NASA sees earliest manned moon landing in 2015

SVT Cobra

Lifer
Mar 29, 2005
13,264
2
0
LE BOURGET, France (Reuters) - The next mission to land a man on the moon will take place in 2015 at the earliest, the new chief of the United States' space program said on Monday, adding the mission could be followed by the construction of a multinational space station there.

But NASA has not yet decided what vehicles will be used to reach the moon, or what will succeed the aging space shuttle fleet, which is due to be retired in 2010.

"I don't have a specific date, but sometime between 2015, which is the earliest we think we can do it, and 2020, which would be the latest," said Michael Griffin, the new administrator of NASA, when asked at the Paris Air Show about NASA plans to return to the moon.

The last manned mission to the moon was NASA's Apollo 17 in 1972.

Griffin, who took over the top job at the U.S.'s National Aeronautics and Space Administration in April, is hoping to fulfil President Bush's high-profile plan to return humans to the moon and possibly to land on Mars.

"We have enough money to put people back on the moon in that timeframe," he said. "The model that I have is that we should build a lunar outpost similar to the kinds of multinational outposts we have in Antarctica."

NASA will make decisions on what craft will be used to reach the moon in the next few months, Griffin said: "I am hoping we will have some fairly firm conclusions by the end of this summer."

NASA is weighing up competing bids for the so-called Crew Exploration Vehicle (CEV), the successor to the space shuttle, which will be retired in 2010. The new vehicle is expected to be compatible with the International Space Station and to play a role in a manned mission to the moon.

The space shuttle fleet has not flown since 2003, when the Columbia shuttle broke apart in mid-air, killing its crew of seven.

An executive of Boeing Co., which is teaming up with Northrop Grumman Corp. to bid for the multi-billion dollar CEV contract, said on Monday he expected to hear very soon whether its bid would move to the next stage of NASA consideration.

"We're expecting to get notification from NASA even possibly today on whether we are going to be selected to be in the final two competitors," said Jim Albaugh, president of Boeing's integrated defense systems unit, at the air show.

Rival Lockheed Martin Corp. is also bidding on the CEV contract.





I always love following the new and latest space technology...especially in terms of the next shuttle or space craft ect...

I hope this will spark new interest in space travel again, the whole prospect of it is amazing to me, so its good to see we are going in the right direction. Excpet the date will probably really be in 2025.
 

yllus

Elite Member & Lifer
Aug 20, 2000
20,577
432
126
"We have enough money to put people back on the moon in that timeframe," he said. "The model that I have is that we should build a lunar outpost similar to the kinds of multinational outposts we have in Antarctica."
Oh, that's sexy.
 

FoBoT

No Lifer
Apr 30, 2001
63,084
15
81
fobot.com
is it a good idea, to build this "outpost"?
how is it more useful than the spacestation they just built? more room to pile stuff up?
 

Leros

Lifer
Jul 11, 2004
21,867
7
81
The only thing good about the moon is that it has no atmposhere and would be a great place to set up a station. However, the International space station allows for the same sort of thing.
 
Feb 10, 2000
30,029
67
91
Congrats to NASA for spending billions of dollars to re-create what was an incredible accomplishment 47 years earlier. Maybe while they're at it, they can send more monkeys into orbit . . .
 

SagaLore

Elite Member
Dec 18, 2001
24,036
21
81
I would rather see them focus all of their (our) money into colonizing Mars.
 

SVT Cobra

Lifer
Mar 29, 2005
13,264
2
0
Originally posted by: JToxic
The only thing good about the moon is that it has no atmposhere and would be a great place to set up a station. However, the International space station allows for the same sort of thing.


except i think the moon would have more space/stability to support more research and it could be used launching platform for larger and more complex space probes and things
 

meltdown75

Lifer
Nov 17, 2004
37,548
7
81
Originally posted by: DonVito
Congrats to NASA for spending billions of dollars to re-create what was an incredible accomplishment 47 years earlier. Maybe while they're at it, they can send more monkeys into orbit . . .

