I'm going to replace my Dell 2001FP with a new widescreen monitor soon, but I'm very unsure about what kind of monitor I should spend my money on.
Just the other day I got a Benq G2400WD, and decided pretty quickly the image quality sucks compared to the 2001FP. It turns out that the 2001FP has an S-IPS panel (which i didn't find out about until recently, because I didn't really know anything about different panels), and the G2400WD has a TN panel. In my eyes everything about this TN panel was just so much worse that I returned it a couple of days after I got it.
So what would I need to feel that I have a monitor that's as good or better than the 2001FP? Is the only option to look for another S-IPS panel? What about all the different MVA/PVA variants? Would I notice a big difference between those and my 2001FP too?
I've been reading up on the different panels and reading reviews and forums and so on, but it all seems to be very subjective. Some people say that S-IPS panels aren't good for gaming, but I never had any problems with that.
My requirements are a 24"-27" (preferable 26" or 27") monitor with a native 1920x1200 resolution. I'll be using it for general stuff and some movie-watching and gaming, so I need something that's good for everything. The price isn't all that important. The high-end monitors I've looked at with IPS panels have something called "wide gamut" which people don't like because it makes the colors oversaturated. I'm not sure how big an issue this is for regular computer usage. Any input on this? I've been looking into monitors like the NEC LCD2690WUXi, but I'm too worried about this gamut issue to make a decision.
All suggestions are welcome.
Just the other day I got a Benq G2400WD, and decided pretty quickly the image quality sucks compared to the 2001FP. It turns out that the 2001FP has an S-IPS panel (which i didn't find out about until recently, because I didn't really know anything about different panels), and the G2400WD has a TN panel. In my eyes everything about this TN panel was just so much worse that I returned it a couple of days after I got it.
So what would I need to feel that I have a monitor that's as good or better than the 2001FP? Is the only option to look for another S-IPS panel? What about all the different MVA/PVA variants? Would I notice a big difference between those and my 2001FP too?
I've been reading up on the different panels and reading reviews and forums and so on, but it all seems to be very subjective. Some people say that S-IPS panels aren't good for gaming, but I never had any problems with that.
My requirements are a 24"-27" (preferable 26" or 27") monitor with a native 1920x1200 resolution. I'll be using it for general stuff and some movie-watching and gaming, so I need something that's good for everything. The price isn't all that important. The high-end monitors I've looked at with IPS panels have something called "wide gamut" which people don't like because it makes the colors oversaturated. I'm not sure how big an issue this is for regular computer usage. Any input on this? I've been looking into monitors like the NEC LCD2690WUXi, but I'm too worried about this gamut issue to make a decision.
All suggestions are welcome.