- Oct 4, 2006
- 2,779
- 1
- 81
What exactly is the point of the start menu? I only ever used it in Windows 7 to do a search, otherwise I never touched it. In Windows 8 it seems even more useless. What would you use it for? I'm curious.
A million things. Is that even a serious question?
The search bar/launcher is very important for power users. You can run services - "services.msc", command line "cmd" and startup items "msconfig" from there easily.
If you want to get into your computer and you're a fast typer, for example, it's often quicker to just tap Win Key and type C: than actually find and click on the icons.
-Easy way to get into Computer/Documents/Control Panel/Printers/Pictures & Music
-Location of all of your installed programs - not all of us want every single program/app/game installed to be displayed on the start menu bar, and tapping the start button is a super quick way to get into it.
The start menu is super useful and one of the best features of Windows. Maybe the Windows 8 inteface is handy for touchscreens, but for keyboard and mice users, the Start menu is faster.
A lot of us don't want icons all over our desktops for no real reason.
The start menu was one of MS's best OS design decisions. There's a reason it's been copied/emulated by just about everyone. It's compact, (if you don't need it, it's not in your way) yet can quickly drill down to access many apps/settings/etc. using the least amount of screen real estate. There was no reason to get rid of it. The start screen is pretty much the opposite- the absolute most amount of wasted screen real estate, and one of MS's worst OS design decisions.
for me its faster to access my Download folder and videos from there rather than going to Explorer, then navigate to that folder from thereWhat exactly is the point of the start menu? I only ever used it in Windows 7 to do a search, otherwise I never touched it. In Windows 8 it seems even more useless. What would you use it for? I'm curious.
A lot of us don't want icons all over our desktops for no real reason.
The start menu was one of MS's best OS design decisions. There's a reason it's been copied/emulated by just about everyone. It's compact, (if you don't need it, it's not in your way) yet can quickly drill down to access many apps/settings/etc. using the least amount of screen real estate. There was no reason to get rid of it. The start screen is pretty much the opposite- the absolute most amount of wasted screen real estate, and one of MS's worst OS design decisions.
But you can do all that anyway. Right click on the bottom left in Win 8.1 and you have all the admin options.
Plus I pin all my apps to the taskbar which is what Windows is designed for.
That's what pinning apps to the taskbar is for. Otherwise your taskbar is just sitting there wasting space.
This is what I do. I have everything I need within here.
![]()
The start menu is some retro throwback to Windows 95 if you ask me. Glad it's gone.
But you can do all that anyway. Right click on the bottom left in Win 8.1 and you have all the admin options.
Plus I pin all my apps to the taskbar which is what Windows is designed for.
That's what pinning apps to the taskbar is for. Otherwise your taskbar is just sitting there wasting space.
The start menu is some retro throwback to Windows 95 if you ask me. Glad it's gone.
I have to be on the side of the start menu too for reasons already pointed out. One big thing that I got used to is the search box. One key (winkey) and I can easily search for a program or file.
With 8 its now a 2-3 button/movement function. which makes it not as quick to get to stuff. plus the search is separate between the 3 items, programs, doc, settings, which they fixed in 8.1 and I am going to give 8.1 another go. But if it cant adjust, a start menu is coming back
Mem -- Nice background, where did you get it, I may steal it![]()
I disagree. However, I probably use pinning in a different way than you do. I use pinning for the programs that I run every single time I turn on my computer. For home it's Task Manager, foobar, chrome, and firefox, and windows explorer for example, at work it's the same plus sourcesafe, SQL Management Studio, and Visual Studio. I run these programs all the time, as long as my computer is on, those programs will be running sonner or later. Pinning them to taskbar is a quick way to launch those programs and have them in a consistent orderly manner every time I launch them. To me it's not a space waster, it's a time saver.pinning is yet another horrible design decision in my opinion.
pinned items take up a big chunk of the taskbar and look much the same as open program... making one unnecessarily focus to determine if it is an open and running program or just a hotlink to a closed program.
Ironic, because as said, yours is the epitome of wasted space. All the Win 8 taskbar is is a weak imitation of the original, with function removed for only ONE purpose- to force people to use the crappy start screen.That's what pinning apps to the taskbar is for. Otherwise your taskbar is just sitting there wasting space.
Ironic, because as said, yours is the epitome of wasted space. All the Win 8 taskbar is is a weak imitation of the original, with function removed for only ONE purpose- to force people to use the crappy start screen.
Mem, you keep reposting the same screen shots, but it's nothing special. The first is just the weak taskbar that's like a pale imitation of the original, and that start screen- ugh. An abomination of poor design. It's the absolute least amount of useful information presented in the most wasteful amount of space. Different sized tiles, with that horrible mix of flat candy-colors and then mismatching icons, all that random ill-fitting sizes- sorry, but what a mess. What you like about it is that it's different, but different doesn't mean "better". It's not a better solution, and to someone who actually needs organization and doesn't want their workflow interrupted by a screen full of mess, it's the opposite of better- it's much worse.
You keep repeating how you've adapted like that's some badge of honor, but I'll keep reminding you, it's along the same lines as my grandma "adapting" to all the spyware ads she clicks on that then pop up all sorts of nonsense on her computer. Can she adapt to the big flashing ad that's now on her screen and go on using her computer in a way that suits her? Sure. Is that the most logical and intelligent way to use a computer- especially for someone who knows better? No.
Just because something comes along and changes your computer to someone else's vision of how it should be- shovelware from some PC maker, spyware, or some garbage from MS itself, and you get used to it, doesn't mean it has a thing to do with being better UI design, it just means some people will use whatever comes along without questioning it.
that is a pure example of wasted space! I mean you have VLC on the taskbar? seriously? why would anyone need that? usually your video player has the association to open all video files so if you double click on a video file it will open with VLC! see the point? you are just pinning programs like that randomly to have a colorful useless taskbar! and what happens when you open so many programs? you will have no more taskbar space that it will look all crumped and probably will show you a DOWN ARROW to access more
Ironic, because as said, yours is the epitome of wasted space. All the Win 8 taskbar is is a weak imitation of the original, with function removed for only ONE purpose- to force people to use the crappy start screen.
Mem, you keep reposting the same screen shots, but it's nothing special. The first is just the weak taskbar that's like a pale imitation of the original, and that start screen- ugh. An abomination of poor design. It's the absolute least amount of useful information presented in the most wasteful amount of space. Different sized tiles, with that horrible mix of flat candy-colors and then mismatching icons, all that random ill-fitting sizes- sorry, but what a mess. What you like about it is that it's different, but different doesn't mean "better". It's not a better solution, and to someone who actually needs organization and doesn't want their workflow interrupted by a screen full of mess, it's the opposite of better- it's much worse.
You keep repeating how you've adapted like that's some badge of honor, but I'll keep reminding you, it's along the same lines as my grandma "adapting" to all the spyware ads she clicks on that then pop up all sorts of nonsense on her computer. Can she adapt to the big flashing ad that's now on her screen and go on using her computer in a way that suits her? Sure. Is that the most logical and intelligent way to use a computer- especially for someone who knows better? No.
Just because something comes along and changes your computer to someone else's vision of how it should be- shovelware from some PC maker, spyware, or some garbage from MS itself, and you get used to it, doesn't mean it has a thing to do with being better UI design, it just means some people will use whatever comes along without questioning it.
a proper start menu.
That lousy menu you have open trying to say it's the same function as the original start menu just proves you're trying to pretend its the same thing.