Netanyuhu finally forced to lay his BS on the line.

[Matt1970]

Lemon Law excuses Palestinian children strapping bombs to thier back and blowing them up in public places as Tit-4-Tat violence. Nuff said.

 

[Hayabusa Rider]

As you perceive with crystal clarity all Taliban atrocities while turning a total blind eye towards very similar Nato atrocities.

The difference is that if someone in NATO were to pull what the Taliban does they would be subject to trial and punishment whereas the Taliban would approve. Terrorizing the populace when it's seen as a useful method of control is SOP.

 

[JohnOfSheffield]

Directly personal and a statement advocating the termination of a fellow forum member's life.

You're not a very bright feller, are ya.

I'm not wasting words or thoughts on this, the answer is NO.

 

[JohnOfSheffield]

Pardon me, JOS if I perceive, that your fanaticism and Taliban fanaticism are just the opposite sides of the same counterfeit coin. As you perceive with crystal clarity all Taliban atrocities while turning a total blind eye towards very similar Nato atrocities.

While the judge , jury, and executioner of the verdict is not you or I, and instead is the Afghan people who hoped Nato would be a better alternative than the Taliban.

There is no one so blind as those that will not see, as you fail to ask or even understand why Nato failed to win the hearts or minds of the Afghan people by being even worse than the Taliban.

But still we are getting far afield of the Israeli questions being asked on this thread. Proving some Palestinians were wrong in the past does nothing to prove the Israeli government is right now. As you have the same failing counterfeit argument regarding Israel as you had in Afghanistan.

Is there a dimes worth of difference between the Nazis and the present Israeli government as both demanded a total win when others like me envision a win win for both sides in mutual co-operation. The entire mideast has a common problem, a lack of water and the engineering to solve the problem. The Israeli idea that anything good for surrounding states is bad for Israel is dead end stinking thinking that is unsustainable for a Israeli State in the fullness of time.

I'm sorry, you pathetic retard of an excuse of a human being but THIS DISCUSSION IS OVER, i have no time for the likes of you.

 

[JohnOfSheffield]

The difference is that if someone in NATO were to pull what the Taliban does they would be subject to trial and punishment whereas the Taliban would approve. Terrorizing the populace when it's seen as a useful method of control is SOP.

I've walked through camps with very young girls raped and shot through their vagina, the difference is, we don't rape and maim civilians...

UK soldiers that is, the likes of Nebor are always implicated in the trials where soliders do things that are wrong, they are retarded little twats who could not follow an order if their life depended on it and completely useless as backup because they cannot follow a direct order.

Unfortunately, what was once a real problem is now a minor issue because of the US recruitment.

People like them should never be allowed to join.

 

[sm625]

Excuse me, I am not antisemitic, or pro Arab either, but when I apply my American values of fairness, it has nothing to do with antisemitism and everything to do with the behavior of the Present Israeli government.

You gotta get with the "programming". You are anti-semitic if you criticize israel in any way.

 

[kylebisme]

For example, in Israel, they'll set up a 'totally fair and free' policy on buying land anyone can do

No, Israel's never had anything of the sort, see Israel upholds legality of Jews-only housing complex in Jaffa for a recent example to the contrary.

 

[kylebisme]

The difference is that if someone in NATO were to pull what the Taliban does they would be subject to trial

Here's a recent thread about an example to the contrary.

 

[JohnOfSheffield]

No, Israel's never had anything of the sort, see Israel upholds legality of Jews-only housing complex in Jaffa for a recent example to the contrary.

It's even worse in the US as a comparison.

Not that you'd care, you just hate Jews.

 

[kylebisme]

I don't hate anyone. As for you're comparison, how do you figure? Please site your sources.

 

[JohnOfSheffield]

Here's a recent thread about an example to the contrary.

So he didn't go on trial?

Wow, are you really able to change truth in your mind so much that you think you can convince others of your percieved truth that has nothing to do with reality.

Not only was he charged and on trial, he was convicted too.

Not that you'll ever understand any of this, your mind is just fucked up.

 

[chucky2]

We have Jew only housing complex here? Never knew that...

 

[JohnOfSheffield]

I don't hate anyone. As for you're comparison, how do you figure? Please site your sources.

First of all, learn the language, then we can talk.

It's not like i'm disrespecting you as the taliban sympathizer and terrorist hugger you are, it's just that i want to figure out your adress so i can fuck you up in real life.

Wait, i didn't mean that, i meant, so that i can argue against you.


