- Apr 13, 2014
- 8,838
- 1,373
- 126
which artist is better? I love both of them depending on my mood.
here is a nice diamond video
https://youtu.be/Gtd8stZPXNc
here is a nice diamond video
https://youtu.be/Gtd8stZPXNc
maaaaaannnnn I grew up on Neil Diamond. My mom was IN LOVE with him -- that's all she listened to around the house. My entire family has seen him perform dozens and dozens of times. I love him to death.
That being said, Elvis is still king. There's no denying that.
Neil Diamond's music aged MUCH better. Elvis is almost unlistenable to a modern ear, his vocal tricks were basically crappy auto-tune effects before man could even walk on the moon. Neil Diamond has a lot of dated crap in his discography for sure, but in the 21st century Old Man (for example) sounds better than anything Elvis ever did.
With that said, Elvis is a MUCH more important player in the history of music. He was the first solo superstar, a Michael Jackson type decades before Jackson thrilled anyone. His sexualizing of music performances blazed a trail that you see newcomers like Miley pay homage to today. Without Elvis we simply don't have a Madonna, we don't all like big butts and cannot lie.
So I guess the answer all time is Elvis.
I totally agree with everything you said...but its so nice to have choices these days.
It is. The concept that a Spotify subscription gives me access to every song I have ever wanted to hear from a small handheld box almost makes me not depressed that its 2015 and I don't own a freaking hoverboard.
I will also admit I really like Elvis's first song- Thats Alright (Mama). In it you can hear Elvis's true talent without all the Johnny Bravo-esc vocal embellishments he was famous for. Hound Dog ruined him, it was a big hit and they I am sure his manager said "whatever you did to your voice on that song, do it a lot more." Kinda like how Smells Like Teen Spirit's popularity ruined Kurt Cobain.
Roy Orbison :^P
Diamond wins by default cause I can't take Elvis for much more than one song in a row.
I hear ya man. I loved his in the ghetto song.
I'd just as soon not listen to Elvis.
Neil Diamond's music aged MUCH better. Elvis is almost unlistenable to a modern ear, his vocal tricks were basically crappy auto-tune effects before man could even walk on the moon. Neil Diamond has a lot of dated crap in his discography for sure, but in the 21st century Old Man (for example) sounds better than anything Elvis ever did.
With that said, Elvis is a MUCH more important player in the history of music. He was the first solo superstar, a Michael Jackson type decades before Jackson thrilled anyone. His sexualizing of music performances blazed a trail that you see newcomers like Miley pay homage to today. Without Elvis we simply don't have a Madonna, we don't all like big butts and cannot lie.
So I guess the answer all time is Elvis.
I don't see any good reason for you to stop.I'm listening to Annie Lennox with Eurythmics...should I stop now?
I love her solo
Roy Orbison :^P
Diamond wins by default cause I can't take Elvis for much more than one song in a row.
I will also admit I really like Elvis's first song- Thats Alright (Mama). In it you can hear Elvis's true talent without all the Johnny Bravo-esc vocal embellishments he was famous for. Hound Dog ruined him, it was a big hit and they I am sure his manager said "whatever you did to your voice on that song, do it a lot more."
She did sing with Elvis.I'm listening to Annie Lennox with Eurythmics...should I stop now?
I love her solo
Elivis 5-600M records sold.
Neil 150M