- Sep 24, 2007
- 7,633
- 2,894
- 136
I'm in need of ATOT's vast knowledge to help me unscrew the giant dildo Quicken Loans shoved up my butt.
I have an FHA loan on my house which I am not only current on, but I am ahead in payments on. My rate is currently 5.75% and I'd like to refinance because rates are ~4%. The FHA has their streamline refinance program that requires no appraisal, no employment verification, no income verification, and no credit check.
I submitted an FHA streamline refinance application through Quicken Loans. As part of their underwriting they pulled a credit report and income verification. My wife worked at a commission-based job (~50% of her income was commission) that she had held for 2+ years. Quicken arbitrarily and capriciously discounted her commission income to zero and then said our debt:income was too high and denied the loan. They then reported the denial to FHA for debt:income ratio. This is in spite of the fact that debt:income was Quicken's own requirement and not an FHA requirement.
I sent in an application to a new lender who did not check credit, income, or employment. When they submitted the loan to FHA for final approval they got a notice back that Quicken had already denied based on debt:income so the new lender had to deny as well. I contacted Quicken and they said that FHA guidelines require they report the declination even though it is not an FHA standard and that they cannot remove it from the record.
So I'm stuck where I can't find a lender that can process an FHA streamline for me because my debt:income was too high even though that's not an FHA factor. This is all because Quicken used it as their own internal requirement.
Does anyone know a lender that will work with me? Is what I'm being told by Quicken and the other lender true? Since Quicken's declination of an FHA streamline was not based on FHA standards and now I'm stuck either with no refi and/or with a higher rate do I have legal recourse against them for the lost benefit of the refi?
This whole thing is asinine because the FHA guarantees the loan 100% so there is no risk to the lender and forcing us to stay in the original loan makes it more risky, not less.
I have an FHA loan on my house which I am not only current on, but I am ahead in payments on. My rate is currently 5.75% and I'd like to refinance because rates are ~4%. The FHA has their streamline refinance program that requires no appraisal, no employment verification, no income verification, and no credit check.
I submitted an FHA streamline refinance application through Quicken Loans. As part of their underwriting they pulled a credit report and income verification. My wife worked at a commission-based job (~50% of her income was commission) that she had held for 2+ years. Quicken arbitrarily and capriciously discounted her commission income to zero and then said our debt:income was too high and denied the loan. They then reported the denial to FHA for debt:income ratio. This is in spite of the fact that debt:income was Quicken's own requirement and not an FHA requirement.
I sent in an application to a new lender who did not check credit, income, or employment. When they submitted the loan to FHA for final approval they got a notice back that Quicken had already denied based on debt:income so the new lender had to deny as well. I contacted Quicken and they said that FHA guidelines require they report the declination even though it is not an FHA standard and that they cannot remove it from the record.
So I'm stuck where I can't find a lender that can process an FHA streamline for me because my debt:income was too high even though that's not an FHA factor. This is all because Quicken used it as their own internal requirement.
Does anyone know a lender that will work with me? Is what I'm being told by Quicken and the other lender true? Since Quicken's declination of an FHA streamline was not based on FHA standards and now I'm stuck either with no refi and/or with a higher rate do I have legal recourse against them for the lost benefit of the refi?
This whole thing is asinine because the FHA guarantees the loan 100% so there is no risk to the lender and forcing us to stay in the original loan makes it more risky, not less.