NBA PLAYOFFS: Kings at Wolves Game 7 Thread

Chiboy

Diamond Member
Jun 4, 2002
3,814
6
81
I want the Kings to win, I hope the Kings win. If you have anything to say about the game post it here.

BTW Lager, You suck! & so do the Wolves.
 

monk3y

Lifer
Jun 12, 2001
12,699
0
76
Go Wolves... Just because I don't think the Kings have ANY chance of beating the Lakers.
 

CaseTragedy

Platinum Member
Oct 24, 2000
2,690
0
0
The only reason I'm rooting for the Kings is because it'll make it easier on the Lakers. :evil:
 

Ranger X

Lifer
Mar 18, 2000
11,218
1
0
I'm not sure who the Lakers match up better with because Alien-boy is hobbling for Minnesota.
 

Reliant

Diamond Member
Mar 29, 2001
3,843
0
76
Originally posted by: CaseTragedy
The only reason I'm rooting for the Kings is because it'll make it easier on the Lakers. :evil:

The toughest match for the Lakers is the Kings, not the other way around.
 

CaseTragedy

Platinum Member
Oct 24, 2000
2,690
0
0
Originally posted by: Reliant
Originally posted by: CaseTragedy
The only reason I'm rooting for the Kings is because it'll make it easier on the Lakers. :evil:

The toughest match for the Lakers is the Kings, not the other way around.
Nah--I think it be easier taking the Kings than the Wolves. We get owned on Wolves court--and they'd have homecourt advantage.
 

Reliant

Diamond Member
Mar 29, 2001
3,843
0
76
Originally posted by: CaseTragedy
Originally posted by: Reliant
Originally posted by: CaseTragedy
The only reason I'm rooting for the Kings is because it'll make it easier on the Lakers. :evil:

The toughest match for the Lakers is the Kings, not the other way around.
Nah--I think it be easier taking the Kings than the Wolves. We get owned on Wolves court--and they'd have homecourt advantage.

Did you forget the Kings also took the season series 3-1? No one remembers that at all. The Kings even beat the Lakers at the end of the season when the Lakers were making that 14-3 streak. Bibby always works the Lakers, Miller and Vlade defend Shaq better than anyone can, Malone's an easier matchup for Webber, etc. I could go on. The Wolves are new to all this, Garnett has been absent during parts of this series, Cassell is hurt, Wally isn't healthy, Hassell and Hoiberg can't be expected to keep up their play. The only reason the Lakers would want to see the Kings is because they'd have homecourt, not because of the matchups.
 

CubicZirconia

Diamond Member
Nov 24, 2001
5,193
0
71
Originally posted by: Reliant
Originally posted by: CaseTragedy
Originally posted by: Reliant
Originally posted by: CaseTragedy
The only reason I'm rooting for the Kings is because it'll make it easier on the Lakers. :evil:

The toughest match for the Lakers is the Kings, not the other way around.
Nah--I think it be easier taking the Kings than the Wolves. We get owned on Wolves court--and they'd have homecourt advantage.

Did you forget the Kings also took the season series 3-1? No one remembers that at all. The Kings even beat the Lakers at the end of the season when the Lakers were making that 14-3 streak. Bibby always works the Lakers, Miller and Vlade defend Shaq better than anyone can, Malone's an easier matchup for Webber, etc. I could go on. The Wolves are new to all this, Garnett has been absent during parts of this series, Cassell is hurt, Wally isn't healthy, Hassell and Hoiberg can't be expected to keep up their play. The only reason the Lakers would want to see the Kings is because they'd have homecourt, not because of the matchups.

I wish people would stop dragging out the "wolves are new to this" argument. This is a different team than past years. They might as well being wearing different jerseys. Garnett is the MVP, he'll be fine. Wally hasn't played a significant role this year; the fact that he (and troy hudson) are hurt is irrelevent. And I don't see why Hassell and Hoiberg won't keep up their performance. They're both great shooters (especially Hoiberg) and they're often left open. Plus Hassell is one of the best defenders in the league.
 

Excelsior

Lifer
May 30, 2002
19,047
18
81
Originally posted by: InstincT
Go Wolves... Just because I don't think the Kings have ANY chance of beating the Lakers.

I agree...that and I want the Twolves to win just cause I like them.
 

Reliant

Diamond Member
Mar 29, 2001
3,843
0
76
Originally posted by: CubicZirconia
Originally posted by: Reliant
Originally posted by: CaseTragedy
Originally posted by: Reliant
Originally posted by: CaseTragedy
The only reason I'm rooting for the Kings is because it'll make it easier on the Lakers. :evil:

The toughest match for the Lakers is the Kings, not the other way around.
Nah--I think it be easier taking the Kings than the Wolves. We get owned on Wolves court--and they'd have homecourt advantage.

