• We’re currently investigating an issue related to the forum theme and styling that is impacting page layout and visual formatting. The problem has been identified, and we are actively working on a resolution. There is no impact to user data or functionality, this is strictly a front-end display issue. We’ll post an update once the fix has been deployed. Thanks for your patience while we get this sorted.

NEW 10,000 RPM SATA 80GB

Actually it might be a Western Digital Raptor

i know someone made a thread about a month ago where he opened up his computer (either a dell or a gateway) and it had a 80GB Raptor drive........ he even emailed western digital and they confirmed it was a raptor
(these can only be found in retail systems such as dells)
 
I just found the other thread. I google'd and didn't find much, so I posted here without digging. Sorry.

These are so much cheaper on dell's site vs. the regular raptors.

 
After the coupon I got in the mail 120.xx shipped.

It doesn't do me any good since I already have one raptor that I want to stripe.

 
It's a Raptor. Do a search on Dell for a 74GB Raptor and check the stats side by side with this non branded 10k rpm drive. It's pretty much a carbon copy of the Raptor. Seeing as there are no announced 10k rpm HD's from Seagate, Maxtor or Hitachi, it's unlikely that one of them made this drive.
 
Raptors already have been defeated, unless you prefer synthetic results to real world results.

In real world testing (the only tests that actually matter), the Seagate 7200.8s are faster than Raptors. While still being cheaper and having much more storage space.
http://www.anandtech.com/storage/showdoc.aspx?i=2396&p=13

Raptors are fast, and great drives. But overhyped.
Real world testing is all that matters and there are faster drives out there. Not to mention my two 200GB 7200.8s in RAID-0 are near silent.
While remaining faster than a Raptor (or even RAID-0 Raptors), and at about $100 a pop, only $50 more than a single Raptor (and a $150 raptor is the price with mail in rebates).

Put two 200GB 7200.8s in RAID-0 for $200 or so, get NCQ and 5 year warranty. Not bad.
 
Southpawni you're full of crap and proven wrong by your own reference.

The Raptor beats the 7200.8 in the majority of benchmarks, including the other non-synthetic ones.

Not to mention ~2x faster seek times
 
Originally posted by: Frackal
Southpawni you're full of crap and proven wrong by your own reference.

The Raptor beats the 7200.8 in the majority of benchmarks, including the other non-synthetic ones.

I checked his link and I'm not sure where you're seeing that the Raptor beat the Seagate in a majority of benchmarks. Make sure to read the note under the title of the benchmark to see which are "lower is better" and which are "higher is better".
 
So here is my delemma now.... I just got an 80 gig raptor.... i already opened it tested it... but havent used it (only formatted and put 1 file on it) .... should i sell it on ebay for like 150 or whatever i can get for it and buy this drive? ...... 🙁
 
Originally posted by: AmberClad
Originally posted by: Frackal
Southpawni you're full of crap and proven wrong by your own reference.

The Raptor beats the 7200.8 in the majority of benchmarks, including the other non-synthetic ones.

I checked his link and I'm not sure where you're seeing that the Raptor beat the Seagate in a majority of benchmarks. Make sure to read the note under the title of the benchmark to see which are "lower is better" and which are "higher is better".

You're actually the one who needs to re-read. There are more than 3 benchmarks to that review.


Here I'll list them out, from pages of the same review




Raptor wins this set of benchmarks from that review


Raptor wins this set too


And this set


And this one


Wins 1/2


Some go to Raptor, some to others


Raptor wins all 5 here

etc etc...

And that's about all there is for that review

 
Originally posted by: Frackal
Not to mention ~2x faster seek times

That's the key.

But it is still slow in comparison to my Cheetah 15k.4's 😀

If you aren't doing any disk intensive I/O you won't realize any difference.
 
Originally posted by: Frackal

Originally posted by: AmberClad
Originally posted by: Frackal
Southpawni you're full of crap and proven wrong by your own reference.

The Raptor beats the 7200.8 in the majority of benchmarks, including the other non-synthetic ones.

I checked his link and I'm not sure where you're seeing that the Raptor beat the Seagate in a majority of benchmarks. Make sure to read the note under the title of the benchmark to see which are "lower is better" and which are "higher is better".

