NC Restaurant Banned Guns, Got Robbed At Gunpoint

Page 3 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.

WelshBloke

Lifer
Jan 12, 2005
31,471
9,368
136
Why do you assume the owner would be there?

Of all the assumptions in the thread you want to bring that one up? :)

Why do you assume he isn't? Why do you assume that he doesn't leave a shotgun under the counter for whoevers in charge?

...And the point is the criminal cant either. So the whole point of criminals relying on the place being unarmed is nul.


Why do you assume it doesn't make any difference to criminals if they are faced with one gun wielding responder or many? In my book the fewer barrels pointed at me, the better.

I presume you are a gun owner?

You're completely comfortable with you having guns on your property.
What if you were having a party? Would you be comfortable with all your friends turning up to your house with guns as well?
What about if their friends turn up? People you don't know coming onto your property with guns? OK with that?

Even if you are can you not see why some property owners might not be?
 

MagickMan

Diamond Member
Aug 11, 2008
7,460
3
76
No, the point is that it's 1000 times more likely that business will be lost because potential clients will be turned of by gun-toting idiots than because a robber targets the restaurant.

Maybe in NYC or SF, not in NC.
 

mrjminer

Platinum Member
Dec 2, 2005
2,739
16
76
Of all the assumptions in the thread you want to bring that one up? :)

Why do you assume he isn't? Why do you assume that he doesn't leave a shotgun under the counter for whoevers in charge?

...And the point is the criminal cant either. So the whole point of criminals relying on the place being unarmed is nul.




I presume you are a gun owner?

You're completely comfortable with you having guns on your property.
What if you were having a party? Would you be comfortable with all your friends turning up to your house with guns as well?
What about if their friends turn up? People you don't know coming onto your property with guns? OK with that?

Even if you are can you not see why some property owners might not be?

I don't own a gun, but I don't see it as a problem so long as they aren't pulling their guns out to be cool or something. Responsible gun owners aren't anything to be afraid of. The thing to be afraid of, per usual, are crazy people and criminals.

On an initial glance, I personally get more alert when someone is walking around with some other weapon, like a bat or a knife, because I know that the people carrying guns in public at least had to go through some kind of checkpoints to obtain their weapon. Unless they are criminals carrying openly, but I tend to not go into areas with a large amount of criminals carrying guns around in the open for all to see.

You live in the UK, though. IIRC guns are largely prohibited or banned by citizens, so your concern is understandable. In the US, you wouldn't even know if someone was carrying a firearm most of the time since most people don't advertise it unless they are making some kind of political statement, or just a hunter.

Some people and businesses have a problem with those carrying guns, and it is their choice whether or not to allow them in their homes/establishments. By restricting patrons from having guns, it does limit the potential high threat targets a criminal has to manage (ie: just the guy behind the counter instead of the guy behind the counter and all the people in the establishment). Again, not that criminals are the smartest bunch and pick up on things like this, but I certainly feel safer going into a place that doesn't inherently distrust their customers or make political statements at the expense of becoming a potentially higher value target to a criminal.
 

kage69

Lifer
Jul 17, 2003
28,803
40,359
136
Of all the assumptions in the thread you want to bring that one up? :)

I'm surprised you're acting like I said that out of the blue, when I specifically responded to your mention of the owner's presence, an assumption itself. It's actually pretty rare for a restaurant owner to man the place all the time, have you never worked in one before?

Why do you assume he isn't? Why do you assume that he doesn't leave a shotgun under the counter for whoevers in charge?

Personal experience with restaurants and firearms spanning decades, since you asked. Owners often do keep a firearm of some variety in their place of business, but only the naive and/or stupid ones look at it like it's some kind of communal resource where everyone from the manager to the dishwashers is made aware of it and encouraged to grab it if a robbery commences. You're from the UK, so I can't blame you for not realizing a few things that many Americans learn or know instinctively about guns. If you keep one for the express purpose of saving lives, making others aware of it's presence is a great way to compromise that purpose. Suppose a disgruntled employee comes in after hours, intoxicated helps himself to it with the aim of settling some scores. Suppose the hippy peacenik waiting tables takes it upon herself to unload it because she's absolutely sure it will never be needed and doesn't want it going off accidentally. Suppose the owner isn't comfortable with the idea of a headstrong young waiter or cashier picking it up and trying to be the hero, making themselves a target in the process? In the states we don't expect employees to die for their job, but there is nothing wrong with a business owner protecting their business, employees and customers if they are put in the that position. Do keep in mind that a 9mm concealed on your hip, or a .38 strapped to your ankle, represents A LOT more defensive ability than a shotgun hidden away behind goods on a shelf, in addition to being easier and quicker to draw and fire. Seconds count when the guys in ski masks storm through a door, and it's not like the notion of a shotgun behind the counter is a new idea either. In the likely event there isn't time to reach it, I seriously doubt jumpy thugs are going to allow anyone to get upright and do anything beyond kiss the ground. Sounds like a good way to get shot or pistol whipped to me, either way you lose.


