Originally posted by: impeachbush
I'm more of a Macintosh guy. For me, floppy drives died almost 10 years ago. I was given a case that didn't have its floppy drive, and I never imagined actually needing one nowadays.
Think about it. By forcing XP users to have a floppy drive, every computer, and more importantly, every laptop needs to have a large, heavy, energy sucking floppy in it. Unbelievable. In a laptop your already squeezing every square inch to make room and keep it lightweight, not to mention cooling, and then stuff a 10 year old obsolete brick in its side just because microsoft won't get with the times?
There's no way I'm going and buying a floppy drive in 2005. I'll send this SATA drive back before doing so. It's not the cost I'm concerned about, its the principle. How hard is it to build in support for at least a cd/dvd drive? Am I missing the point? Is there any logic at all behind still requiring a floppy?
EDIT:
Even worse! I just read up on slipstreaming. Its good info to have, but in my case it still requires wiping out all programs, settings, updates, serials, etc that I already have installed on my old drive. I don't have an entire day or more to spend trying to get my computer back up and running.
Is this really what it comes down to? Buy a floppy vs. wasting hours of my life reinstalling everything just for one driver? And Microsoft has what percentage of marketshare!??