Originally posted by: ElFenix
like is pointed out, this isn't kiddie porn, this is soliciting sex from someone you know is a minor (although they're not)
Originally posted by: aidanjm
I wonder how this kind of entrapment can be legal? 😕
yeh, you better be real careful. 😛Originally posted by: aidanjm
I wonder how this kind of entrapment can be legal? 😕
Originally posted by: talyn00
a former teacher of mine was caught in a sting like this a year or so ago
Originally posted by: NFS4
Originally posted by: ElFenix
like is pointed out, this isn't kiddie porn, this is soliciting sex from someone you know is a minor (although they're not)
Well the porn part was taking from the original article...
That being said, I hope that they mess him up. I hate scum like that
Originally posted by: Queasy
I'm still amazed that there are guys out there who try this...
I mean seriously, we get stories like this everyday now. Makes you wonder how many don't get caught....
most of them are just looking for attention from the opposite sex. period.Originally posted by: Cooler
Originally posted by: Queasy
I'm still amazed that there are guys out there who try this...
I mean seriously, we get stories like this everyday now. Makes you wonder how many don't get caught....
also makes me wonder how may 13 year olds are looking for older men.
Originally posted by: NFS4
Originally posted by: aidanjm
I wonder how this kind of entrapment can be legal? 😕
Entrapment????? How did they force him to pursue sex with a "13 year old"
Originally posted by: edro
Anyone else think that site looks amazingly like Anandtech?
Originally posted by: NFS4
Originally posted by: edro
Anyone else think that site looks amazingly like Anandtech?
1) Go to Anandtech.com
2) Look at the news listings on the right
3) ...
4) Profit?
Originally posted by: Ime
He might argue entrapment, but it's gonna be hard to get 12 parents of young teenage girls to listen to that arguement.
The dude is screwed, literally. Bubba's gonna make him his g/f.
ENTRAPMENT - A person is 'entrapped' when he is induced or persuaded by law enforcement officers or their agents to commit a crime that he had no previous intent to commit; and the law as a matter of policy forbids conviction in such a case.
However, there is no entrapment where a person is ready and willing to break the law and the Government agents merely provide what appears to be a favorable opportunity for the person to commit the crime. For example, it is not entrapment for a Government agent to pretend to be someone else and to offer, either directly or through an informer or other decoy, to engage in an unlawful transaction with the person. So, a person would not be a victim of entrapment if the person was ready, willing and able to commit the crime charged in the indictment whenever opportunity was afforded, and that Government officers or their agents did no more than offer an opportunity.
On the other hand, if the evidence leaves a reasonable doubt whether the person had any intent to commit the crime except for inducement or persuasion on the part of some Government officer or agent, then the person is not guilty.
In slightly different words: Even though someone may have [sold drugs], as charged by the government, if it was the result of entrapment then he is not guilty. Government agents entrapped him if three things occurred:
- First, the idea for committing the crime came from the government agents and not from the person accused of the crime.
- Second, the government agents then persuaded or talked the person into committing the crime. Simply giving him the opportunity to commit the crime is not the same as persuading him to commit the crime.
- And third, the person was not ready and willing to commit the crime before the government agents spoke with him.