Need the AT effect please!

[iwearnosox]

I've been trying to find a host worthy of my investment and have had some trouble. Would you guys mind reporting back on performance and lag?

Site 1

DNS resolves here so it should be intact aside from pieces I'm not done coding.

Site 2

New candidate, I'm a bit iffy on them but performance appears to be much better. Please ignore broken stuff, it's probably just because I hard coded some stuff that I shouldn't have. A DNS switch will fix this.

You're also welcome to abuse the image hosting, forums and chat at your leisure, until such time as it becomes overwhelming. It's not like I'm doing anything commercial.

 

[waylman]

both were fast. site 1 was slightly faster.

 

[Zim Hosein]

Site 1 loads fastest for me iwearnosox

 

[Crazymofo]

really could not see a dif between the two but if I was forced to make a choice it would be number 2...

 

[iwearnosox]

Originally posted by: Zim Hosein
Site 1 loads fastest for me iwearnosox

Thanks Zim. It's weird but it times out for me, alot. I haven't been able to figure it out.

 

[Kalvin00]

Site 1 seemed slightly faster.

 

[iwearnosox]

Originally posted by: Kalvin00
Site 1 seemed slightly faster.

Just timed out on me. I put some weird caching stuff in there that's supposed to reduce DB hits, I wonder if it's having problems.

Arrgh!

 

[jacob0401]

#1 is faster...

 

[ClueLis]

both are plenty fast for me

 

[Rahminator]

#2 for me

 

[iamme]

#1 is faster.

that fade in is annoying. the fact that i have to log in to see britney is annoying too