My Site for GPU Driver Comparisons

taltamir

Lifer
Mar 21, 2004
13,576
6
76
nice, a few recommendations...
1. Replace R with Are and U with You.
2. Change it from "this thread" to "this site", it is not a thread anymore.
 

wolf2009

Golden Member
Feb 12, 2008
1,000
0
76
Originally posted by: taltamir
nice, a few recommendations...
1. Replace R with Are and U with You.
2. Change it from "this thread" to "this site", it is not a thread anymore.
thx a lot for ur suggestion
 

wolf2009

Golden Member
Feb 12, 2008
1,000
0
76
Originally posted by: taltamir
nice, a few recommendations...
1. Replace R with Are and U with You.
2. Change it from "this thread" to "this site", it is not a thread anymore.
alrite , done .
 

Magusigne

Golden Member
Nov 21, 2007
1,550
0
71
Originally posted by: wolf2009
Originally posted by: taltamir
nice, a few recommendations...
1. Replace R with Are and U with You.
2. Change it from "this thread" to "this site", it is not a thread anymore.
alrite , done .
Its very well done.

My suggestion (maybe I'm picky) is just to have someone clean up the grammar a little. As far as Capitalizing things etc. But a great idea and very nice charts!
 

yacoub

Golden Member
May 24, 2005
1,989
14
81
your test system specs for the NVidia lists an ATI card. also, yeah, the grammar issues. But otherwise thanks, this is helpful!
 

bob4432

Lifer
Sep 6, 2003
11,674
21
81
i just thought there would be a much larger difference between the 4850 and 3850. here are my results w/ 3GB ram, e2160 @ 3GB on 32bix xp w/ catalyst 8.6 @ 1280x1024:

crysis:
2AA:
min fps - 15.66
max fps - 28.66
avg fps - 22.8

4AA:
min fps - 15.75
max fps - 29.37
avg fps - 24.935

w/ a bit more tinkering and 4AA:
min fps - 15.79
max fps - 29.56
avg fps - 25.205

maybe it is because the resolution but i thought the 4850 would have really beaten the 3850.

company of heroes #s - set to max and 4AA:
min fps - 11.9
max fps - 63
avg fps - 58.1

looks like you 4850 is resolution restricted :thumbsup:
 

wolf2009

Golden Member
Feb 12, 2008
1,000
0
76
Originally posted by: bob4432
i just thought there would be a much larger difference between the 4850 and 3850. here are my results w/ 3GB ram, e2160 @ 3GB on 32bix xp w/ catalyst 8.6 @ 1280x1024:

crysis:
2AA:
min fps - 15.66
max fps - 28.66
avg fps - 22.8

4AA:
min fps - 15.75
max fps - 29.37
avg fps - 24.935

w/ a bit more tinkering and 4AA:
min fps - 15.79
max fps - 29.56
avg fps - 25.205

maybe it is because the resolution but i thought the 4850 would have really beaten the 3850.

company of heroes #s - set to max and 4AA:
min fps - 11.9
max fps - 63
avg fps - 58.1

looks like you 4850 is resolution restricted :thumbsup:
something doesn't seem right with the crysis results , how r they so high with 4xAA on a HD3850, which had AA problems , u have everything on High right and very high ?
 

bob4432

Lifer
Sep 6, 2003
11,674
21
81
i don't know what it is but i have run the benchmark from within the demo and a friend let me borrow his full version, so it is v1.21 and i get the same results from within the game - ea's little .bat file and that tool i posted a link to. i have benchmarked at least 50x stressing my card since it is new, one to make sure my gpu o/c is ok (770/998). yes, all settings to high w/ 4AA. i don't have a very high option (maybe because i am dx9 and not 10?). i am using the most current distro of dx9c - the june distro, so maybe that helps?

here is another benchmark i just ran -

7/16/2008 2:55:47 PM - XP
Beginning Run #1 on Map-island, Demo-benchmark_gpu
DX9 1280x1024, AA=4x, Vsync=Disabled, 32 bit test, FullScreen
Demo Loops=3, Time Of Day= 9
Global Game Quality: High
==============================================================
TimeDemo Play Started , (Total Frames: 2000, Recorded Time: 111.86s)
!TimeDemo Run 0 Finished.
Play Time: 85.75s, Average FPS: 23.32
Min FPS: 17.29 at frame 137, Max FPS: 29.19 at frame 987
Average Tri/Sec: 23738556, Tri/Frame: 1017797
Recorded/Played Tris ratio: 0.90
!TimeDemo Run 1 Finished.
Play Time: 79.44s, Average FPS: 25.18
Min FPS: 17.29 at frame 137, Max FPS: 29.51 at frame 992
Average Tri/Sec: 25871316, Tri/Frame: 1027558
Recorded/Played Tris ratio: 0.89
!TimeDemo Run 2 Finished.
Play Time: 79.35s, Average FPS: 25.21
Min FPS: 17.29 at frame 137, Max FPS: 29.65 at frame 994
Average Tri/Sec: 25928532, Tri/Frame: 1028694
Recorded/Played Tris ratio: 0.89
TimeDemo Play Ended, (3 Runs Performed)
==============================================================

Completed All Tests

<><><><><><><><><><><><><>>--SUMMARY--<<><><><><><><><><><><><><>

7/16/2008 2:55:47 PM - XP

Run #1- DX9 1280x1024 AA=4x, 32 bit test, Quality: High ~~ Overall Average FPS: 25.195
 

dakels

Platinum Member
Nov 20, 2002
2,809
2
0
Originally posted by: wolf2009
I have a site here where i have compared different drivers from nvidia and ATI and their performance in games .

GO here : http://hardwarebenchmark.googlepages.com

If u guys like the work, could u plz leave ur thx by clicking the google ads and help support my effort, to go to college and buy new hardware .
Thanks! Very nice. I clicked on all your links.

If I can make a suggestion. I would write a little more about what those graphs mean. I sentence or 2 describing what each figure means can go a long way into making this more palatable to the general audience. If you notice in most reviews, they try to be as descriptive as possible and state the variables.

Also the charts could be consistant. The Nvidia graph and ATI graph the data differently from each driver to FPS min, avg, max. You may want to stick with one format for both.

Anyways, thanks for the benchies.
 

CKent

Diamond Member
Aug 17, 2005
9,020
0
0
I'd check it out, but I don't speak your language.

Nothing ethnocentric here, but this is primarily an English-speaking forum, and you should abide by that unwritten rule when making posts.
 

wolf2009

Golden Member
Feb 12, 2008
1,000
0
76
Originally posted by: CKent
I'd check it out, but I don't speak your language.

Nothing ethnocentric here, but this is primarily an English-speaking forum, and you should abide by that unwritten rule when making posts.
i'll clean it up
 

wolf2009

Golden Member
Feb 12, 2008
1,000
0
76
with 2 AA my avg fps is 33, while yours is 28 . also i got vista and you have xp . your cpu is at 3ghz while mine is at 2.6 ghz . 5 fps in crysis is a big deal. So that may be it .
 

User5

Senior member
Jul 24, 2004
215
0
0
this site is using 8.6 drivers.. i found the 8.7 drivers gave a performance increase all around.
 

bob4432

Lifer
Sep 6, 2003
11,674
21
81
Originally posted by: User5
this site is using 8.6 drivers.. i found the 8.7 drivers gave a performance increase all around.
the official 8.7s came out today....maybe give him a bit of time to put up those results. your post makes it sound like he is giving out slow/old info...
 

ASK THE COMMUNITY

TRENDING THREADS