I certainly wouldnt spend 150 bucks on a card for that res. even a $60 4670 would be more than plenty for 1024x768. that would be a massive upgrade over that 2400 for sure.Screen res: 1024x768
games i play: Sims3, bully, warcraft 3, and old GTA games
budget: less than $150
The 2600pro and HD 4670 have similar power consumption (within a few watts) so you should be as fine as you were.
Hats off to everyone who were able to resist the urge to recommend a new computer based on his specs
And Meaker10, nice video card. I had those in every one of my rigs back in the days.
I would go for an HD4650 which is an underclocked HD4670 but for only a $10 difference, that might be nil.
*resist temptation for other computer component recommendations*
Hats off to everyone who were able to resist the urge to recommend a new computer based on his specs
And Meaker10, nice video card. I had those in every one of my rigs back in the days.
I would go for an HD4650 which is an underclocked HD4670 but for only a $10 difference, that might be nil.
*resist temptation for other computer component recommendations*
A 4850 uses 110W at idle a 4670 maxes at 75W due to the pcie standard.
you are not even remotely close. the 4670 doesnt use external power so common sense would tell you that it doesnt use near 75 watts even under load. a 2600 uses about the same amount of power as a 4670. http://xbitlabs.com/articles/video/display/powercolor-pcshd4670-512mb_5.html#sect0I'm not sure what you mean by 'similar power consumption'. After searching the net for power consumption for the 2600Pro and HD4670. I found something that says the 2600Pro uses only 15.6watt at idle. While the HD4670 was using 132watt at idle.
If that power consumption is true that means. The HD4670 uses 116.4 more watts then a 2600Pro.