I think most members here including the product reviewers are AMD devotees as it shows here in this forum and the way the reviews are conducted. The reviews of Intel's CPU may superficially look as though fair and square. But by dissecting the way it is written it gives the reader a tendency to lien toward AMD. This may explain why most viewers here downgrade Intel and hyped up on AMD.
This site is useless to me since I find it bias, and viewers become belligerent toward another. as soon as positive feedbacks on Intel is mentioned.
There are plenty other websites that are fair and square and best for making the right decision on what to buy-unlike here.
I think the other problem here is- AMD has sucked almost all of you to buy their product and attract you because of winxp64. Now that you are stocked with your outdated product and spent tons of money on DDR400 and all the gauges and find AMD is way off chart on dual, price wise, and Intel is what you should invest on but cant, you are upset and all you can do is promote your immature advice to a new buyer. EVERYONE knows that Intel is a better product when it comes down to quality. Specially when new RAM DDR2 SLI, and HT, Dual CPU, Motherboards, etc are now the latest technology. How many of you have 15 years old Intel CPU and motherboards and still works and how many had to replace their motherboards and burned out AMD CPU?s?
Yahh overclocking is good but why do you have to overclock in first place if you already have a quality and fast CPU? AMD is fooling everyone by unlocking their CPU?s for overclocking. But why? Because they have to compete w/ Intel?s 3.8 GHZ stock CPU. Common guys be real don?t fool yourself.
You know you cant buy AMD dual because it is way too expensive and cant perform as good as Intel?s lowest speed 820D dual that only costs $225.
By the time you put an AMD super clocked super priced AMD dual, you know you could have done this w/ Intel for ½ as much and faster CPU; and keep it for years not worrying everyday for burning up your machine because you had to overclock it to say to others ? my AMD runs @ 2.6" so you don?t look as bad when you are talking to your friend who made a wise decision and bought Intel 3.6 GHZ. Intel?s name is built on quality. AMD?s reputation is based on cheap product and inferior quality. That is why in first place you invested in AMD. But now you feel betrayed because the latest technology that is out in the market is Intel and is less expensive, and you have no choice but jump ship.
Is this why you cant be objective when someone asks your opinion on brand new setup?
This site is useless to me since I find it bias, and viewers become belligerent toward another. as soon as positive feedbacks on Intel is mentioned.
There are plenty other websites that are fair and square and best for making the right decision on what to buy-unlike here.
I think the other problem here is- AMD has sucked almost all of you to buy their product and attract you because of winxp64. Now that you are stocked with your outdated product and spent tons of money on DDR400 and all the gauges and find AMD is way off chart on dual, price wise, and Intel is what you should invest on but cant, you are upset and all you can do is promote your immature advice to a new buyer. EVERYONE knows that Intel is a better product when it comes down to quality. Specially when new RAM DDR2 SLI, and HT, Dual CPU, Motherboards, etc are now the latest technology. How many of you have 15 years old Intel CPU and motherboards and still works and how many had to replace their motherboards and burned out AMD CPU?s?
Yahh overclocking is good but why do you have to overclock in first place if you already have a quality and fast CPU? AMD is fooling everyone by unlocking their CPU?s for overclocking. But why? Because they have to compete w/ Intel?s 3.8 GHZ stock CPU. Common guys be real don?t fool yourself.
You know you cant buy AMD dual because it is way too expensive and cant perform as good as Intel?s lowest speed 820D dual that only costs $225.
By the time you put an AMD super clocked super priced AMD dual, you know you could have done this w/ Intel for ½ as much and faster CPU; and keep it for years not worrying everyday for burning up your machine because you had to overclock it to say to others ? my AMD runs @ 2.6" so you don?t look as bad when you are talking to your friend who made a wise decision and bought Intel 3.6 GHZ. Intel?s name is built on quality. AMD?s reputation is based on cheap product and inferior quality. That is why in first place you invested in AMD. But now you feel betrayed because the latest technology that is out in the market is Intel and is less expensive, and you have no choice but jump ship.
Is this why you cant be objective when someone asks your opinion on brand new setup?
Facebook
Twitter