:thumbsup: i say we spend billions looking for some WMDs instead. monkeys in space are very important, but let's try to prioritize here... :p
 

scorpmatt

Diamond Member
Feb 8, 2001
7,040
97
91
Apparently they still havn't figured out if the moon is made out of cheese yet

ah, behold the power of cheese
 

Spike

Diamond Member
Aug 27, 2001
6,770
1
81
Originally posted by: blahblah99
How about we spend billions solving the problems at home first. Oh wait, what problems.

whoa, P&N alert! Everyone hit the deck!
 

m2kewl

Diamond Member
Oct 7, 2001
8,263
0
0
right now, nasa couldn't even put a snail back in space.

let's set REALISTIC goals please. ;)
 

brigden

Diamond Member
Dec 22, 2002
8,702
2
81
Originally posted by: DonVito
Congrats to NASA for spending billions of dollars to re-create what was an incredible accomplishment 47 years earlier. Maybe while they're at it, they can send more monkeys into orbit . . .

Heh.

Seriously, why bother sending men back to the moon? The first time was political - how does this differ? I don't mean to sound like a liberal, but I can't believe that you operate a society that would deem this important. I mean, human spirit and all that rubbish, but there are still people starving in your country - the richest, most powerful country in the world...
 

Krk3561

Diamond Member
Jun 12, 2002
3,242
0
0
Originally posted by: brigden
Originally posted by: DonVito
Congrats to NASA for spending billions of dollars to re-create what was an incredible accomplishment 47 years earlier. Maybe while they're at it, they can send more monkeys into orbit . . .

Heh.

Seriously, why bother sending men back to the moon? The first time was political - how does this differ? I don't mean to sound like a liberal, but I can't believe that you operate a society that would deem this important. I mean, human spirit and all that rubbish, but there are still people starving in your country - the richest, most powerful country in the world...

Stay in Canada, you dirty Canadian! Trying to put down our space program. You get one, then we can talk.
 

Kadarin

Lifer
Nov 23, 2001
44,296
16
81
Originally posted by: blahblah99
How about we spend billions solving the problems at home first. Oh wait, what problems.

Yeah, you're right. We need to be spending our money on tobacco subsidies and abstinence-only faith-based indoctrination programs instead.. Never mind the future of the human race. Why the hell would we need to look forward? Silly idea...
 

brigden

Diamond Member
Dec 22, 2002
8,702
2
81
Originally posted by: Krk3561
Originally posted by: brigden
Originally posted by: DonVito
Congrats to NASA for spending billions of dollars to re-create what was an incredible accomplishment 47 years earlier. Maybe while they're at it, they can send more monkeys into orbit . . .

Heh.

Seriously, why bother sending men back to the moon? The first time was political - how does this differ? I don't mean to sound like a liberal, but I can't believe that you operate a society that would deem this important. I mean, human spirit and all that rubbish, but there are still people starving in your country - the richest, most powerful country in the world...

Stay in Canada, you dirty Canadian! Trying to put down our space program. You get one, then we can talk.

Hey, man! We invented the Canadarm, man!
 

SVT Cobra

Lifer
Mar 29, 2005
13,264
2
0
Originally posted by: brigden
Originally posted by: DonVito
Congrats to NASA for spending billions of dollars to re-create what was an incredible accomplishment 47 years earlier. Maybe while they're at it, they can send more monkeys into orbit . . .

Heh.

Seriously, why bother sending men back to the moon? The first time was political - how does this differ? I don't mean to sound like a liberal, but I can't believe that you operate a society that would deem this important. I mean, human spirit and all that rubbish, but there are still people starving in your country - the richest, most powerful country in the world...


hey, your thing may be people starving, mine might be why the hell are there people in the first place exsisting on our planet to be able to starve in the first place...you see the small...i see the big...

plus lets say something happens and we need to understand "life" better we and all those starving people are screwed...

i am sorry, i was rude, but if you aren't searching for the meaning of life...IMO, you arent doing all that much to better the understanding of humans...from a non-emotional point of view...not to say that people are starving and who cares. That is extremely important, that food needs to get to those children and people. I agree, we can do better to fix problems here, but that is not to say we cannot move on in our search for better understanding.

EDIT:

Originally posted by: Astaroth33
Originally posted by: blahblah99
How about we spend billions solving the problems at home first. Oh wait, what problems.

Yeah, you're right. We need to be spending our money on tobacco subsidies and abstinence-only faith-based indoctrination programs instead.. Never mind the future of the human race. Why the hell would we need to look forward? Silly idea...

ehh, he said it better
 

Linflas

Lifer
Jan 30, 2001
15,395
78
91
Originally posted by: iamwiz82
Why are they going back?

We should have had colonies there by now and be well on the way in manned exploration of Mars.