You're actually the one who needs to re-read. There are more than 3 benchmarks to that review.


Here I'll list them out, from pages of the same review




Raptor wins this set of benchmarks from that review

Raptor wins this set too

And this set

And this one


etc etc...

And that's about all there is for that review

Wins 1/2

Some go to Raptor, some to others

Lol, you seem to have ignored the benchs that the Raptor lost in, including the all important gaming benchs. I've always thought that those people who dished out hundred of dollars for a Raptor or two did it to improve gaming performance. I don't know anyone who buys a Raptor for business apps.
 
Originally posted by: AmberClad
Originally posted by: Frackal

Originally posted by: AmberClad
Originally posted by: Frackal
Southpawni you're full of crap and proven wrong by your own reference.

The Raptor beats the 7200.8 in the majority of benchmarks, including the other non-synthetic ones.

I checked his link and I'm not sure where you're seeing that the Raptor beat the Seagate in a majority of benchmarks. Make sure to read the note under the title of the benchmark to see which are "lower is better" and which are "higher is better".

You're actually the one who needs to re-read. There are more than 3 benchmarks to that review.


Here I'll list them out, from pages of the same review




Raptor wins this set of benchmarks from that review

Raptor wins this set too

And this set

And this one


etc etc...

And that's about all there is for that review

Wins 1/2

Some go to Raptor, some to others

Lol, you seem to have ignored the benchs that the Raptor lost in, including the all important gaming benchs. I've always thought that those people who dished out hundred of dollars for a Raptor or two did it to improve gaming performance. I don't know anyone who buys a Raptor for business apps.

I said the Raptor wins in the majority of benchmarks.

You said I was mistaken.

I wasn't and proved why.

Now you're arguing about the 3/25+ benchmarks that are gaming load times.


In my logic class we call that obfuscation
 
Originally posted by: southpawuni
Raptors already have been defeated, unless you prefer synthetic results to real world results.

In real world testing (the only tests that actually matter), the Seagate 7200.8s are faster than Raptors. While still being cheaper and having much more storage space.
http://www.anandtech.com/storage/showdoc.aspx?i=2396&p=13

Raptors are fast, and great drives. But overhyped.
Real world testing is all that matters and there are faster drives out there. Not to mention my two 200GB 7200.8s in RAID-0 are near silent.
While remaining faster than a Raptor (or even RAID-0 Raptors), and at about $100 a pop, only $50 more than a single Raptor (and a $150 raptor is the price with mail in rebates).

Put two 200GB 7200.8s in RAID-0 for $200 or so, get NCQ and 5 year warranty. Not bad.

You must not own a raptor yourself. I have used both the raptor and the DM10 (which should be even faster than the 7200.8) as my windows drive. I don't care about benchmark either, but you can definately feel the different in responsiness of the system.
 
Originally posted by: Frackal
Originally posted by: AmberClad
Originally posted by: Frackal

Originally posted by: AmberClad
Originally posted by: Frackal
Southpawni you're full of crap and proven wrong by your own reference.

The Raptor beats the 7200.8 in the majority of benchmarks, including the other non-synthetic ones.

I checked his link and I'm not sure where you're seeing that the Raptor beat the Seagate in a majority of benchmarks. Make sure to read the note under the title of the benchmark to see which are "lower is better" and which are "higher is better".

You're actually the one who needs to re-read. There are more than 3 benchmarks to that review.


Here I'll list them out, from pages of the same review




Raptor wins this set of benchmarks from that review

Raptor wins this set too

And this set

And this one


etc etc...

And that's about all there is for that review

Wins 1/2

Some go to Raptor, some to others

Lol, you seem to have ignored the benchs that the Raptor lost in, including the all important gaming benchs. I've always thought that those people who dished out hundred of dollars for a Raptor or two did it to improve gaming performance. I don't know anyone who buys a Raptor for business apps.

I said the Raptor wins in the majority of benchmarks.

You said I was mistaken.

I wasn't and proved why.

Now you're arguing about the 3/25+ benchmarks that are gaming load times.


In my logic class we call that obfuscation

Who cares. For the price, there are much better options for much more storage as listed above.
 
