Naming winter storms.

techs

Lifer
Sep 26, 2000
28,559
4
0
Re: Nemo

http://www.accuweather.com/en/weather-news/twcs-plan-to-name-winter-storm/83168

The Weather Channel announced Tuesday that they planned to start naming winter storms, similar to how the National Weather Service names tropical systems. Why?

"-Naming a storm raises awareness.
-Attaching a name makes it much easier to follow a weather system’s progress.
-A storm with a name takes on a personality all its own, which adds to awareness.
-In today’s social media world, a name makes it much easier to reference in communication.
-A named storm is easier to remember and refer to in the future."

http://www.nytimes.com/2013/02/09/us/winter-storms-name-means-very-little.html?_r=0

The National Weather Service seems to agree(there is no need to name winter storms); it has advised its forecasters not to follow the channel’s lead, and a spokesman said it had never named winter storms and had no plans to do so. (The New York Times advises reporters not to use the names in storm coverage.)


Anyone care about this?
 
Last edited:

CPA

Elite Member
Nov 19, 2001
30,322
4
0
I thought the same thing. I was thinking "hmmm, when I was a kid living in upstate NY, storms never had names"

I think it's a media thing. Helps personalize the storm and draw viewers in.
 

shortylickens

No Lifer
Jul 15, 2003
80,287
17,082
136
"Which adds to awareness"

Bullshit. It adds to entertainment and since the regular news is now nothing more than a ratings game, the fucking weather people have to do the same to keep up.

Anybody here remember when we had a thing called journalism?
 

Jeff7

Lifer
Jan 4, 2001
41,596
20
81
"Which adds to awareness"

Bullshit. It adds to entertainment and since the regular news is now nothing more than a ratings game, the fucking weather people have to do the same to keep up.

Anybody here remember when we had a thing called journalism?
Yeah, that.....OH GOD YOUR AVATAR IS A CUTE LITTLE KITTY!!!! I wish the news covered nothing but stories about cats being adorable!



What were we talking about?
 

Charles Kozierok

Elite Member
May 14, 2012
6,762
1
0
The Weather Channel announced Tuesday that they planned to start naming winter storms, similar to how the National Weather Service names tropical systems. Why?

Because they're attention-whoring morons. If I hear "Nemo" one more time this week, I'm going to scream.

Tropical cyclones need names for three reasons. One, they can last for weeks. Two, they move unpredictably. Three, there can be several of them active at one time.

None of those apply to winter storms.
 

Charles Kozierok

Elite Member
May 14, 2012
6,762
1
0
This thread inspired me to write a full-fledged rant that I posted on Facebook. :)

Could someone please find whoever decided to start naming winter storms and smack him or her upside the head a few times? Apparently this was started by the Weather Channel, one of the worse places ever to get weather information IMO. The place is run by a bunch of attention whores, so no surprise that they were behind this. I only hope it doesn't catch on.

Tropical cyclones need names for three reasons:

1. They can last for weeks, so you need a way to refer to them.
2. They can move unpredictably and erratically, so it's not obvious where a storm is now relative to where it will be in a week.
3. There can be several of them active at one time, so if they aren't named, it can get confusing.

None of those apply to winter storms. They move west to east or up the east coast, they are gone in a couple of days, and there's never more than one real storm going at a time.

We had an old system that worked just fine: the date of the storm. Begone with "Nemo" and the other cutesy nonsense.
 

IronWing

No Lifer
Jul 20, 2001
73,209
34,543
136
They need to sell naming rights. "Tomorrow's forecast calls for increasing winds and increasing cloud cover as the Toro Death-by-Snow winter storm system approaches our area."
 

Jeff7

Lifer
Jan 4, 2001
41,596
20
81
lol that's hilarious. Are they going to name every thunder storm too when it's summer?
That depends on how their little ratings experiment turns out.


