My systems: Scrapping one, Upgrading another and Building a Third.

AJeightFive

Member
Dec 10, 2004
34
0
0
This might get a bit long...

System #1:
- 5yrs old, over-worked, poorly maintained, case yellowed by 5 years of sunlight
- Pentium III 533Mhz, 384MB PC-100, ATI Rage 128, 20 GB HD which is ALWAYS has 99% free space
- 17" monitor, missing one of the brightness pins (it seems) picture is so dark, I think it might actually be absorbing more light than it emits
- Heavily soiled 102 key mulimedia keyboard and optical mouse which I'm positive could provide shocking advances in bacteriological warfare techniques

Info:
This system has been worked into the ground by my dad and younger brother, neither of whom could use a computer to find their way out of a paper bag. I can't imagine anyone wanting to buy it. I'd feel incredibly guilty selling it anway, knowing the anguish that person would experience "trying" to use it. My question is whether there are companies that take old parts and recycle them for a bit of cash, or if there is anything else I can do with it besides leaving it on the curb or hiding it in the attic?

System#2: Current:
- S478 P4 2.66Ghz w/HT (overclocked to a stable 2.75Ghz) 800Mhz FSB
- Abit IS7-E I865i
- 1024GB generic mish-mash DDR400 CL3 (suprisingly stable when overclocked, but incapable of operating at CL2, unsure wether this is single or dual channel memory)
- ATI 9800 Pro 128MB DDR AGP 8x
- Creative Labs Sound Blaster Audigy 2
- 1 40GB and 1 80GB 7200RPM UDMA hard drive
- Enermax D43028 350W PSU

Info:
This is my current system. I bought it two years ago from a local store a friend recommended for $2500CAD. I think if I'd been smart I'd have built it myself, saved a few hundred dollars and been more careful about what components I included (ie brand name RAM). I've been able to overclock all of the components reliably, thanks to the consistently low temperatures inside my case. It's time for me to upgrade though, so I'm going to be replacing all of its major components and using them to build System #3, my dads new system in a new case at stock temperatures with a lot of idiot-proofing. I've been reading a lot of comparison articles, forum posts, and reviews to try and determine which new parts to buy and have a pretty good idea of what I want. I'm hoping that you, the Anandtech community, will be able to provide some guidance, answer a few questions, and point out any incompatibilities that I may have missed, before I go spend a whole whack of cash again.

Here are what I have in mind for the upgraded System #2 and the new System #3 at the moment.

System #2:
- Motherboard: Somewhat undecided, I was originally going to go with the 925 or 915 chipset to have PCIe and DDR2 but I need to complete this project before Christmas (the new system is a gift to my dad) and I have been unable to find any retailers selling competitively priced PCIe GPU's that aren't back ordered until new years at the earliest. It also appears, from lab tests that DDR2 isn't much faster than lower latency DDR (while being 30-50% more expensive) at the moment and may go the way of RAMBUS. With those considerations in mind I'm now looking the 865PE chipset. I don't have any experience with AMD but would consider going this route if significant and well documented advantages exist.
- Processor: If I stick with the 865PE (most likely since I will be hard to sell on AMD simply due to my familiarity with Intel components) I will be upgrading to either the P4 530 or 540 processors (3.0 and 3.2Ghz respectively, both with 1M L2 Cache and 800Mhz FSB). Are the extra 200Mhz of the P4 540 worth the extra $50?
- GPU: I have been a long supporter of ATI cards but am finding myself drawn to the eVGA GeForce 6800 GT 256MB. As I mentioned before, I had originally wanted to go the PCIe route to open up the potential for an SLI set up down the road. The AGP 8x 6800 GT is at the price point I am looking for and supports SM3.0 which leads me to believe it will be more future-proof in that department than say an ATI X800 XT. The cooling solution looks mighty spiffy on the eVGA card too ;).
- Memory: I havn't decided on specifics here yet. It would have been DDR2 as required by the 925 and 915 chipsets. With the 865PE chipset I am looking at 1024-1536MB of DDR. My biggest question regarding memory choice is speed. I see offerings of DDR at 400, 500, 533, 550Mhz but havn't come across any 865PE motherboards that support greater than 400Mhz dual channel DDR. Am I missing something here?
- Power Supply: I'm not sure about this one. My current power supply is an Enermax D43028 rated at 350W. With the new components I am throwing in will it be necessar to upgrade? I intend to overclock down the road but probably no more than 5%. After upgrading I will have 2 Hard Drives, 2 Optical Drives and an Audigy 2 in addition to the components above.

