Originally posted by: Frackal
Southpawni you're full of crap and proven wrong by your own reference.
The Raptor beats the 7200.8 in the majority of benchmarks, including the other non-synthetic ones.
Originally posted by: AmberClad
Originally posted by: Frackal
Southpawni you're full of crap and proven wrong by your own reference.
The Raptor beats the 7200.8 in the majority of benchmarks, including the other non-synthetic ones.
I checked his link and I'm not sure where you're seeing that the Raptor beat the Seagate in a majority of benchmarks. Make sure to read the note under the title of the benchmark to see which are "lower is better" and which are "higher is better".
Originally posted by: Frackal
Not to mention ~2x faster seek times
Originally posted by: Frackal
Originally posted by: AmberClad
Originally posted by: Frackal
Southpawni you're full of crap and proven wrong by your own reference.
The Raptor beats the 7200.8 in the majority of benchmarks, including the other non-synthetic ones.
I checked his link and I'm not sure where you're seeing that the Raptor beat the Seagate in a majority of benchmarks. Make sure to read the note under the title of the benchmark to see which are "lower is better" and which are "higher is better".
You're actually the one who needs to re-read. There are more than 3 benchmarks to that review.
Here I'll list them out, from pages of the same review
Raptor wins this set of benchmarks from that review
Raptor wins this set too
And this set
And this one
etc etc...
And that's about all there is for that review
Wins 1/2
Some go to Raptor, some to others
Originally posted by: AmberClad
Originally posted by: Frackal
Originally posted by: AmberClad
Originally posted by: Frackal
Southpawni you're full of crap and proven wrong by your own reference.
The Raptor beats the 7200.8 in the majority of benchmarks, including the other non-synthetic ones.
I checked his link and I'm not sure where you're seeing that the Raptor beat the Seagate in a majority of benchmarks. Make sure to read the note under the title of the benchmark to see which are "lower is better" and which are "higher is better".
You're actually the one who needs to re-read. There are more than 3 benchmarks to that review.
Here I'll list them out, from pages of the same review
Raptor wins this set of benchmarks from that review
Raptor wins this set too
And this set
And this one
etc etc...
And that's about all there is for that review
Wins 1/2
Some go to Raptor, some to others
Lol, you seem to have ignored the benchs that the Raptor lost in, including the all important gaming benchs. I've always thought that those people who dished out hundred of dollars for a Raptor or two did it to improve gaming performance. I don't know anyone who buys a Raptor for business apps.
Originally posted by: southpawuni
Raptors already have been defeated, unless you prefer synthetic results to real world results.
In real world testing (the only tests that actually matter), the Seagate 7200.8s are faster than Raptors. While still being cheaper and having much more storage space.
http://www.anandtech.com/storage/showdoc.aspx?i=2396&p=13
Raptors are fast, and great drives. But overhyped.
Real world testing is all that matters and there are faster drives out there. Not to mention my two 200GB 7200.8s in RAID-0 are near silent.
While remaining faster than a Raptor (or even RAID-0 Raptors), and at about $100 a pop, only $50 more than a single Raptor (and a $150 raptor is the price with mail in rebates).
Put two 200GB 7200.8s in RAID-0 for $200 or so, get NCQ and 5 year warranty. Not bad.
Originally posted by: Frackal
Originally posted by: AmberClad
Originally posted by: Frackal
Originally posted by: AmberClad
Originally posted by: Frackal
Southpawni you're full of crap and proven wrong by your own reference.
The Raptor beats the 7200.8 in the majority of benchmarks, including the other non-synthetic ones.
I checked his link and I'm not sure where you're seeing that the Raptor beat the Seagate in a majority of benchmarks. Make sure to read the note under the title of the benchmark to see which are "lower is better" and which are "higher is better".
You're actually the one who needs to re-read. There are more than 3 benchmarks to that review.
Here I'll list them out, from pages of the same review
Raptor wins this set of benchmarks from that review
Raptor wins this set too
And this set
And this one
etc etc...
And that's about all there is for that review
Wins 1/2
Some go to Raptor, some to others
Lol, you seem to have ignored the benchs that the Raptor lost in, including the all important gaming benchs. I've always thought that those people who dished out hundred of dollars for a Raptor or two did it to improve gaming performance. I don't know anyone who buys a Raptor for business apps.
I said the Raptor wins in the majority of benchmarks.
You said I was mistaken.
I wasn't and proved why.
Now you're arguing about the 3/25+ benchmarks that are gaming load times.
In my logic class we call that obfuscation
Originally posted by: Frackal
I said the Raptor wins in the majority of benchmarks.
You said I was mistaken.
I wasn't and proved why.
Now you're arguing about the 3/25+ benchmarks that are gaming load times.
In my logic class we call that obfuscation
Originally posted by: AmberClad
Originally posted by: Frackal
I said the Raptor wins in the majority of benchmarks.
You said I was mistaken.
I wasn't and proved why.
Now you're arguing about the 3/25+ benchmarks that are gaming load times.
In my logic class we call that obfuscation
*shrug* Those gaming load times are the ones that are most relevant as far as the Raptor is concerned. Like I said, I don't know anyone who buys them for anything other than maxing out their gaming performance. I'm seriously going to laugh if you were to tell me that you spent all that money on your Raptors to run business applications. Many of those other benchs are business related apps, so it's a bit of a moot point. At any rate, enjoy your Raptors 😉...
Originally posted by: Frackal
I bought mine for overall system performance, and at that, they are the best SATA drives out there.
I would not trade 1-2 secs difference in game loading times for slower performance in almost every other area, not to mention double the seek time
Originally posted by: southpawuni
I figured there would be a bunch of whiny Raptor users coming in here after I posted those results.
People buy Raptors for gaming, in most cases.
In gaming, they arent faster.. and they are small drives (AND louder and more expensive as well).