neo2 owners and 216,233, and 250 memory support

[Duvie]

Have you guys verified these in fact work???

I am using Bios 1A3 and I have the options but.....

I have set it to 233 at 11x233=(2563mhz)....ram speed should be 513ddr (256.3).....

Now Cpu_z reads it wrong...wont even display the speed or cpu/divider...

Sissoft sandra I think is the clsest to reporting ram speed but for 512ddr even at cas 3-3-3-8 seems a bit l;ow at 6600.... considering I get 6400's with 200 divider selected at 11x236. That is only 472ddr ubt cas 2.5....

Everest is waaaay off...It only reads like 5000 and puts me below a p4 2.8c setup....

Now in testing using cyrstalmark my scores of 13000+ in mem scores seems to show that it may be working....


Just a bit confused ad wondering if others are using the 216,233 or 250 dividers and whether they know it is working right....


UPDATE: TEST....

200 & 233 cas 2.5-4-4-8

*250 cas 3-5-4-10 (needed it to be stable)

APPLICATION-----------------200 (466DDR)-----------233(513DDR)------------250(570DDR)*

3DMARK2K1SE-------------------22614---------------------22429--------------------22840

CINEBENCH 2003-----------------679------------------------680-----------------------680

SUPERPI 4MB--------------------2:48.781-----------------2:47.453----------------2:45.859

TMPGENC 2.52--------------------1:15--------------------1:14--------------------
:15

 

[Duvie]

dropped timings on the above to match timings used on other test and the sabdra scores are definitely off....I should be at 7000mb/s at least....

Hoever again back to cyrstalmark that I saw an increase of 54600's to 56400's going to 250 divider from the 200 divider...I still score 55700's por so with the 233 divider so it makes me wonder if in fact it is working and all theose crappy-ass programs we trust sooo much actually dont test the ram speed but similuate based on the speed it is told. And therefore if it is told an incorrect speed cause they dont recognize the new dividers (like A64 tweaker and CPU_Z) then you would have this whacked type of scoring....

A64 tweaker reads my divider at 117 but with an asterick marking reserved ....whatever that means...

Oh and by the way my superpi 32mb score did get better by 40 seconds again possibly proving it is working to real world apps...

DOWN with synthetic apps!!!

 

[Duvie]

updated...

 

[JohnAn2112]

Sounds about the same as me. Memtest and CPU-Z shows the memory at a 133 divider, POST shows DDR500, and SiSoft Sandra gives me a little bit above 6600 mb/s at 250 2.5-3-3-10 1T timings. The SiSoft Sandra score is about the same as when I was running 1:1 at 250 with the same timings.

 

[n7]

I doubt you're gonna see much improvement running those higher dividers.

In the brief review of them Anand did, there was very little improvement.