Need CHEAP digital camera recommendations

dullard

Elite Member
May 21, 2001
26,066
4,712
126
Searched for what I thought would be a common topic and didn't find anything at all recent.

I need an inexpensive digital camera. Hopefully under $200. Nothing special is needed. I'd be fine with 2 MP. The pictures won't be printed, just reduced in resolution to small files on a computer.

I would perfer a small camera that I could shove into a pocket. I'd also perfer one that could use rechargable or standard batteries.

I know nothing of cameras, but I just want to make certain I avoid a piece of crap that takes horrible quality pictures or that will fall apart shortly after buying it.
 

dug777

Lifer
Oct 13, 2004
24,778
4
0
my gf's pretty ancient Sony Cybershot 3.2MP has been/is still excellent, they must be cheap now ;)
 
Dec 4, 2002
18,211
1
0
Originally posted by: dug777
my gf's pretty ancient Sony Cybershot 3.3MP has been/is still excellent, they must be cheap now ;)

The only available sony @ a B&M location would be a S40 or S60...I would still go with the Canon A510.

edit: at least in his price range
 

dug777

Lifer
Oct 13, 2004
24,778
4
0
Originally posted by: CheapArse
Originally posted by: dug777
my gf's pretty ancient Sony Cybershot 3.3MP has been/is still excellent, they must be cheap now ;)

The only available sony @ a B&M location would be a S40 or S60...I would still go with the Canon A510.

edit: at least in his price range

:thumbsup:
 

godmare

Diamond Member
Sep 25, 2002
5,121
0
0
Originally posted by: CheapArse
Originally posted by: dug777
my gf's pretty ancient Sony Cybershot 3.3MP has been/is still excellent, they must be cheap now ;)

The only available sony @ a B&M location would be a S40 or S60...I would still go with the Canon A510.

edit: at least in his price range

I'd have to agree that canon is a better choice over sony at this price point.
 

dullard

Elite Member
May 21, 2001
26,066
4,712
126
Thanks for the Cannon recommendation.

How would that compare to the Fuji A345? On paper, the Fuji specs seem to all beat the Cannon specs.
 
Dec 4, 2002
18,211
1
0
Originally posted by: dullard
Thanks for the Cannon recommendation.

How would that compare to the Fuji A345? On paper, the Fuji specs seem to all beat the Cannon specs.

Only b/c you're looking at the MP probably. Although the Fuji has 1 more MP, the Canon's Digic II processor is the best in its class. The canon also takes SD memory cards which are CHEAP in comparison to Fujis expensive XD cards. All that aside, Canons are simply made better than Fujis.

EDIT: Also, if you're printing @ 4" x6", you'll never see that extra MP.
 

godmare

Diamond Member
Sep 25, 2002
5,121
0
0
The thing that's nice about canons, even the inexpensive ones, is the build quality- it actually feels like you've got something in your hands. The cheapy Sony's feel like a disposable camera. I'm not sure about Fuji, I haven't looked at them a lot, so hopefully someone else can chime in.
 
Dec 4, 2002
18,211
1
0
I briefly checked out the B&M deals for you on the a510. OD has it on clearance for $170, but you may not be able to find it.

If they are out, my advice would be to go to www.msn.com. Under the "shopping" section, there is a link that says "exclusive savings at circuit city". Click that and you will be told that if you add $200 to your cart, they will take off $20 instantly. Add the a510 to your cart, then add Sandsik 256mb SD memory card(you'll need it). The total should be $215. As you check out the $20 will appear and bring the total down to $195. There is a $10 mail in rebate on the sandisk card. $185 will be your final total. You need it today, so choose the in-store pick up option when you're checking out and go pick it up.

http://www.dpreview.com/reviews/canona510/
 

dullard

Elite Member
May 21, 2001
26,066
4,712
126
Thanks CheapArse. Looks like Circuit City doesn't have it in stock anywhere near me. :(
 
Dec 4, 2002
18,211
1
0
Originally posted by: dullard
Thanks CheapArse. Looks like Circuit City doesn't have it in stock anywhere near me. :(

Ouch. Check your local ODs...looks like BB doesn't even carry it and CompUSA is $200 with no memory card.
 
Dec 4, 2002
18,211
1
0
You might consider the same thing @ CC with the Nikon 4600, but I personally would get a canon if it was my money. You could check out the A520...bit more than you wanted to spend though.
 
Dec 4, 2002
18,211
1
0
Actually, the A520 comes up at $225, with the $20 off link from MSN...$205 isn't that bad considering you need it today. I would get that if you can't get ahold of the A510.
 

dullard

Elite Member
May 21, 2001
26,066
4,712
126
Originally posted by: CheapArse
Actually, the A520 comes up at $225, with the $20 off link from MSN...$205 isn't that bad considering you need it today. I would get that if you can't get ahold of the A510.
Do you have a direct link to that MSN $20 off? I just can't find it from your description above. I get to shopping.msn.com and I see:

Shop by Category on the left
Fall Fashion Styles in the middle
Featured Stores on the right.

Circuit City isn't mentioned anywhere.
 

hevnsnt

Lifer
Mar 18, 2000
10,868
1
0
Check fatwallet, I think you can get an SD400 for ~$200 right now !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
 

kevinthenerd

Platinum Member
Jun 27, 2002
2,908
0
76
Originally posted by: dullard
Searched for what I thought would be a common topic and didn't find anything at all recent.

I need an inexpensive digital camera. Hopefully under $200. Nothing special is needed. I'd be fine with 2 MP. The pictures won't be printed, just reduced in resolution to small files on a computer.

I would perfer a small camera that I could shove into a pocket. I'd also perfer one that could use rechargable or standard batteries.

I know nothing of cameras, but I just want to make certain I avoid a piece of crap that takes horrible quality pictures or that will fall apart shortly after buying it.

Does it need to zoom? if not, go with the Kodak C300 or CX7300. 3.2MP, built like a tank, takes AA batteries. (I use rechargable NiMH.) My only beef is the small aperture, which makes it suck in the dark unless you hold it very still.
 

captains

Diamond Member
Mar 27, 2003
4,065
1
0
if u need it today i would just go and get some of those digital disposable cameras. the seem to take good pics
 

dullard

Elite Member
May 21, 2001
26,066
4,712
126
Originally posted by: kevinthenerd
Does it need to zoom? if not, go with the Kodak C300 or CX7300. 3.2MP, built like a tank, takes AA batteries. (I use rechargable NiMH.) My only beef is the small aperture, which makes it suck in the dark unless you hold it very still.
Zoom is certainly a nice feature. I'll look at those Kodaks, but I probably would want a zoom.

That fatwallet thread made my head spin. Bay area only deal (for last Saturday only) with price matching a rebate and using an Ad against store policy so your mileage may vary.

 

RossMAN

Grand Nagus
Feb 24, 2000
79,028
436
136
Originally posted by: dullard
Thanks for the Cannon recommendation.

How would that compare to the Fuji A345? On paper, the Fuji specs seem to all beat the Cannon specs.

How about a side-by-side comparison of the A510 vs A345 :)

For the reasons that CheapArse listed, I'd buy the Canon PowerShot A510 over the Fuji.
 

FoBoT

No Lifer
Apr 30, 2001
63,084
15
81
fobot.com
uh, anyway
i stopped in costco for lunch

they had one HP camera for $199, all the others were more
so maybe that isn't the best place for a lower end camera