ProfJohn
Lifer
- Jul 28, 2006
- 18,161
- 7
- 0
[/quote]
Lame excuse. "I can't tell you where I went shoping because my lawyer told me not too."
What kind of advice was she getting?
Most innocent people are willing to do everything, answer every question and go out of their way to prove their innocence.
Edit: Her ex-to be husband agreed to a polygraph, guess he had nothing to hide.
LunarRay
Diamond Member
- Mar 2, 2003
- 9,993
- 1
- 76
Grace is a former prosecutor. She is currently a role filler on a TV show. She does what she gets paid to do. Remember there is the role of the prosecutor to consider... they believe in their case when they bring it and not in the innocence of the person they have brought before the bar.
I don't think for a minute that Grace was on a verbal trip to find a video tape of anything.. the FBI or Police would have covered that base already... Grace was 'badgering the witness' .... Objection... asked and answered.. !!!
It is obvious to me that her attorney should not have allowed her to be on any show that didn't further her own position.. her attorney has her for a client not the missing child.
The tragedy IMO is that there is a presumption of guilt resident in many posters in this thread and not one of us knows the details or the forensic evidence thus far generated with certainty or completeness..
What we can assume to be true is that a woman is dead presumably by her own hand and some event caused that. Guilt perhaps but if so she'd not have been on that show.. too many reasons why not.. Totally stressed out.. likely and consistent with suicidal behavior.. IMO..
The child is missing apparently.. some one caused that.. Perhaps Guilt and the associated stress of that so if that is the case then Nancy Grace is likely the stimuli that caused the event... IMO
I don't think for a minute that Grace was on a verbal trip to find a video tape of anything.. the FBI or Police would have covered that base already... Grace was 'badgering the witness' .... Objection... asked and answered.. !!!
It is obvious to me that her attorney should not have allowed her to be on any show that didn't further her own position.. her attorney has her for a client not the missing child.
The tragedy IMO is that there is a presumption of guilt resident in many posters in this thread and not one of us knows the details or the forensic evidence thus far generated with certainty or completeness..
What we can assume to be true is that a woman is dead presumably by her own hand and some event caused that. Guilt perhaps but if so she'd not have been on that show.. too many reasons why not.. Totally stressed out.. likely and consistent with suicidal behavior.. IMO..
The child is missing apparently.. some one caused that.. Perhaps Guilt and the associated stress of that so if that is the case then Nancy Grace is likely the stimuli that caused the event... IMO
no, there is a presumption that she knew more than what she claimed based soley on the evidence presented and her reluctance to answer questions that may help find her child.
I have no respect for Nancy Grace. She portrays herself as a guardian of justice and advocate for the abused, but she is all show biz and ego gratification.
The problem with family members is that they are advised to go public and use the media to facilitate the resolution of their unfortunate incident. This leads to some embarrassing situations for them when the media starts pumping them for details.
The question we all need to deal with: How would you conduct yourself if your wife, girlfriend or daughter was in trouble and you were on a tv show discussing it?
The problem with family members is that they are advised to go public and use the media to facilitate the resolution of their unfortunate incident. This leads to some embarrassing situations for them when the media starts pumping them for details.
The question we all need to deal with: How would you conduct yourself if your wife, girlfriend or daughter was in trouble and you were on a tv show discussing it?
I watched that show the other day and what I could not understand why she yammered on about polygraph this and polygraph that. It was like oh well you dont take a polypragh you must be gulity. And was was worse she asked the FBI about the polygraph and the FBI agent agreed with Nancy that there should be a polygraph.
For those who do not know a polygraph test is crap, it will more often say a innocent person is guilty and a guilty person innocent.
For those who do not know a polygraph test is crap, it will more often say a innocent person is guilty and a guilty person innocent.
LunarRay
Diamond Member
- Mar 2, 2003
- 9,993
- 1
- 76
Well.. lets see... IF INNOCENT.... then her actions may be in keeping with the instructions given her by the Officials investigating and your statement would go towards guilt.
IF GUILTY.... then her actions may be in keeping with that... and still your statement would go toward guilt...
Finding the child in either case is the job of the investigators and WE don't know what they know or have said to her regarding this matter...
Starbuck1975
Lifer
- Jan 6, 2005
- 14,698
- 1,909
- 126
True, but Grace made a determination of guilt well before the trial even started....she was on the war path against Peterson based on his character, which granted wasn't all that great...but last I checked, being an a-hole isn't a part of the legal criteria used to establish guilt.
Don't even get me started on the Peterson trial...now, I think he did it, but I don't think there was enough evidence to prove he did it...and the media circus that followed the case is as disturbing as the actual murder of Laci.
techs
Lifer
- Sep 26, 2000
- 28,559
- 4
- 0
Actual title of this post should be:
Suspected killer gives interview with Nancy Grace to deflect suspicion away from herself. Woman is asked tough questions by Grace.
Woman committs suicide.
Woman is primary suspect by police.
Did the woman kill herself over guilt over what she did to her kids?
Or did a woman whose primarily responsibility was to get her kids back mysteriously "freak" out over some tough questions?
Oh, well. I guess brief, theatrical thread titles work better
Suspected killer gives interview with Nancy Grace to deflect suspicion away from herself. Woman is asked tough questions by Grace.
Woman committs suicide.
Woman is primary suspect by police.
Did the woman kill herself over guilt over what she did to her kids?
Or did a woman whose primarily responsibility was to get her kids back mysteriously "freak" out over some tough questions?
Oh, well. I guess brief, theatrical thread titles work better
SERIOUSLY. You might be innocent in that you don't go to jail, but try getting a job or having a normal social life ever again after the media gets word of your story.
Yeah, exactly...
Maybe this lady did murder her son, but honestly I'd still rather we as a society try to salvage her life, rather than push her toward suicide. The fact that this is broadcast nationally makes it even worse.
TRENDING THREADS
-
Discussion Zen 5 Speculation (EPYC Turin and Strix Point/Granite Ridge - Ryzen 9000)- Started by DisEnchantment
- Replies: 20K
-
Discussion Intel current and future Lakes & Rapids thread- Started by TheF34RChannel
- Replies: 23K
-
Discussion Intel Meteor, Arrow, Lunar & Panther Lakes Discussion Threads
- Started by Tigerick
- Replies: 12K
-
Discussion Speculation: Zen 4 (EPYC 4 "Genoa", Ryzen 7000, etc.)- Started by Vattila
- Replies: 13K
-
Facebook
Twitter