They need to sell naming rights. "Tomorrow's forecast calls for increasing winds and increasing cloud cover as the Toro Death-by-Snow winter storm system approaches our area."
Oh god please no shutupshutupshutupshutup.
 

weadjust

Senior member
Mar 28, 2004
636
0
71
28928_512049642171960_732009008_n.jpg
 

SKORPI0

Lifer
Jan 18, 2000
18,500
2,426
136
Perhaps when earthquakes will become predictable they will also be named, before it happens. ^_^:awe:
 

AMCRambler

Diamond Member
Jan 23, 2001
7,715
31
91
All this did was freak people out. They were like "Oh my God they named it? Get out of the way I need gas and generators and food. As much as you have."

Seriously I left work late on Thursday and usually at 6:30 the roads are empty. It was friggin mobbed. Run on the grocery stores, gas you name it. So stupid. This is upstate ny w know better than that.
 

DrPizza

Administrator Elite Member Goat Whisperer
Mar 5, 2001
49,601
167
111
www.slatebrookfarm.com
As everyone else realizes, it's for ratings, and nothing more. Their sensationalism of the weather has led to other stations sensationalizing the weather as well.

Here's their formula. Take the National Weather Service's forecast, and add 50% more of whatever it calls for. 8" of snow in NYC predicted? Let's make it "1 to 2 feet." First I get my weather forecast from NOAA. Then, I glance at other sites. It's amazing how close NOAA comes, and how everyone else seems to make the exception their forecast for everyone. E.g., we know that in Western NY, a narrow 3 mile wide band of snow might dump a lot of snow, and that in particular locations - the first big hills, they will receive a hell of a lot of snow. But, that becomes "much of western NY will be blanketed by up to 2 feet of snow! Why you should panic and tune into our station coming up after the commercials." Meanwhile, NOAA's forecast: 2 to 3 inches of snow for most of Western NY, though a belt of snow moving in from Lake Erie may dump a foot or more snow onto a couple of hills in the ski region.
 

Jeff7

Lifer
Jan 4, 2001
41,596
20
81
As everyone else realizes, it's for ratings, and nothing more. Their sensationalism of the weather has led to other stations sensationalizing the weather as well.
Same sort of phenomenon.


Here's their formula. Take the National Weather Service's forecast, and add 50% more of whatever it calls for. 8" of snow in NYC predicted? Let's make it "1 to 2 feet." First I get my weather forecast from NOAA. Then, I glance at other sites. It's amazing how close NOAA comes, and how everyone else seems to make the exception their forecast for everyone. E.g., we know that in Western NY, a narrow 3 mile wide band of snow might dump a lot of snow, and that in particular locations - the first big hills, they will receive a hell of a lot of snow. But, that becomes "much of western NY will be blanketed by up to 2 feet of snow! Why you should panic and tune into our station coming up after the commercials." Meanwhile, NOAA's forecast: 2 to 3 inches of snow for most of Western NY, though a belt of snow moving in from Lake Erie may dump a foot or more snow onto a couple of hills in the ski region.
Might you use this site, perchance?
They've got some neat probability maps there.

I was warned by family about a big blizzard en route.
1) A big snowstorm of note for this region would have to be pretty bad for me to consider it a serious concern. Snowy day = Oh well, get to work on time.
2) That NOAA map placed me in the 50% chance for even seeing more than 4 inches of snow.
It ended up being some rain and a few inches of snow. Nothing major at all.

Related note: I'm paranoid now about the Weather Underground site, since they sold the organization to The Weather Channel. Time to get out the straitjackets and mittens, so that website visitors can't hurt themselves on dangerous things like maps and numbers.
 
Last edited:

Slew Foot

Lifer
Sep 22, 2005
12,379
96
86
They need to sell naming rights. "Tomorrow's forecast calls for increasing winds and increasing cloud cover as the Toro Death-by-Snow winter storm system approaches our area."

Hey that could solve the budget deficit.

"New Englanders live in fear as Winter storm Trojan dumps piles of liquid on the region"
 

todpod

Golden Member
Nov 10, 2001
1,275
0
76
The bad part its going to catch on. The weather underground was using it and people at work kept using "nemo" when they were talking about it.
 

techs

Lifer
Sep 26, 2000
28,559
4
0
The bad part its going to catch on. The weather underground was using it and people at work kept using "nemo" when they were talking about it.

Actually I assume the Weather Channel is waiting for it to catch on then charge for using the names.