- Aug 21, 2002
- 18,368
- 11
- 81
I'm using Catalyst 4.7's... I used Driver Cleaner to remove all the nVidia stuff from my FX5900. Installed the 4.7 CAT's and reinstalled 3DMark cause I figured to do a quick check for functionality I'd run 3DMark2003. Frame rates are lower than I expected, and it fails the Mother Nature test. Kicks me back to the desktop and gives me the message... "DrawIndexedPrimitive failed - Out of video memory"
Is this more likely an issue with the 4.7 drivers or 3DMark or a problem with the installation since I didn't reinstall Windows.
Oh... it DID reinstall Direct X when I installed the ATI drivers for the first time. Far Cry works, although, seems a lot slower than my overclocked FX5900.
Any ideas?
*UPDATE*
I settled on a speed of 386/361... a WHOPPING 9 MHz overclock on the core! Beyond that I get white sparklies, mostly where PS2.0 is used. Get tearing beyond 361 MHz, but that's a 24 MHz increase... not great, but better than 9
I wonder if I'd get much more out of it by putting one of those big ass VGA Silencers on it.
Oh, and 3DMark2003 works again too... 6162... for some reason my CPU score is A LOT lower with this 9800 Pro. Odd that the video card should effect the CPU measurements...
Is this more likely an issue with the 4.7 drivers or 3DMark or a problem with the installation since I didn't reinstall Windows.
Oh... it DID reinstall Direct X when I installed the ATI drivers for the first time. Far Cry works, although, seems a lot slower than my overclocked FX5900.
Any ideas?
*UPDATE*
I settled on a speed of 386/361... a WHOPPING 9 MHz overclock on the core! Beyond that I get white sparklies, mostly where PS2.0 is used. Get tearing beyond 361 MHz, but that's a 24 MHz increase... not great, but better than 9
I wonder if I'd get much more out of it by putting one of those big ass VGA Silencers on it.
Oh, and 3DMark2003 works again too... 6162... for some reason my CPU score is A LOT lower with this 9800 Pro. Odd that the video card should effect the CPU measurements...