Did you forget the Kings also took the season series 3-1? No one remembers that at all. The Kings even beat the Lakers at the end of the season when the Lakers were making that 14-3 streak. Bibby always works the Lakers, Miller and Vlade defend Shaq better than anyone can, Malone's an easier matchup for Webber, etc. I could go on. The Wolves are new to all this, Garnett has been absent during parts of this series, Cassell is hurt, Wally isn't healthy, Hassell and Hoiberg can't be expected to keep up their play. The only reason the Lakers would want to see the Kings is because they'd have homecourt, not because of the matchups.

I wish people would stop dragging out the "wolves are new to this" argument. This is a different team than past years. They might as well being wearing different jerseys. Garnett is the MVP, he'll be fine. Wally hasn't played a significant role this year; the fact that he (and troy hudson) are hurt is irrelevent. And I don't see why Hassell and Hoiberg won't keep up their performance. They're both great shooters (especially Hoiberg) and they're often left open. Plus Hassell is one of the best defenders in the league.

Have you watched all this series? Being new is very important. KG has at times had the deer in the headlights look. That's why Cassell and Spree are so important, they're supposed to take over when he's like that. With Cassell being hurt things now heavily lean on KG, and at times he's not been ready. He's made bad passes, traveled, taken horrible shots in crunch time this series.
 

fs5

Lifer
Jun 10, 2000
11,774
1
0
Originally posted by: zaku
is Jackson playing tonight?

no he's not. w/ peeler out it'll probably be the starters + brad + a little bit buford + and a little songaila
 

OrByte

Diamond Member
Jul 21, 2000
9,303
144
106
Bufford will actually present the same match up problems for the wolves as did Peeler. Hoiberg cant guard either one so hopefully Bufford will be able to take better advantage of the situation than peeler(who was actually shooting ice cold through the first 6 games)

KG has definitely had brainless moments, when was the last time he was called for traveling three times in a single game? if it wasnt for Latrell and ET then the wolves would have been dismissed already. Since ET has a bad back it is gonna be all about Latrell getting a hot streak...hopefully Christie and Bibby dont get into foul trouble and keep Latrell busy on both sides of the court.

I have my hopes up even though I shouldnt, I just wanna see a Kings/Lakers series soo bad!

go kings!
 
Jul 12, 2001
10,142
2
0
i havent decided who would be easier for the lakers...so i dont know who to root for. Who on the Twolves would be able to stop shaq?, but Kings the lakers get homecourt....hmmm
 

CaseTragedy

Platinum Member
Oct 24, 2000
2,690
0
0
Originally posted by: bR
just a note...Kings and Wolves are both 3-1 agains the Lakers...
Yes, but Lakers get home against Kings. Wolves get home against Lakers. :(

Of course Reliant made good points about Wolves inexperience.
 

masterxfob

Diamond Member
May 20, 2001
7,366
5
81
Originally posted by: Reliant
Originally posted by: CubicZirconia
Originally posted by: Reliant
Originally posted by: CaseTragedy
Originally posted by: Reliant
Originally posted by: CaseTragedy
The only reason I'm rooting for the Kings is because it'll make it easier on the Lakers. :evil:

The toughest match for the Lakers is the Kings, not the other way around.
Nah--I think it be easier taking the Kings than the Wolves. We get owned on Wolves court--and they'd have homecourt advantage.

Did you forget the Kings also took the season series 3-1? No one remembers that at all. The Kings even beat the Lakers at the end of the season when the Lakers were making that 14-3 streak. Bibby always works the Lakers, Miller and Vlade defend Shaq better than anyone can, Malone's an easier matchup for Webber, etc. I could go on. The Wolves are new to all this, Garnett has been absent during parts of this series, Cassell is hurt, Wally isn't healthy, Hassell and Hoiberg can't be expected to keep up their play. The only reason the Lakers would want to see the Kings is because they'd have homecourt, not because of the matchups.

I wish people would stop dragging out the "wolves are new to this" argument. This is a different team than past years. They might as well being wearing different jerseys. Garnett is the MVP, he'll be fine. Wally hasn't played a significant role this year; the fact that he (and troy hudson) are hurt is irrelevent. And I don't see why Hassell and Hoiberg won't keep up their performance. They're both great shooters (especially Hoiberg) and they're often left open. Plus Hassell is one of the best defenders in the league.

Have you watched all this series? Being new is very important. KG has at times had the deer in the headlights look. That's why Cassell and Spree are so important, they're supposed to take over when he's like that. With Cassell being hurt things now heavily lean on KG, and at times he's not been ready. He's made bad passes, traveled, taken horrible shots in crunch time this series.

first off, the season series is during the regular season. no one gives a flying fvck about the regular season, it's all about the playoffs.

as for the inexperience of KG, what about Webber?!?!?!!? you're crazy if you think Webber is a better player because of his "experience" in big pressure games.