Need Some Web Page Help ( Very Confused )

shadowbot

Junior Member
Mar 13, 2001
13
0
0
Hi,

I currently run site, which receives visits from people who use both IE and Netscape.

The pages that I have within my site have the following format: http://www.mydomain.com/page

Notice that I do not add the .html extension to my pages.

Users who are using Netscape, have told me that when they try access these pages, the only thing that they see is my HTML code.

I have tried these pages with IE, and they work fine.

I dont want to add the .html extension to my pages, because I dont think that it looks as professional. I've noticed that other big sites like http://www.go.com, do not add .html extensions to some of their pages (and Im sure that these pages work fine with Netscape browsers).

So is there something that I should be adding to my pages, which allow Netscape browsers to properly view pages without the .html extension?

Should I add:

<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC &quot;-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 Transitional//EN&quot;>

--OR--

<META http-equiv=Content-Type content=&quot;text/html; charset=windows-1252&quot;>


I know that there are MANY different variations of the tags above. Which variation would be the correct one to use on my pages, (if this is what I need to add)?????

Oh yeah, and I have added the <HTML></HTML> tags at the beginning and end of my code. :)

Any help would be greatly appreciated,
-Karl :confused:
 

KB

Diamond Member
Nov 8, 1999
5,406
389
126
Netscape will treat a page without the .html or .htm extension as a text file or download file. That is why is displays the code. You need the html extension on your pages so there is no reason not to use it.
 

littleprince

Golden Member
Jan 4, 2001
1,339
1
81
i was just wondering what the heck are you talking about
so i visted go.com
the reason they don't have .html at the end of that page is, coz its a directory
so by default it loads index.htm, or html
i guess you could do the same thing
new directory for every page, and every page will be named index.html
but that sounds stupid to me...

i don't know why you would think its less professional to add an .html extension though, to me, if anything it at least shows you know how to name something properly.
i think cheesy javascripts, and animated gifs would make it unprofessional