Originally posted by: Frackal
I said the Raptor wins in the majority of benchmarks.

You said I was mistaken.

I wasn't and proved why.

Now you're arguing about the 3/25+ benchmarks that are gaming load times.


In my logic class we call that obfuscation

*shrug* Those gaming load times are the ones that are most relevant as far as the Raptor is concerned. Like I said, I don't know anyone who buys them for anything other than maxing out their gaming performance. I'm seriously going to laugh if you were to tell me that you spent all that money on your Raptors to run business applications. Many of those other benchs are business related apps, so it's a bit of a moot point. At any rate, enjoy your Raptors 😉...
 
I figured there would be a bunch of whiny Raptor users coming in here after I posted those results.

People buy Raptors for gaming, in most cases.
In gaming, they arent faster.. and they are small drives (AND louder and more expensive as well).

The 7200.8s hold their own in the other tests, but the most important one.. level loading they win hands down.
I would wager 90% of the people who buy raptors buy them thinking it will increase gaming performance such as level loads.

If you are doing real hardcore business work with disk i/o intensive requirements.. you generally will be doing that at work where they will have something a bit more heavy duty anyway.. as in RAID 5 or something so you have mirroring and striping.
And they probably wouldnt use Raptors in that environment, being such small drives.

I have 400GB of space, and these 2 200GB 7200.8's are plenty fast.. esp in RAID-0.
So like AmberClad said.. enjoy your Raptors.
But after reading that review of the Seagate I knew which one was the better buy.


Way more space, way more quiet (silent), faster in gaming, cheaper and a 5 year warranty from Seagate.
No slouch in the benchs that matter, and faster in the most important one to most home users. Like I said if you need SERIOUS I/O performance for work, you probably need redundancy regardless as it probably pays your bills? Not to mention 80GB isnt much space for video editing or 3d work.
 
Originally posted by: AmberClad
Originally posted by: Frackal
I said the Raptor wins in the majority of benchmarks.

You said I was mistaken.

I wasn't and proved why.

Now you're arguing about the 3/25+ benchmarks that are gaming load times.


In my logic class we call that obfuscation

*shrug* Those gaming load times are the ones that are most relevant as far as the Raptor is concerned. Like I said, I don't know anyone who buys them for anything other than maxing out their gaming performance. I'm seriously going to laugh if you were to tell me that you spent all that money on your Raptors to run business applications. Many of those other benchs are business related apps, so it's a bit of a moot point. At any rate, enjoy your Raptors 😉...


I bought mine for overall system performance, and at that, they are the best SATA drives out there. Including boot times as well

I would not trade 1-2 secs difference in game loading times for slower performance in almost every other area, not to mention double the seek time
 
Originally posted by: Frackal
I bought mine for overall system performance, and at that, they are the best SATA drives out there.

I would not trade 1-2 secs difference in game loading times for slower performance in almost every other area, not to mention double the seek time

As long as you can justify buying into the Raptor hype that they are the best drives going.. then great.

Small drives with a hefty price tag, no 5 year warranty and you still have slower gaming drives than me regardless.
Kinda sad considering I have 250GB more space than you do as well. At half the price.

You can talk all you want, but for such supposedly superior drives its damn sad they cant even beat a cheaper drive with a 5 year warranty in level loads.

More than likely, you didnt read or pay attention to that review before plopping down $400 or so for two 74GB Raptors. 😀
 
Originally posted by: southpawuni
I figured there would be a bunch of whiny Raptor users coming in here after I posted those results.

People buy Raptors for gaming, in most cases.
In gaming, they arent faster.. and they are small drives (AND louder and more expensive as well).

If you had said the 7200.8 drives were competitive with raptors I wouldnt have responded, but you said they basically made them "old technology" which is absurd given that Raptors win in the large majority of every benchmark posted.

The 7200.8's shine in the doom 3 level, but in the other two they only exceed by

1.3 seconds faster in HL2

1.7 seconds in C&C.

And they lose in almost everything else.

I wouldn't buy a drive because it goes 1 sec. faster in level loading and loses nearly everything else, nor would I call it better than a raptor. I can't hear my raptor anyway.
 
Back
Top