- Feb 28, 2003
- 17,948
- 34
- 91
Does anyone have some book suggestions dealing with the Pacific portion of World War 2? I'd rather focus more on Midway and any fighting towards the end of the war.
Originally posted by: Fingolfin269
My grandfather won't talk about it either. He was in the Navy and I know that his ship was sunk at Midway.
Interesting story about him btw. Somehow the topic of WW2 came up a couple of weeks ago. I mentioned the fact that I thought he had been in WW2 but couldn't quite figure out how the math added up. He only seemed old enough to have served in Korea at the earliest. That's when he told me that he joined at the age of 14. The guy wasn't even 18 after serving 3 years when the war ended. So, after that conversation I decided it was time to do some reading on that portion of the war as opposed to the more 'romantic' European portion.
After the war, the Japanese government was afraid that United States and other Allied troops would commit atrocities in a similar manner as their own troops did when invading China in 1937. In order to prevent rapes, on August 18, 1945, the Japanese government opened the "comfort stations" for use by Allied troops.21 According to Japanese documents and testimony from former "comfort women," the women at these stations were forced to serve as sexual slaves to the American soldiers.22 The first "comfort station" opened for the use of United States troops in the Tokyo area on August 27, 1945, with reports that terrified "comfort women" began weeping, clung to posts in the building and refused to move.23
The United States did not simply make use of Japanese initiated "comfort stations" but also requested others be built on their behalf. In September of 1945, the chief of Tokyo's Public Health Section, Yosano Hikaru met with the Surgeon General of the Army to discuss the availability of women for the United States Army. After this meeting, responsibility for the "comfort stations" was divided between Yosano and Colonel C.F. Sams, Chief of the Public Health and Welfare Department. These stations were only closed because of threat of sexually transmitted diseases.
Originally posted by: Kenazo
After the war, the Japanese government was afraid that United States and other Allied troops would commit atrocities in a similar manner as their own troops did when invading China in 1937. In order to prevent rapes, on August 18, 1945, the Japanese government opened the "comfort stations" for use by Allied troops.21 According to Japanese documents and testimony from former "comfort women," the women at these stations were forced to serve as sexual slaves to the American soldiers.22 The first "comfort station" opened for the use of United States troops in the Tokyo area on August 27, 1945, with reports that terrified "comfort women" began weeping, clung to posts in the building and refused to move.23
The United States did not simply make use of Japanese initiated "comfort stations" but also requested others be built on their behalf. In September of 1945, the chief of Tokyo's Public Health Section, Yosano Hikaru met with the Surgeon General of the Army to discuss the availability of women for the United States Army. After this meeting, responsibility for the "comfort stations" was divided between Yosano and Colonel C.F. Sams, Chief of the Public Health and Welfare Department. These stations were only closed because of threat of sexually transmitted diseases.
from here That's awful!
Originally posted by: PingSpike
Originally posted by: Kenazo
from here That's awful!
Indeed. But plenty things more awful than that occured during WWII.
Originally posted by: Kenazo
Originally posted by: PingSpike
Originally posted by: Kenazo
from here That's awful!
Indeed. But plenty things more awful than that occured during WWII.
Yeah, I was doing some reading (brought on by this thread). Sounds like the Pacific was the worst place to be sent. The Japanese were far far worse people to have as enemies than the Germans ever were (unless you happened to be jewish, homosexual or one of the other "targeted" people). Apparently about 3% of the POWS captured by germany died in the camps, compared to 37% in japanese camps. no wonder there was so much hostility towards Japanese people for so long.
Originally posted by: K1052
Originally posted by: Kenazo
Originally posted by: PingSpike
Originally posted by: Kenazo
from here That's awful!
Indeed. But plenty things more awful than that occured during WWII.
Yeah, I was doing some reading (brought on by this thread). Sounds like the Pacific was the worst place to be sent. The Japanese were far far worse people to have as enemies than the Germans ever were (unless you happened to be jewish, homosexual or one of the other "targeted" people). Apparently about 3% of the POWS captured by germany died in the camps, compared to 37% in japanese camps. no wonder there was so much hostility towards Japanese people for so long.
