Nationalize the banks

Page 4 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.

Miramonti

Lifer
Aug 26, 2000
28,653
100
106
Ayn Rand would be rolling in her grave for the govt giving the banks so much money with so little in return. Nationalization of the banks at this point is simply a way of the govt taking control of what it essentially already paid more than full price for already (atleast many of those which have received fed funds.)
 

Modelworks

Lifer
Feb 22, 2007
16,240
7
76
This doesn't help matters:
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/...alizatio_n_168619.html

Feb. 20 (Bloomberg) -- Senate Banking Committee Chairman Christopher Dodd said it may be necessary to nationalize some banks for a short time as Citigroup Inc. and Bank of America Corp. tumbled today on concern the U.S. may take over both banks.

"I don't welcome that at all, but I could see how it's possible it may happen," Dodd said in an interview on Bloomberg Television's "Political Capital with Al Hunt" to be broadcast later today. "I'm concerned that we may end up having to do that, at least for a short time."

Anyone know what time that show is on ?

Edit:
Found it, Friday 6:30PM EST.

Well the Directv guide shows 7:30PM EST

Website says 6:30PM, might be a DST thing.

 

Jiggz

Diamond Member
Mar 10, 2001
4,329
0
76
Originally posted by: daveymark
<a target=_blank class=ftalternatingbarlinklarge href="http://www.ft.com/cms/s/0/e310cbf6-fd4e-11dd-a103-000077b07658.html
<b"><b">Text</a>




The US government may have to nationalise some banks on a temporary basis to fix the financial system and restore the flow of credit, Alan Greenspan, the former Federal Reserve chairman, has told the Financial Times.

In an interview, Mr Greenspan, who for decades was regarded as the high priest of laisser-faire capitalism, said nationalisation could be the least bad option left for policymakers.

?It may be necessary to temporarily nationalise some banks in order to facilitate a swift and orderly restructuring,? he said. ?I understand that once in a hundred years this is what you do.?

Mr Greenspan?s comments capped a frenetic day in which policymakers across the political spectrum appeared to be moving towards accepting some form of bank nationalisation.

?We should be focusing on what works,? Lindsey Graham, a Republican senator from South Carolina, told the FT. ?We cannot keep pouring good money after bad.? He added, ?If nationalisation is what works, then we should do it.?

Speaking to the FT ahead of a speech to the Economic Club of New York on Tuesday, Mr Greenspan said that ?in some cases, the least bad solution is for the government to take temporary control? of troubled banks either through the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation or some other mechanism.

The former Fed chairman said temporary government ownership would ?allow the government to transfer toxic assets to a bad bank without the problem of how to price them.?

But he cautioned that holders of senior debt ? bonds that would be paid off before other claims ? might have to be protected even in the event of nationalisation.

?You would have to be very careful about imposing any loss on senior creditors of any bank taken under government control because it could impact the senior debt of all other banks,? he said. ?This is a credit crisis and it is essential to preserve an anchor for the financing of the system. That anchor is the senior debt.?

Mr Greenspan?s comments came as President Barack Obama signed into law the $787bn fiscal stimulus in Denver, Colorado. Mr Obama will announce on Wednesday a $50bn programme for home foreclosure relief in Phoenix, Arizona. Meanwhile, the White House was working last night on the latest phase of the bailout for two of the big three US carmakers.

In his speech after signing the stimulus, which he called the ?most sweeping recovery package in our history?, Mr Obama set out a vertiginous timetable of federal decisions in the coming weeks that included fixing the US banking system, submission next week of the 2009 budget and a bipartisan White House meeting to address longer-term fiscal discipline.

?We need to end a culture where we ignore problems until they become full-blown crises,? said Mr Obama. ?Today does not mark the end of our economic troubles? but it does mark the beginning of the end.?

Looks like we're certainly headed in that direction. More and more are jumping onboard this idea. Is there any reason that this would not work? In Alan's defense, he is only saying we should nationalize SOME banks, and only temporarily.

Are you talking about the same A. Greenspan who put us into this mess in the first place?