 12 24.757 0 2.939 1 1.001 1 8.673
5/9/2005 1:47:37 AM 14ja05aa.3574.28016.478398.94 9.647 15.780 0.440 4.084 2.659 100.00% 8 23.435 0 1.285 0 0.996 1 9.735
5/9/2005 1:59:44 AM 14ja05aa.3574.2818.629824.100 21.769 12.640 0.438 4.086 2.656 100.00% 12 24.315 0 1.417 0 0.969 0 0.000
5/9/2005 2:39:39 AM 14ja05aa.3574.2818.629824.190 21.769 12.640 0.438 4.086 2.652 100.00% 5 23.177 0 1.814 2 1.035 4 9.727
5/9/2005 4:21:31 AM 14ja05aa.3574.28064.153414.142 9.669 15.800 0.439 4.085 2.661 100.00% 8 26.082 0 1.481 3 1.048 0 0.000
5/9/2005 4:39:12 AM 14ja05aa.3574.21361.636060.142 6.452 13.020 0.437 4.087 2.652 100.00% 16 29.643 0 1.676 1 1.020 2 10.016
5/9/2005 5:19:32 AM 14ja05aa.3574.28642.323574.125 8.527 18.080 0.426 4.098 2.658 100.00% 4 24.603 0 1.378 2 1.230 0 0.000
5/9/2005 6:28:04 AM 14ja05aa.3574.3489.173554.231 22.082 12.640 0.438 4.086 2.644 100.00% 22 25.576 0 1.787 1 1.024 2 9.424
5/9/2005 7:00:15 AM 14ja05aa.3574.3632.222162.137 22.149 12.640 0.438 4.086 2.640 100.00% 24 25.244 0 1.723 1 1.024 2 9.424
5/9/2005 7:17:25 AM 14ja05aa.3574.19248.647150.81 5.464 13.020 0.437 4.087 2.628 100.00% 14 25.616 0 2.224 4 1.044 1 10.158
5/9/2005 8:02:20 AM 14ja05aa.3574.19874.479830.187 5.757 13.020 0.437 4.087 2.633 100.00% 6 24.859 0 1.256 2 1.028 0 0.000
5/9/2005 9:05:43 AM 14ja05aa.3574.19969.859632.215 5.801 13.020 0.437 4.087 2.635 100.00% 63 52.861 0 1.364 0 0.998 0 0.000
5/9/2005 9:38:28 AM 14ja05aa.3574.20017.536080.91 5.824 13.020 0.437 4.087 2.630 100.00% 7 24.547 0 2.627 0 0.986 0 0.000
5/9/2005 9:55:45 AM 14ja05aa.3574.20112.922168.200 5.868 13.020 0.437 4.087 2.632 100.00% 24 31.535 0 3.123 3 1.110 1 9.845
5/9/2005 10:40:49 AM 14ja05aa.3574.20160.584662.124 5.890 13.020 0.437 4.087 2.633 100.00% 7 23.906 0 1.576 1 1.018 0 0.000

What's so noticeable about that? That's 16 WU in ~10 hours.

In comparison, this is a Dual 2.8GHz Xeon box results for the same time frame:

