Hayabusa Rider
Admin Emeritus & Elite Member
- Jan 26, 2000
- 50,879
- 4,265
- 126
If it was a manned craft would you want to be on it for that landing sequence?
I shouldn't be surprised if something very similar is used for manned flight.
If it was a manned craft would you want to be on it for that landing sequence?
If it was a manned craft would you want to be on it for that landing sequence?
Hey, I didn't make that up. It's in their mythology of the Koran.
Like the bible is full of less fairytales, you are an idiot.
What an idiotic thing to say. Do you have supporting evidence the Bible is full of fairy tales?
Like the bible is full of less fairytales, you are an idiot.
I do. The Bible is my evidence, which contains volumes of impossible and nonsensical tales.
On the actual thread topic, the next thing I want to see them do is recover a vehicle from Mars. A round trip is what we need to start to paved the way for more manned exploration of the solar system.
I do. The Bible is my evidence, which contains volumes of impossible and nonsensical tales.
On the actual thread topic, the next thing I want to see them do is recover a vehicle from Mars. A round trip is what we need to start to paved the way for more manned exploration of the solar system.
On the actual thread topic, the next thing I want to see them do is recover a vehicle from Mars. A round trip is what we need to start to paved the way for more manned exploration of the solar system.
When the point you are requesting evidence for is completely and totally off topic, yes, that is all the more involved I am going to get. If you want to discuss whether the Bible and its claims of a flood that requires more than three times the amount of water on Earth to work, or a planet's rotation stopping suddenly, or a zombie army descending on Jerusalem are historically accurate, by all means, find a news article related to it and start a new thread or just post one in off topic. Either way, a thread about the Mars rover is not the place to discuss comparative religion.Ah the "here is google, that is my proof" line of thinking. I understand you better now.
What makes sense is a one way trip to Mars. Packages can be sent there to create a permanent settlement in modules. The team assembles everything and that includes production facilities for fuel, water, air, food etc, At that point another ship can be sent without need of return fuel or supplies. Once landed the team can restock that vessel and return. Wash, repeat.
When the point you are requesting evidence for is completely and totally off topic, yes, that is all the more involved I am going to get. If you want to discuss whether the Bible and its claims of a flood that requires more than three times the amount of water on Earth to work, or a planet's rotation stopping suddenly, or a zombie army descending on Jerusalem are historically accurate, by all means, find a news article related to it and start a new thread or just post one in off topic. Either way, a thread about the Mars rover is not the place to discuss comparative religion.
What makes sense is a one way trip to Mars. Packages can be sent there to create a permanent settlement in modules. The team assembles everything and that includes production facilities for fuel, water, air, food etc, At that point another ship can be sent without need of return fuel or supplies. Once landed the team can restock that vessel and return. Wash, repeat.
What makes sense is a one way trip to Mars. Packages can be sent there to create a permanent settlement in modules. The team assembles everything and that includes production facilities for fuel, water, air, food etc, At that point another ship can be sent without need of return fuel or supplies. Once landed the team can restock that vessel and return. Wash, repeat.
Why mention it if you are going to run from it when challenged? You post something ludicrious and then act shocked when called on it and say people should not challenge you on it.
Just keep that in mind for next time you do not want to be challenged for something you are about to post.
If you want to challenge me on it, use an appropriate venue. I'll gladly address any claims you would care to make in the appropriate place at the appropriate time. I will not discuss this with you any further here and will assume any additional attempts to continue derailing the thread with this line to be an attempt on your part to get in the last word and claim victory without having to back up your claims. Either take it to a new thread or drop it, your choice.
The problem I see with this is that politics may eventually decide that the cost of restocking the settlement is too high. Without a way to bring them back, the explorers would be essentially given a death sentence.
It's not like they could hunt and forage for their own food on Mars. (as far as we know at this time anyway...)