On to the new system, which will for the most part inheriting my old parts. I'm not too worried about hardware compatibility here since I know the major components work well together. I intend to build the system into an Antec Sonata case which is smaller than the full tower that the parts came out of (the reduced size, and therefore airflow is one reason I won't be overclocking this time around), but everything should still fit if the Sonato supports a standard ATX motherboard right? Also, while looking for a new LCD monitor for this system I have come across several that have a 15Pin D-Sub connector. The ATI 9800 Pro that it will be interfacing with has sVideo, DVI and VGA output. Is the D-sub connection something entirely different or just another name for one of these interfaces? I'm not really familiar with LCD tech since the last monitors I bought was a CRT. My dad is sold on the idea of having a flat screen though, but I'd like to keep the cost down. Any recommendations here would be appreciated.

That's all for now, sorry it's so long. All help is welcome, thanks in advance
AJ
 

DaveSimmons

Elite Member
Aug 12, 2001
40,730
670
126
Sonata fits all ATX, it's just shorter than the old monster cases by taking away the 4th 5.25" drive bay.

15 pin D-sub = VGA.

For the P3 system, there might be someone in your area that takes the parts, or you can offer them in the FS/T forum here. Read the forum rules first, and you might put (Canada) in your title so Canucks know they won't have customs / border issues.

If your dad doesn't game, you could also trade the 9800 Pro for cash plus a non-gamer card, or just cash (and buy something). In the US, a used 9800 Pro is easily worth $100-125 USD if it has no problems, and you can get non-gamer cards as cheap as $30 USD. Trade or buy something with DVI connector though since the picture is better on a LCD than using a VGA connection.

For yourself, at stock speeds an Athlon A64 is much better for gaming than a P4 at the same price, but since your overclocking some people will say to buy a P4 2.4C or 2.8E and massively overclock.

I don't overclock so I can't really comment on that except to point out you can get an A64 3000+ that's the same speed as a P4 3.2E in games for just over $150 USD. I'm lazy so I'd rather just spend a little more, run at stock speed, and enjoy the instant stability with zero tweaking.

Finally, to look for Canadian computer parts company, the Advanced Search feature can find you several archived threads on the subject.
 

AJeightFive

Member
Dec 10, 2004
34
0
0
Thanks Dave, suprised to see someone made it through my post that fast.

My thoughts in keeping the 9800 Pro in my dad's system were to support Longhorn's rumoured requirement for a DX9.0 video card. It never came across my mind that I could "trade down" and save a few bucks. I believe the lower end ATI cards (thinking along 9200 lines) are fully DX9.0 compliant as well so I wouldn't have to sacrifice that capability. Thanks for the recommendation, I'll definitely be looking into that (would eBay be a good place to sell the 9800? or are there better channels I can go through?).

As far as processors go, I would prefer not to overclock if I don't have to. A friend commented the other day that Athlon's run much hotter than Intel processors which turned me off at first, but if overclocking isn't necessary that wouldn't be such a problem.

 

DaveSimmons

Elite Member
Aug 12, 2001
40,730
670
126
Your friend has it backwards -- the A64 processors put out much less heat than the P4s, partly because they do the same amount of work with a much slower clockspeed, just like intel's own Pentium M ("bananas") chips for laptops.

Read a few articles under the "CPU/Chipsets" tab to see what I mean.

eBay might be the best place to sell, as long as you're careful not to sell to someone who pays with a fake wire transfer, bad check, or forged money order. The FS/T forum here is good, at least if you deal with someone who has a decent number of posts and "Heatware" evaluations (similar to eBay feedback).
 

AJeightFive

Member
Dec 10, 2004
34
0
0
There are still a couple of unanswered questions that I would like to address before I start making purchases.

1. I am considering going the AMD route and have read a few Anandtech articles on the new chipsets, however AMD tech is still new to me. It appears that the fastest supported memory is PC-3200, DDR400, is this correct? If so, I would be concerned that I would see no performance increase from these components as the memory in my current system is PC-3200 DDR400. Also, when I perform memory bandwitdh tests using SiSoft Sandra, memory in this configuration compares at half the capacity of the memory I am using now.

2. Is there any sense buying DDR500, 533 or 550 if no motherboards support speeds this fast? I would assume you would be able to heavily overclock on a DDR400 mobo but wouldn't that place a lot of strain on the motherboard and also require an overclock of the whole FSB?