...And the point is the criminal cant either. So the whole point of criminals relying on the place being unarmed is nul.

Criminals aren't in the habit of making sound choices, and I doubt any of them consider their chosen path devoid of risk to their wellbeing - which is why they look for things that indicate an easy job. Criminals shooting people and getting shot themselves is something of mainstay in American history, both past and present. Ours is a gun culture, and I can pretty much guarantee you that the average American criminal in a gun loving state has a completely different set of concerns than your average pikey nicking tellies from a shop in Cardiff.


I presume you are a gun owner?

Correct.

You're completely comfortable with you having guns on your property. What if you were having a party? Would you be comfortable with all your friends turning up to your house with guns as well?
What about if their friends turn up? People you don't know coming onto your property with guns? OK with that?

Even if you are can you not see why some property owners might not be?


Sorry old boy, but that is all irrelevant. Not only is my home not a place of business open to the public, I have never once said or implied that I feel business owners shouldn't have the right to make the 'house rules' as they see fit (there are exceptions of course- customers can choose not to strap on the iron, but they can't choose their ethnicity, for example). My friends know that their safety is guaranteed on my private property, and if any of them were in the habit of bringing complete strangers over without my invitation they wouldn't be my friends in the first place, regardless of guns being involved. People that I don't know simply don't come onto my property, for a variety of reasons I won't derail into. Can you see why comparing a place of business to the place where my wife and kids live and sleep is more than a little silly? The rights of property owners is not the issue here, but if it was you wouldn't be hearing me argue against them. I think some of you are confusing my views on the practicality of that owner putting up the sign with the owner's right to put up the sign.

Don't worry though, you're still my favorite taffy. ;)
 
Last edited:

MrPickins

Diamond Member
May 24, 2003
9,088
723
126
Yes, criminals do research, these are clearly very intelligent people who staked out the place, knew exactly what place to rob and all that, all for what? $50?

The overwhelming majority of criminals are not all that bright, they don't really care, they drive around high as hell and rob a place, any place.

This, and this:

The 'no guns' signs are not intended to deter criminals, they are intended to make the store a place without the casual possession of firearms that might make clients or employees unhappy or uncomfortable.

Additionally, the idea that criminals go around town searching for stores with 'no guns please' signs on them to rob is pretty ridiculous if you look into how much planning goes into the average robbery. (basically none)

What on earth made people think that the no guns signs were intended to deter crime?

Humor/irony not found.
 

CitizenKain

Diamond Member
Jul 6, 2000
4,480
14
76
the idiot left is once again missing the point:

The idiots store owners that put up the sign are just your average dimwit lefty. They think that if they have a sign it will keep them safe.

Because that's how the left thinks, the left thinks that criminals will obey signs and laws. So they pass more and more gun laws all in the hopes of reducing gun violence, failing every time because criminals don't give a fuck about the law.

I should find it funny that rightwingers believe something so stupid.
 
Sep 7, 2009
12,960
3
0
Only one of your previous links occurred during the normal operating hours, the rest were when the stores were unoccupied. Unless the robbers are armed to the teeth (like the last link you posted) they normally don't attempt to rob a gun store due to the fact most workers and shoppers could be carrying concealed.


Exactly.


And CCW owners stop robberies ALL the time.

I googled gun owner stops waffle house robbery....



"Unfortunately for the armed crook, two enjoying a hearty breakfast possessed concealed carry permits and thwarted the theft." (good video):

http://www.offthegridnews.com/2013/...-stopped-by-men-with-concealed-carry-permits/


"The scout saw that two of the customers were wearing holstered 1911 Springfield Mil-Spec .45 pistols, and he immediately turned and left the store.":

http://www.examiner.com/article/open-carry-deters-armed-robbery-kennesaw


And this my favorite. Of course the thug family is trying to claim he didn't hafta die. "A customer stood his ground and sent Dante off to an inferno":

http://www.frontpagemag.com/2014/dg...obber-still-outraged-he-was-shot-by-customer/
 
Sep 7, 2009
12,960
3
0
Well that's the real tragedy, there was no one here to turn the robbery into a shootout.


That was decided by the thug robbers who stormed the restaurant armed.

Funny how you don't see these sort of thug tactics go down in waffle houses. Wonder why...?

WaffleHouselocationsbystate.png
 

desy

Diamond Member
Jan 13, 2000
5,442
211
106
What a wonderful world where everybody needs to be armed to save themselves while sitting at a lunch counter somewhere :(
 
Sep 7, 2009
12,960
3
0
What a wonderful world where everybody needs to be armed to save themselves while sitting at a lunch counter somewhere :(


I know that in modern progressive utopia there are no bad guys, but that is not the world we live in.

As long as bad people exist, you should be able to protect yourselves from them.

As it currently stands, all legal efforts to ban guns only affect the good people of America.


