jfall: My scroll works in NS6. Strange.
josphstalinator: Give me ONE example. I've got one for you! Look at
http://www.datldoit.com/hotstuff.htm in IE, then Netscape 4.x. The navbar doesn't work in Netscape 4.x. I don't fault Netscape for this, I fault Dat'l Do It for bad code, but since Netscape 6 has the same tolerance for bad code that IE has, it WORKS in NS6! I've never had a page that worked in IE not work in NS6, so again I ask you to give me an example.
Here's another example for you: Look at <a target=new href="http://www.viahardware.com
">http://www.viahardware.com</a> in an old version of Netscape and then look at it in Netscape 6. Does it load at all for you in old Netscape 4.x? Doesn't for me. Works in 6, though.
beb: Slow? It's actually faster because old Netscapes would wait until the images INSIDE a table would load before loading the table or anything after the table. NS6 will load the images when they load and allow everything around the images to load as well. For this, it's been FASTER for me. Then again, I'm on broadband so most things aren't slow to start with.
Mule: You never even tried it did you? Because if you did, then you would no that 1) AOL IM is NOT built in. During a custom install, you simply don't check the IM box. 2) You can load the Classic Skin for NS6 so it looks JUST LIKE NS 4.x. 3) IE 5.5 is compatible with a lot of things because a lot of webmasters have bad form and don't follow W3C guidelines and IE is tolerant to these typos, but NS now allows these same errors of bad form so all of the same "compatabilities" are there (see examples left for josphstalinator). 4) NS6 has form memory too. Every password box you fill out or any fill in the blank you do, NS will ask you if you want to remember the data punched in. But you didn't know that because you really didn't try it, did you?
It seems almost as if no one here has really even tried it, but wants to bad mouth it anyway.
Zealots.