3. For modern gaming 1GB of RAM seems to be necessary. Is it worth dropping in another 512-1024MB in addition? IL-2 Pacific Fighters for instance, uses all of my available RAM (about 700MB after using RAM Turbo to free as much as possible) and still swaps out to my HD causing stutters.

4. I'm still looking for an article that explains how AMD processors compare to Intel processors given their lower clock speeds. Anyone know where I can find a relatively unbiased one ;)?
 

quizzelsnatch

Senior member
Nov 12, 2004
860
0
0
1. AMD depends more on latency than bandwidth, maybe(?). It wouldn't matter if your ram is faster or slower.
2. That RAM is only good if you are going to overclock your computer because it offers a guarenteed memory overclock because the ram is rated up to that speed, your motherboard SHOULD support it, just maybe not up to those speeds, it'll automatically downclock it to DDR400.
3. I would get 512 sticks, 1024s are much more expensive and don't overclock nearly as well as 512s.
4. AMD performs better because it does more work per cycle so the clockspeed doesn't need to be as high as intel's. Also, the on-die memory controller on the athlon64 improves performance a lot because there is much less latency.

If i'm wrong on any of this please correct me...
 

AJeightFive

Member
Dec 10, 2004
34
0
0
Thanks, so 2x 512MB (2GB total) matched pairs would be significantly advantageous over a single 512MB matched pair (1GB total) or will the difference be negligible until games become more demanding?
 

TheGreenGoblin

Senior member
Jan 3, 2001
216
0
0
Originally posted by: AJeightFive
There are still a couple of unanswered questions that I would like to address before I start making purchases.

4. I'm still looking for an article that explains how AMD processors compare to Intel processors given their lower clock speeds. Anyone know where I can find a relatively unbiased one ;)?

Anandtech has quite a few reviews. If you can afford a 3rd stick of 512 , go for it , but there aren't many apps or games that will make use of that extra 512. At least not apps used by the common home pc user.

I'd go for a socket 939 motherboard and a 3000+ or 3200+. If you do some research , you'll see that that to it's pretty much unanimous , AMD has been the platform of choice for any knowledgeable enthusiast. More bang for your buck , less heat , more future proof if you go 939.

The 925/915 route gets you an overpriced system that doesn't perform significantly better than the 865 systems and 865/875 is a dead end platform at this point with little or no future cpu upgrades available in the future , depending what cpu you buy.

 

AJeightFive

Member
Dec 10, 2004
34
0
0
After your recommendations and a little research into the AMD products I've devided to go with the AMD Athlon 64 3200+ S939 for my upgraded system. Can someone confirm that the item listed http://www.ncix.com/products/i...OX&manufacture=AMD]here[/url] is the 90nm chip. I still intend to purchase either the AGP 8x 256MB eVGA or Gigabyte GeForce 6800 GT video card. The one I choose will likely depend on which is cheaper when I go to hit the checkout button unless anyone has any recommendations for or against either of these cards.

My biggest problem now is finding a mother board / memory combination. There don't seem to be many choices for S939 mobo's and I havn't been able to find ANY that support 4x dual channel DIMMs at DDR400 which would allow me to upgrade to 2GB DDR400 down the line. I'm going to keep looking through the motherboards forum but if anyone can point out any obvious choices I'd be grateful. Right now I'm looking at http://www.ncix.com/products/i...p;manufacture=Kingston]Kingston HyperX PC-3200 (2-2-2-5 @ DDR400)[/url] for $361 Canadian at NCIX.

Lastly, after I upgrade will I need to reinstall windows or can I swap out the old parts without altering anything on my hard disks?
 

ts3433

Platinum Member
Jun 29, 2004
2,731
0
0
All S939 3200+ chips are 90nm. ATM it's only the two 3500+ chips that overlap on the same socket.

If not overclocking, you don't need HyperX or any kind of CL2 RAM, really; Corsair or Mushkin value CL2.5 RAM is fine.
 

AJeightFive

Member
Dec 10, 2004
34
0
0
Thanks for the info RE the 90nm chips. I'll be over clocking this rig at somepoint I'm sure, and I have the money to invest in good RAM. With this in mind, would you recommend the HyperX memory?
 

ts3433

Platinum Member
Jun 29, 2004
2,731
0
0
I'm not sure what chips the HyperX uses, but some CL2 Patriot RAM like in jpeyton's guide should be great for OCing, as they use TCCD chips and often hit 260 MHz.