Navy Seals Rescue Hostages

Page 2 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.

janas19

Platinum Member
Nov 10, 2011
2,313
1
0
I just have 2 things I want to say here:

These guys (the Seals) are heroes. I salute them with all sincerity.

I hope this action will serve as a deterrent to stop this criminal madness.

That is all.
 

Kadarin

Lifer
Nov 23, 2001
44,296
16
81
BHO isn't strong or weak when he orders SEAL's to go take out shitbag pirates, he's merely efficiently using his resources, nothing more.

Um, it is a sign of strength that Obama is willing and able to do this. A weak president would have been afraid to.
 

HomerJS

Lifer
Feb 6, 2002
39,539
33,088
136
Big ups to our military. Just shows great things can be accomplished when our men and women in uniform are used correctly.
 

chucky2

Lifer
Dec 9, 1999
10,018
37
91
Um, it is a sign of strength that Obama is willing and able to do this. A weak president would have been afraid to.

A "weak" president would have been afraid to? Afraid to what? Give their elite of the elite permission to invade a shithole country that has no hope in stopping them (and in this case, probably even detecting them), to go take on some POS terrorists who couldn't defeat our mainline troops, much less the elite of our elite...

...all planned and acted up by our military, on their timeline, with backup and air waiting in the wings?

I don't view this as a sign of 'strength', I view it as a normal decision any POTUS would be expected to make. For sure I'd consider a POTUS 'weak' for wimping out and not doing what needs to be done, but that doesn't mean when they do decide to order it done, that it's some strength.

Is it a display of strength when you (US) step on an ant (these POS's)? What about when a 5 year old does it (UK, France, other modern military)? What about when a baby (actual military of shithole nations) does it?

The result is the same, the ant is dead...you wouldn't run around and say you were strong or displayed strength stepping on the ant, would you?

Chuck
 

momeNt

Diamond Member
Jan 26, 2011
9,290
352
126
Was any of this filmed for that new upcoming movie featuring active duty navy seals? Act of valor I believe?
 

Doppel

Lifer
Feb 5, 2011
13,306
3
0
A "weak" president would have been afraid to? Afraid to what? Give their elite of the elite permission to invade a shithole country that has no hope in stopping them (and in this case, probably even detecting them), to go take on some POS terrorists who couldn't defeat our mainline troops, much less the elite of our elite...

...all planned and acted up by our military, on their timeline, with backup and air waiting in the wings?
Yes, if in doubt see black hawk down. Obama didn't shoot anybody but if he gave final approval he accepts some appraise or blame depending on how it goes.
 

OCGuy

Lifer
Jul 12, 2000
27,224
37
91
Those who say that it couldnt have gone badly not only are ignorant of the history of American military intervention in Somalia, but they don't like good movies either!
 

chucky2

Lifer
Dec 9, 1999
10,018
37
91
Yes, things can go badly. The chances of them going badly for this elite of elites group? Extremely low. Them needing to go through a whole militarized city to get out? Non-existent.

Obama deserves praise? Sure.

Thanks Obama for saying 'Go' and letting the military do what it does best.

There, I praised Obama. Happy?
 

sportage

Lifer
Feb 1, 2008
11,492
3,163
136
Makes me wonder.... "if" Obama had been elected president in 2000, most likely 9/11 would have never happen.
 

sportage

Lifer
Feb 1, 2008
11,492
3,163
136
Correction... "If" Obama had been elected president in 2000, 9/11 would have never happened. Not under his leadership.
 

feralkid

Lifer
Jan 28, 2002
16,916
5,018
136
Hey Chucky,



Just a quick question: Do you plan on going through the rest of your life with that incorrectly punctuated sig? Has no one pointed it out to you?

It just looks like hell.


gran-torino-clint-eastwood.jpg
 

sportage

Lifer
Feb 1, 2008
11,492
3,163
136
In addition... We'd still have a balance budget. A healthy surplus. Low unemployment. And some eight thousand Americans still alive.
If only Obama had been elected president in 2000. If only....
 

Nebor

Lifer
Jun 24, 2003
29,582
12
76
In addition... We'd still have a balance budget. A healthy surplus. Low unemployment. And some eight thousand Americans still alive.
If only Obama had been elected president in 2000. If only....

No one is disagreeing with you. The forum unanimously agrees.

But Obama didn't run in 2000. Thus, it could be argued, it's his fault that our deficit is huge, that our economy is in the toilet and that so many Americans are dead. If a firefighter sits and watches your house burn for 30 minutes before putting out the fire, leaving you with only burned rubble, do you thank him?
 

Ninjahedge

Diamond Member
Mar 2, 2005
4,149
1
91
I really am impressed with Obama's use of the military.

I think it is showing that surgical use of advanced forces is a more effective means for many operations as opposed to the old-school occupation mentality.

We'll see if this kind of thing continues, or if we still have ham-fists for most of our military operations.
 

rudder

Lifer
Nov 9, 2000
19,441
86
91
Somehow, GWB was responsible for this, just like OBL.

You can at least credit GWB for properly funding the military during his time in office. A lot of people mentioned Carter's failed mission. The military was a mess, every service wanted a part of the action, no flight training for that type of operation, etc... and it ended in failure.
 

Ninjahedge

Diamond Member
Mar 2, 2005
4,149
1
91
You can at least credit GWB for properly funding the military during his time in office.

No he didn't.

AAMOF, the $$s were not even allotted/tallied in any of his budgets.

It is easy to "fund" something on debt when you do not disclose it to anyone.

A lot of people mentioned Carter's failed mission. The military was a mess, every service wanted a part of the action, no flight training for that type of operation, etc... and it ended in failure.

I am not commenting on that. It failed and Carter got crap for it. The point being, the president can make what seems like an "easy" decision (as called out by one poster here), but that decision still has direct consequences on his ability to govern if it fails.