5/9/2005 12:22:40 AM 08ja05aa.28575.13250.629824.75 0.470 13.600 0.554 3.984 4.790 100.00% 11 23.694 4 3.446 0 0.968 0 0.000
5/9/2005 2:42:33 AM 08ja05aa.28575.19520.1047142.66 2.669 18.330 0.426 4.098 4.825 100.00% 15 24.534 0 1.264 1 1.016 3 9.559
5/9/2005 3:22:53 AM 14ja05aa.3574.10802.667316.196 0.730 8.430 0.696 3.887 4.629 100.00% 10 24.954 2 3.812 1 1.024 0 0.000
5/9/2005 4:13:12 AM 14ja05aa.3574.18816.509654.250 5.262 13.020 0.437 4.087 4.695 100.00% 75 40.561 0 1.481 0 0.993 0 0.000
5/9/2005 5:09:43 AM 14ja05aa.3574.3986.915908.217 22.315 12.640 0.438 4.086 4.760 100.00% 6 24.212 0 1.678 1 1.022 1 8.781
5/9/2005 7:25:03 AM 24ja05ab.5461.6338.536080.86 6.124 15.070 0.466 4.059 4.692 100.00% 6 24.245 0 1.248 2 1.088 0 0.000
5/9/2005 8:05:56 AM 26ja05aa.16398.17714.61078.40 19.407 19.790 0.422 4.102 4.696 100.00% 6 23.331 0 1.688 2 1.070 0 0.000
5/9/2005 8:56:34 AM 26ja05aa.16398.25376.253394.249 22.988 19.790 0.422 4.102 4.698 100.00% 8 24.670 0 2.279 2 1.093 2 9.731
5/9/2005 9:56:07 AM 08ja05aa.28575.23025.804838.243 4.307 18.330 0.426 4.098 4.749 100.00% 150 56.371 0 1.275 4 1.138 0 0.000

7 WU difference (and I don't think the clock speed difference would make up that much). You'll also notice the WU time differences.
 
Idiot me was sitting here wondering how you could get 16 WUs in 10 hrs when the times are showing 2.6xx hrs each.... D'OH!, 4 processes 😱

So when are you going to be raffling that thing off? 😀


That Dual 2.8GHz Xeon(4.7xx hrs each) must be HT'ed too? 4 processes?
 
Originally posted by: Spacehead
Idiot me was sitting here wondering how you could get 16 WUs in 10 hrs when the times are showing 2.6xx hrs each.... D'OH!, 4 processes 😱

So when are you going to be raffling that thing off? 😀


That Dual 2.8GHz Xeon(4.7xx hrs each) must be HT'ed too? 4 processes?
Click to expand...


Yup, that's right. After a full proper 24 hours, I'll post again with total WU totals to compare the two.

It's definitely a crunching monster. I imagine I'll be asking for more soon (I got 3 boxes, but the other two are working on other things right now, and running Seti would be intrusive).
 
As promised:

P4D 3.2GHz - 35WU in 24 hours
P4HT 2.8GHz Xeon - 20WU in 24 hours

Simply no comparison.
 
I'm a little confused 😕

Were the WUs easier back in January?

I thought I was getting almost 25WU in 24 hours on my HT Dual Xeon 1.6@2.5

I might be mistaken, I'll have to try it again.
 
Originally posted by: Ronin
As promised:

P4D 3.2GHz - 35WU in 24 hours
P4HT 2.8GHz Xeon - 20WU in 24 hours

Simply no comparison.
Click to expand...
Daum! :Q

What would a P4D system like that cost?
/do i really want to know?/ :evil:
 
I couldn't tell you, to be honest. As you know, I get systems from AMD and Intel all the time (I received a Cual Opteron 275 yesterday that I haven't had the chance to put through it's paces (note that is a dual core setup, so you effectively get 4 CPUs). When I do, I'll provide some comparisons.

Here are some teasers, though.,

Opt275
Opt275
Opt275
Opt275

One thing to note. CPUZ doesn't recognize all 4GB of RAM (there are in fact 4 sticks of RAM in there). I'm guessing this is simply because it hasn't been updated yet (and Windows actually reports 2.75GB of RAM).
 
Originally posted by: Ronin
I couldn't tell you, to be honest. As you know, I get systems from AMD and Intel all the time (I received a Cual Opteron 275 yesterday that I haven't had the chance to put through it's paces (note that is a dual core setup, so you effectively get 4 CPUs). When I do, I'll provide some comparisons.

Here are some teasers, though.,

Opt275
Opt275
Opt275
Opt275

One thing to note. CPUZ doesn't recognize all 4GB of RAM (there are in fact 4 sticks of RAM in there). I'm guessing this is simply because it hasn't been updated yet (and Windows actually reports 2.75GB of RAM).
Click to expand...


IIRC windows doesn't list all of the ram when near 4 gigs, it reserves some for the page file and (reading in other forums) the programs that access it report the lesser amount as well.

old age may be playing with me though lol
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

TRENDING THREADS

Back
Top