Originally posted by: TheAudit
$3300, that's a wee bit.
Originally posted by: dnetmhz
Is Apple going to start their own mortgage company soon?
Originally posted by: TheAudit
$3300, that's a wee bit.
Originally posted by: sodcha0s
Originally posted by: TheAudit
$3300, that's a wee bit.
Mac logic..... "but we only need to sell one..."
:roll:
Originally posted by: Xiety
Originally posted by: sodcha0s
Originally posted by: TheAudit
$3300, that's a wee bit.
Mac logic..... "but we only need to sell one..."
:roll:
You do realize it would still be expensive as hell if it was for PCs. It's 30" and has an incredibly high resolution for LCDs. I think the price fits.
Originally posted by: Mik3y
all lcd's are hd, u just need a hd box to be able to view hd tv on it.
You do realize it would still be expensive as hell if it was for PCs. It's 30" and has an incredibly high resolution for LCDs. I think the price fits.
Originally posted by: bunnyfubbles
I'd still rather have this one
You do realize it would still be expensive as hell if it was for PCs. It's 30" and has an incredibly high resolution for LCDs. I think the price fits.
True, while the resolution doesn't beat the 3840x2400 (QUXGA-W) of the IBM, the price of the 30" Apple seems like a steal compared to the 22" IBM.
Originally posted by: 540mb
Originally posted by: bunnyfubbles
I'd still rather have this one
You do realize it would still be expensive as hell if it was for PCs. It's 30" and has an incredibly high resolution for LCDs. I think the price fits.
True, while the resolution doesn't beat the 3840x2400 (QUXGA-W) of the IBM, the price of the 30" Apple seems like a steal compared to the 22" IBM.
I played with that IBM monitor and the resoulution is CRAZY. At 3840x2400 I could barely read anything. I had to put my face real close to the screen to be able to read the xp start button. Oh yeah and the 5950 that it was hooked into was having a REAL hard time displaying stuff at the rez. In any case that monitor rocks.
Originally posted by: Nebor
Originally posted by: 540mb
Originally posted by: bunnyfubbles
I'd still rather have this one
You do realize it would still be expensive as hell if it was for PCs. It's 30" and has an incredibly high resolution for LCDs. I think the price fits.
True, while the resolution doesn't beat the 3840x2400 (QUXGA-W) of the IBM, the price of the 30" Apple seems like a steal compared to the 22" IBM.
I played with that IBM monitor and the resoulution is CRAZY. At 3840x2400 I could barely read anything. I had to put my face real close to the screen to be able to read the xp start button. Oh yeah and the 5950 that it was hooked into was having a REAL hard time displaying stuff at the rez. In any case that monitor rocks.
Where did you see it?
If you look at IBMs site, a 5950 won't work with that monitor...