Actually I think the Germans who were captured by the Russians got it worst of all. When the war ended most of the prisoners were used as forced labor for the rest of their lives.
The fighting on the eastern european front was extremely vicious.
Originally posted by: Kenazo
Originally posted by: PingSpike
Originally posted by: Kenazo
from here That's awful!
Indeed. But plenty things more awful than that occured during WWII.
Yeah, I was doing some reading (brought on by this thread). Sounds like the Pacific was the worst place to be sent. The Japanese were far far worse people to have as enemies than the Germans ever were (unless you happened to be jewish, homosexual or one of the other "targeted" people). Apparently about 3% of the POWS captured by germany died in the camps, compared to 37% in japanese camps. no wonder there was so much hostility towards Japanese people for so long.
Originally posted by: PingSpike
Originally posted by: Kenazo
Originally posted by: PingSpike
Originally posted by: Kenazo
from here That's awful!
Indeed. But plenty things more awful than that occured during WWII.
Yeah, I was doing some reading (brought on by this thread). Sounds like the Pacific was the worst place to be sent. The Japanese were far far worse people to have as enemies than the Germans ever were (unless you happened to be jewish, homosexual or one of the other "targeted" people). Apparently about 3% of the POWS captured by germany died in the camps, compared to 37% in japanese camps. no wonder there was so much hostility towards Japanese people for so long.
Definately. My grandfather served in the pacific theater and like others in this thread, he never really spoke of it. He died shortly after I was born so I never knew him, but my mother has told me that he had small bits of shrapnel lodged in his back.
There is a quote in the book I mentioned from a soldier in the pacific, while I'm paraphrasing it was pretty much "I wish we were in Europe fighting the germans, at least they are human."
Japanese soldiers during WWII were trained to be sadistic killing machines. Their propaganda basically said they would be tortured horribly by American troops if they were captured, which is why most chose suicide rather than surrender. The few who did surrender were described in that book as being amazed at the way they were treated. Their vicious fighting determination coupled with their terrible treatment of POWs (the book has a story about this) make me agree with that soldier. I definately would have rather been fighting the Germans in WWII.
Originally posted by: Kenazo
I think i would rather have fought the Italians. Apparently they stopped fighting for 4 course meals.
Originally posted by: PingSpike
Originally posted by: Kenazo
I think i would rather have fought the Italians. Apparently they stopped fighting for 4 course meals.
Well, thats an exaggeration but no, they didn't have nearly as an effective war machines as the Germans.![]()
Originally posted by: Fingolfin269
Do you know if your grandfather received his Purple Heart? I know that mine never got either of the two that he is technically owed for the shrapnel that is supposedly still in his back/wherever the other piece is located.
The funny thing is that I remember asking him about those when I was younger and he didn't seem to care that he didn't have them. I guess I can understand someone not wanting to open up what are obviously very old and very deep mental wounds.
Originally posted by: Kenazo
The really sad thing is that in a few years there will be no more WWII vets left. I remember being at memorial services and seeing 10 or 11 wwI vets there, maybe 80 or 90 WWII vets and a handful of Korean war people, but now, there are what maybe 10 or 11 WWI vets left in all of North America. It won't be long before no one remembers the war.
Originally posted by: ergeorge
Not sure whether it was worse being in the pacific facing the Japanese, or being a german on the eastern front during & after they were over run by the soviets. There's a reason everybody wanted to surrender to the western forces. The russians were awful. My therapist was a young girl in Berlin at the end of the war. Sweetest old lady you'll ever meet. But don't mention russians around her. That and she suffers flashbacks if she hears a radial engine plane fly over.
Originally posted by: Excelsior
Originally posted by: ergeorge
Not sure whether it was worse being in the pacific facing the Japanese, or being a german on the eastern front during & after they were over run by the soviets. There's a reason everybody wanted to surrender to the western forces. The russians were awful. My therapist was a young girl in Berlin at the end of the war. Sweetest old lady you'll ever meet. But don't mention russians around her. That and she suffers flashbacks if she hears a radial engine plane fly over.
You almost can't blame the Russians for being so vicious towards the Germans. They deserved it (not the civilians, I know)