Posting physical threats likes this (publicly or by pm) is vacationable. You know this because you served a 1 month vacation for it in the past. Time for another one to refresh your memory on how not to behave here.

Administrator Idontcare

 

[JohnOfSheffield]

We have Jew only housing complex here? Never knew that...

Only some know that... apparently, it seems it takes a sort of extra special stupid to know.

 

[kylebisme]

So he didn't go on trial?

Wow, are you really able to change truth in your mind so much that you think you can convince others of your percieved truth that has nothing to do with reality.

Not only was he charged and on trial, he was convicted too.

Not that you'll ever understand any of this, your mind is just fucked up.

Actaully was my quoting that was fucked up, I'd meant to include Hayabusa's "and punishment".

 

[Hayabusa Rider]

Actaully was my quoting that was fucked up, I'd meant to include Hayabusa's "and punishment".

I can probably find an exception to the Taliban being vicious bastards as well. I'm not sure exactly what happened because there's a lot of "he said, she said", but even if the people in the other thread got away with literal murder you'll not find that being the rule. If you think there's a real equivalency between how NATO conducts itself and the Taliban there's not a lot of room for discussion.

 

[JohnOfSheffield]

Actaully was my quoting that was fucked up, I'd meant to include Hayabusa's "and punishment".

Your pants should be on fire right about now.

You are the most pathetic man i have ever come across, the level of disdain i have for you is quite incredible..

May you be tortured to death in a hellhole of your choosing.

 

[chucky2]

Only some know that... apparently, it seems it takes a sort of extra special stupid to know.

Sorry, don't get what you're saying here. Where you being sarcastic in your post on this I responded to? We don't have public <insert religion or ethnicity> complexes here in the US, you cannot discriminate (in law, which is in theory) when publically selling property. If you want a white catholic to buy your house and a black muslim puts up a fair and reasonable offer on it, you can't say, Sorry, whites/catholics only. That's illegal.

Now, if you have a private commune, then Yes, you can have that as you wish.

Chuck

 

[JohnOfSheffield]

I can probably find an exception to the Taliban being vicious bastards as well. I'm not sure exactly what happened because there's a lot of "he said, she said", but even if the people in the other thread got away with literal murder you'll not find that being the rule. If you think there's a real equivalency between how NATO conducts itself and the Taliban there's not a lot of room for discussion.

If you really want to know, i can provide all parts of the reports on the matter as it is complete with names and time.

It'll be a boring read.

 

[JohnOfSheffield]

Sorry, don't get what you're saying here. Where you being sarcastic in your post on this I responded to? We don't have public <insert religion or ethnicity> complexes here in the US, you cannot discriminate (in law, which is in theory) when publically selling property. If you want a white catholic to buy your house and a black muslim puts up a fair and reasonable offer on it, you can't say, Sorry, whites/catholics only. That's illegal.

Now, if you have a private commune, then Yes, you can have that as you wish.

Chuck

Hurr durr durr, herp derp HERP!

I hate chavs.

 

[chucky2]

Okey dokey then...

 

[Hayabusa Rider]

If you really want to know, i can provide all parts of the reports on the matter as it is complete with names and time.

It'll be a boring read.

Reports are always boring, you know that

What I'd like to know is how revealing and conclusive they are. I haven't gone through them.

 

[kylebisme]

even if the people in the other thread got away with literal murder you'll not find that being the rule.

I've found the opposite, trials seem to the exception rather than the rule, and convictions with fitting punishments a tiny fraction of that. Heck, we've even had a forum member recently brag of killing people in Afghanistan for "shits and giggles".

 

[Hayabusa Rider]

I've found the opposite, trials seem to the exception rather than the rule, and convictions with fitting punishments a tiny fraction of that. Heck, we've even had a forum member recently brag of killing people in Afghanistan for "shits and giggles".

Well when NATO soldiers put a rifle up a girls vagina and pull the trigger to terrorize a community to keep them in check they are recognized as just doing their job and there's no fuss? I'd like to see that. On second thought no one should, and that's a good reason to act against the taliban. There's a reason you don't see trials for these kinds of things. They almost never happen and castrating boys with a dull knife isn't looked upon kindly. The Taliban exists because it will ruthlessly torture its opposition and fear is how they hold power. If NATO with their resources were to do that there would be bits of hacked up bodies blocking the streets. Cruelty is the exception for NATO but the rule for the Taliban.

 

[kylebisme]

Yes, NATO has the resources to be far less brutal than the Taliban in asserting their dominance, but they're still nowhere close to the paragons of virtue that your previous post suggested.