Anywhere that has banned guns is ripe fruit waiting to be picked by a criminal.
 

fskimospy

Elite Member
Mar 10, 2006
85,686
50,967
136
I know that in modern progressive utopia there are no bad guys, but that is not the world we live in.

As long as bad people exist, you should be able to protect yourselves from them.

As it currently stands, all legal efforts to ban guns only affect the good people of America.


Anywhere that has banned guns is ripe fruit waiting to be picked by a criminal.

You would think that all those disarmed ripe fruit countries the world over would be beset by gun toting criminals robbing them blind. I'm sure the reason this isn't so is because the criminals just haven't realized they don't have guns yet.

The fantasyland you live in is pretty hilarious sometimes. I wonder what you would do if you stepped outside and encountered the real world.
 

Thebobo

Lifer
Jun 19, 2006
18,574
7,671
136
I know that in modern progressive utopia there are no bad guys, but that is not the world we live in.

As long as bad people exist, you should be able to protect yourselves from them.

As it currently stands, all legal efforts to ban guns only affect the good people of America.

Anywhere that has banned guns is ripe fruit waiting to be picked by a criminal.

Funny that in other developed countries and in a lot of the USA that is just not true. How do you explain that? I can, and you will probably be insulted so I wont.
 

spidey07

No Lifer
Aug 4, 2000
65,469
5
76
Funny that in other developed countries and in a lot of the USA that is just not true. How do you explain that? I can, and you will probably be insulted so I wont.

Bullshit. Liar. Bullshit.

These kinds of lies cannot be tolerated. Move to your utopia. Or I will send you there with my liberty.
 
Last edited:

highland145

Lifer
Oct 12, 2009
43,970
6,317
136
Funny that in other developed countries and in a lot of the USA that is just not true. How do you explain that? I can, and you will probably be insulted so I wont.
Home invasion rates in Australia skyrocketed after their ban.

But whatever. Ban what you like. I don't have any guns.
 

highland145

Lifer
Oct 12, 2009
43,970
6,317
136
I think these guys were tied into your 1st story.

Local to me.

http://chronicle.augusta.com/news/c...er-kills-suspected-burglar-injures-two-others
Stephen Bayazes Jr., 57, told officers that he and his wife were asleep in an apartment at the back of the business, Guns & Ammo Gunsmith, 522 Edgefield Road, shortly before 4 a.m. when he awoke after hearing a loud crash and the activation of a silent alarm.
Bayazes grabbed an AR-15 semiautomatic rifle and found three men loading guns into a van that had crashed through the side wall of the store.
After hearing the men yell to kill him, Bayazes shot one 30-round magazine of .223-caliber bullets before retreating to his bedroom to reload, he later told officers.
1 dead, 2 injured and captured. 30 rounds of .223, shame.
 

spidey07

No Lifer
Aug 4, 2000
65,469
5
76
*facepalm*


Keep validating those stereotypes spidey, heckuva job. We're gonna see you in the news someday, aren't we?

Doubtful. Any self defense shooting or when a home owner shoots an intruder rarely makes it in the news even though it happens every single day.

The time for being nice to those who would infringe upon our rights are over. It's time to get in their face and call them out. Shame them and fight them. Let them know there are very serious consequences if they attempt to deprive Americans of their natural rights.

No compromise.
 
Last edited:

OCGuy

Lifer
Jul 12, 2000
27,224
36
91
Funny that in other developed countries and in a lot of the USA that is just not true. How do you explain that? I can, and you will probably be insulted so I wont.

Explain what? Guns aren't being banned in the USA. In fact quite the opposite, laws just keep getting less restrictive outside of CA and CT.

The SCOTUS affirmed the right to own a gun in the home in Heller. Soon they will have to step in and decide if that extends outside the home as well, since the federal circuit courts are inconsistent. The only rulings against it completely ignore Heller, and SCOTUS generally doesn't appreciate that. Even the 9th Circuit ruled in favor of CCW in February. Hawaii is taking another look at its firearms laws to try to get into compliance.
 
Last edited:

brycejones

Lifer
Oct 18, 2005
27,693
26,836
136
*facepalm*


Keep validating those stereotypes spidey, heckuva job. We're gonna see you in the news someday, aren't we?

Just don't tell him to fuck off and die to his face and you might be OK........

Just to be safe, don't look at him funny either
 

jhbball

Platinum Member
Mar 20, 2002
2,917
23
81
Doubtful. Any self defense shooting or when a home owner shoots an intruder rarely makes it in the news even though it happens every single day.

The time for being nice to those who would infringe upon our rights are over. It's time to get in their face and call them out. Shame them and fight them. Let them know there are very serious consequences if they attempt to deprive Americans of their natural rights.

No compromise.

How ugly is your wife? Be honest.

Challenge Spidey all you wish, but attacking his wife is right over the line.

Perknose
Forum Director
 
Last edited by a moderator: