My list of words/phrases that, when said, indicate the author is being

Page 3 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.

mugs

Lifer
Apr 29, 2003
48,920
46
91
Originally posted by: seemingly random
Originally posted by: mugs
Originally posted by: seemingly random
Originally posted by: mugs
Originally posted by: brxndxn
Any 'news' article that says "Some people" in it.. usually when talking about random 'outrage' over comments that could be taken racists or sexist if attempting to connect dots that don't exist.

... I'm not sure you know what pretentious and patronizing mean. I think the word you're thinking of is presumptive.
Good job at being informative and not condescending.

I would have tried not to be condescending, but it's really annoying when people try to politicize threads. :)
See: JS80

Also, I would have preferred to use the Princess Bride quote, but it didn't fit in context. ;)
I'd rather not.

This one? "Inconceivable. You keep saying that word. I do not think it means what you think it means.?

That would be the one
 

brxndxn

Diamond Member
Apr 3, 2001
8,475
0
76
Originally posted by: mugs
Originally posted by: seemingly random
Originally posted by: mugs
Originally posted by: seemingly random
Originally posted by: mugs
Originally posted by: brxndxn
Any 'news' article that says "Some people" in it.. usually when talking about random 'outrage' over comments that could be taken racists or sexist if attempting to connect dots that don't exist.

... I'm not sure you know what pretentious and patronizing mean. I think the word you're thinking of is presumptive.
Good job at being informative and not condescending.

I would have tried not to be condescending, but it's really annoying when people try to politicize threads. :)
See: JS80

Also, I would have preferred to use the Princess Bride quote, but it didn't fit in context. ;)
I'd rather not.

This one? "Inconceivable. You keep saying that word. I do not think it means what you think it means.?

That would be the one

mugs.. While also presumptious, it is definitely pretentious to indicate 'outrage' that neither exists nor is important. The fact the news assumes outrage... presumptious.. The fact the news reports it.. pretentious.

You were patronizing. Therefore, this thread is recursive. The first step to understanding recursion is to understand recursion.

Also, how is this political? I mean.. I should be able to point out that our media is awful without being political, right?

 

sdifox

No Lifer
Sep 30, 2005
100,760
18,046
126
Originally posted by: clamum
Not really pretentious much, but I fucking hate "whilst". Use "while" you fucker.

Whilst "while" is the preferred form in North America, that is not true for those of us whom were learnt the Queen's English.
 

Perknose

Forum Director & Omnipotent Overlord
Forum Director
Oct 9, 1999
46,894
10,720
147
Let's not lose sight of the fact that employing certain words and phrases whilst posting is not necessarily emblematic of pretension qua pretense, but rather speaks to the very core of eschewing obfuscation through assiduous exactitude, a pursuit which lends a certain "je ne sais quoi" air to one's utterances even as it has the almost inescapable secondary and even tertiary ramifications of arousing the ire, nay, the dander and high dudgeon of the responding exemplars of the lumpenproletariat and other such (sniff) ilk.

I hold that to claim otherwise is, with all due respect, patently preposterous and leaves one poised on the precipice of arrant tomfoolery.
 

Ruptga

Lifer
Aug 3, 2006
10,246
207
106
Why is it that whenever someone really says "with all due respect" what they really mean is kiss my ass?
 

seemingly random

Diamond Member
Oct 10, 2007
5,277
0
0
Originally posted by: brxndxn
Originally posted by: mugs
Originally posted by: seemingly random
Originally posted by: mugs
Originally posted by: seemingly random
Originally posted by: mugs
Originally posted by: brxndxn
Any 'news' article that says "Some people" in it.. usually when talking about random 'outrage' over comments that could be taken racists or sexist if attempting to connect dots that don't exist.

... I'm not sure you know what pretentious and patronizing mean. I think the word you're thinking of is presumptive.
Good job at being informative and not condescending.

I would have tried not to be condescending, but it's really annoying when people try to politicize threads. :)
See: JS80

Also, I would have preferred to use the Princess Bride quote, but it didn't fit in context. ;)
I'd rather not.

This one? "Inconceivable. You keep saying that word. I do not think it means what you think it means.?

That would be the one

mugs.. While also presumptious, it is definitely pretentious to indicate 'outrage' that neither exists nor is important. The fact the news assumes outrage... presumptious.. The fact the news reports it.. pretentious.

You were patronizing. Therefore, this thread is recursive. The first step to understanding recursion is to understand recursion.

Also, how is this political? I mean.. I should be able to point out that our media is awful without being political, right?
That is patently preposterous.

---

And btw, the news manufactures outrage many times where none would have existed.
 

Jeff7

Lifer
Jan 4, 2001
41,596
20
81
Business speak. Management speak.
"blah blah company moves forward."

Right. That's pretty much the goal of working and having a company. Progress. No need to say the same thing every single week.

 

seemingly random

Diamond Member
Oct 10, 2007
5,277
0
0
Originally posted by: Perknose
Let's not lose sight of the fact that employing certain words and phrases whilst posting is not necessarily emblematic of pretension qua pretense.
But it's in the proximity of a perfect predictor.
 

Perknose

Forum Director & Omnipotent Overlord
Forum Director
Oct 9, 1999
46,894
10,720
147
Originally posted by: seemingly random
Originally posted by: Perknose
Let's not lose sight of the fact that employing certain words and phrases whilst posting is not necessarily emblematic of pretension qua pretense.
But it's in the proximity of a perfect predictor.

Good sir, please permit me the piquant pose of pausing to parse your non-prolix prose, which perhaps presents and presumes a path packed with a plenitude of perplexing proposals to pursue, a path whose purposeful preconditions are best perambulated parsimoniously, per se.
 

Perknose

Forum Director & Omnipotent Overlord
Forum Director
Oct 9, 1999
46,894
10,720
147
Originally posted by: seemingly random
In the interests of national security ...

Going forward, I visualize keeping our customer driven, results oriented approach out of the box and yet in symbiotic close proximity to the top down, structured interests of national security, a best in breed branded approach which, I dare say, is the sine qua non of blue sky strategery.

Now if you'll all please open your binders to page 37a . . .
 

seemingly random

Diamond Member
Oct 10, 2007
5,277
0
0
Originally posted by: Perknose
Originally posted by: seemingly random
In the interests of national security ...

Going forward, I visualize keeping our customer driven, results oriented approach out of the box and yet in symbiotic close proximity to the top down, structured interests of national security, a best in breed branded approach which, I dare say, is the sine qua non of blue sky strategery.

Now if you'll all please open your binders to page 37a . . .
Ok, I'm sold. Where do I sign? btw, what am I buying?
 

seemingly random

Diamond Member
Oct 10, 2007
5,277
0
0
Originally posted by: Perknose
Originally posted by: seemingly random
Originally posted by: Perknose
Let's not lose sight of the fact that employing certain words and phrases whilst posting is not necessarily emblematic of pretension qua pretense.
But it's in the proximity of a perfect predictor.

Good sir, please permit me the piquant pose of pausing to parse your non-prolix prose, which perhaps presents and presumes a path packed with a plenitude of perplexing proposals to pursue, a path whose purposeful preconditions are best perambulated parsimoniously, per se.
I'm in a pickle positing a response. Perhaps, a pause for neuron reconstruction is permitted.
 

Perknose

Forum Director & Omnipotent Overlord
Forum Director
Oct 9, 1999
46,894
10,720
147
Originally posted by: seemingly random
Originally posted by: Perknose
Originally posted by: seemingly random
In the interests of national security ...

Going forward, I visualize keeping our customer driven, results oriented approach out of the box and yet in symbiotic close proximity to the top down, structured interests of national security, a best in breed branded approach which, I dare say, is the sine qua non of blue sky strategery.

Now if you'll all please open your binders to page 37a . . .
Ok, I'm sold. Where do I sign? btw, what am I buying?

The dynamic synergy of a ground breaking, forward looking approach.

Sign here.

Aaaaand here. And here and here and here.

Now take off your pants, we own them.
 

Perknose

Forum Director & Omnipotent Overlord
Forum Director
Oct 9, 1999
46,894
10,720
147
Originally posted by: seemingly random
Originally posted by: Perknose
Originally posted by: seemingly random
Originally posted by: Perknose
Let's not lose sight of the fact that employing certain words and phrases whilst posting is not necessarily emblematic of pretension qua pretense.
But it's in the proximity of a perfect predictor.

Good sir, please permit me the piquant pose of pausing to parse your non-prolix prose, which perhaps presents and presumes a path packed with a plenitude of perplexing proposals to pursue, a path whose purposeful preconditions are best perambulated parsimoniously, per se.
I'm in a pickle positing a response. Perhaps, a pause for neuron reconstruction is permitted.

I've always suspected you were a bit neuronic.
 

seemingly random

Diamond Member
Oct 10, 2007
5,277
0
0
Originally posted by: Perknose
Originally posted by: seemingly random
Originally posted by: Perknose
Originally posted by: seemingly random
In the interests of national security ...

Going forward, I visualize keeping our customer driven, results oriented approach out of the box and yet in symbiotic close proximity to the top down, structured interests of national security, a best in breed branded approach which, I dare say, is the sine qua non of blue sky strategery.

Now if you'll all please open your binders to page 37a . . .
Ok, I'm sold. Where do I sign? btw, what am I buying?

The dynamic synergy of a ground breaking, forward looking approach.

Sign here.

Aaaaand here. And here and here and here.

Now take off your pants, we own them.
Sounds like the shit that enron was selling. If left alone, maybe they could have developed a method for splitting a synergy - thereby creating an antergy, if you will. Then the genius marketers could have come up with a juxtaposed antergies product - a parallel synergy for the cognoscenti. There would have been several position papers attempting to debunk the claims that they were just separating and recombining the same old shit.
 

aplefka

Lifer
Feb 29, 2004
12,014
2
0
Originally posted by: alyarb
Originally posted by: breakit23
Originally posted by: swbsam
Originally posted by: CoinOperatedBoy
Maybe you just don't like that pang of social responsibility when poor people and foreigners make you realize they aren't as well off as you are. If only they would dress, speak, and act like you, we could just pretend they're one of us.

Honestly, I'm as liberal as they come. I don't feel that anyone has a responsibility to speak a certain way BUT, if they want to earn my respect, they should at least attempt to learn the language. My parents are immigrants and my dad still has a very strong accent - I could never, ever call him lazy. But I see the children of immigrants still speak with an accent, and it makes me sad.


That is possibly one of the most ignorant things I've ever heard. It makes you sad because people speak with an accent? Besides accents from non-US countries, America itself has an absurb amount of accents by region. Immigrant parents will speak to their kids in accents and they just pick it up especially if they learned another language at a young age. What do you want? Everyone to sound just like you. I hope one day you will learn accceptance. I find it deeply embarrasing that you need to nitpick at accents when you're actually the problem with humanity.

you've seemed to have entered that discussion without any obvious effort to spell correctly even when firefox is likely to remind you how to spell second-grader words like "absurd," "embarrassing," and "acceptance." meanwhile, swbsam's whole argument is that he would merely like to see some obvious effort in communication, primarily for the accomodation of the listener, and he was likely to have been referring to all speakers of language everywhere, and I agree with him. his anecdotal reference was only for support and it was based on his own life, which clearly struck a sensitive nerve with you because you're probably cynical about something here that you lack. way to go.

you can observe that some hispanics know how to pronounce our vowels properly and have likewise assimilated a hell of a lot more of our culture than people who sit at home and watch the spanish channel all day with the abuela they smuggled in. these are the people who are likely to say "gee, would you like to be my girlfriend?" rather than just being cool (scarce experience with assimilated individuals means they don't now what "cool" is in this country). these are the people likely to say "bueno" rather than "sup?" when they pick up the goddamn telefono even when they see my, a white person's number, calling. do these outliers expect that they can keep up the monolithic status of their culture even when they've desperately emigrated here, where the culture is different, for the business opportunities? how do they expect to do business if they don't like how we do it?

and maybe this is just orlando, but legacy hispanics drive 10mph under the limit and assimilated ones drive 10 mph over. there is a difference, swbsam just didn't spell it out in braille for you with an upside down braille question mark at the beginning, so you missed it.

the great thing about america is that kids don't learn a goddamn thing from their families/parents. they learn it all from their friends at public school. how to speak, how to be cool, and how to make fun of the lesser mortals and stick up for themselves when compromised, and how to find good porn so that they learn how to be good sex partners, ad infinitum.

did anyone get that L&R reference? funny thread. also, the "ad infinitum" is my actual contribution here. i don't hate all latin phrases, only "ad infinitum" and "ad nauseam."

and i do not mean to speak against a wonderful idea like tolerance, because tolerance is the cornerstone of diplomacy and the duty of the superior. but if you are the subordinate in a given scenario, it would be wise to try to not be a fuckup.

+1

I tried to explain this to someone who was second or third generation Mexican living here in SoCal and she got super offended.

The fact of the matter is that America doesn't have a culture anymore because we've become so concerned with being politically correct and accepting that it's "racist" or "ignorant" to expect someone who has moved here from another country to do something like learn to speak English. Fuck that. This is America. Europeans get pissed when we go over there and expect their culture to accommodate us, and rightfully so, yet we don't look at them as racist, do we? It's some weird double standard yet I don't see how it's any different.

If anything, it's more justified than getting upset with vacationers in Europe. If your plan is to LIVE here, then when dealing with those from here you should speak the way they do. It's fine if you want to still celebrate your other country's culture, but recognize that it wasn't so great to stop you from coming here.

I can't provide anything to the OP. I use big words occasionally in everyday conversation. I'm sure I sound pretentious sometimes, even when I don't. To be honest, I don't care. Either I'm talking to someone who already knows me or the person isn't worth getting to know if they don't like me for how I speak.
 

breakit23

Golden Member
Oct 9, 1999
1,741
0
0
Originally posted by: alyarb
Originally posted by: breakit23
Originally posted by: alyarb
Originally posted by: breakit23
Originally posted by: swbsam
Originally posted by: CoinOperatedBoy
Maybe you just don't like that pang of social responsibility when poor people and foreigners make you realize they aren't as well off as you are. If only they would dress, speak, and act like you, we could just pretend they're one of us.

Honestly, I'm as liberal as they come. I don't feel that anyone has a responsibility to speak a certain way BUT, if they want to earn my respect, they should at least attempt to learn the language. My parents are immigrants and my dad still has a very strong accent - I could never, ever call him lazy. But I see the children of immigrants still speak with an accent, and it makes me sad.


That is possibly one of the most ignorant things I've ever heard. It makes you sad because people speak with an accent? Besides accents from non-US countries, America itself has an absurb amount of accents by region. Immigrant parents will speak to their kids in accents and they just pick it up especially if they learned another language at a young age. What do you want? Everyone to sound just like you. I hope one day you will learn accceptance. I find it deeply embarrasing that you need to nitpick at accents when you're actually the problem with humanity.

you've seemed to have entered that discussion without any obvious effort to spell correctly even when firefox is likely to remind you how to spell second-grader words like "absurd," "embarrassing," and "acceptance." meanwhile, swbsam's whole argument is that he would merely like to see some obvious effort in communication, primarily for the accomodation of the listener, and he was likely to have been referring to all speakers of language everywhere, and I agree with him. his anecdotal reference was only for support and it was based on his own life, which clearly struck a sensitive nerve with you because you're probably cynical about something here that you lack. way to go.

you can observe that some hispanics know how to pronounce our vowels properly and have likewise assimilated a hell of a lot more of our culture than people who sit at home and watch the spanish channel all day with the abuela they smuggled in. these are the people who are likely to say "gee, would you like to be my girlfriend?" rather than just being cool (scarce experience with assimilated individuals means they don't now what "cool" is in this country). these are the people likely to say "bueno" rather than "sup?" when they pick up the goddamn telefono even when they see my, a white person's number, calling. do these outliers expect that they can keep up the monolithic status of their culture even when they've desperately emigrated here, where the culture is different, for the business opportunities? how do they expect to do business if they don't like how we do it?

and maybe this is just orlando, but legacy hispanics drive 10mph under the limit and assimilated ones drive 10 mph over. there is a difference, swbsam just didn't spell it out in braille for you with an upside down braille question mark at the beginning, so you missed it.

the great thing about america is that kids don't learn a goddamn thing from their families/parents. they learn it all from their friends at public school. how to speak, how to be cool, and how to make fun of the lesser mortals and stick up for themselves when compromised, and how to find good porn so that they learn how to be good sex partners, ad infinitum.

did anyone get that L&R reference? funny thread. also, the "ad infinitum" is my actual contribution here. i don't hate all latin phrases, only "ad infinitum" and "ad nauseam."

and i do not mean to speak against a wonderful idea like tolerance, because tolerance is the cornerstone of diplomacy and the duty of the superior. but if you are the subordinate in a given scenario, it would be wise to try to not be a fuckup.


I'm not using firefox this is a mobile browser. Is that alright for you or should I only use the internet with browsers and a computer that is to your liking? Was the paragraph that difficult to understand because I spelt three words wrong? How the fuck are you even criticizing my spelling when you can?t even capitalize or understand basic sentence structure. This makes understanding writing far more difficult, which I am not nitpicking against because even though your grammar was equally terrible it is still understandable.

No one needs to assimilate people come to the US to live they want to. That has always been the beauty of my country. It's not up to you to decide. There are Americans of all backgrounds that sit home and watch drivel. And how am I lacking because I defend the rights of others? I live in the New York and I find a southern and Boston accent very difficult to understand. So what does that mean should they change the way they speak for my liking? Do you understand the implications of what you are saying? These are the origins of illiberality and prejudice. It baffles me that you are even arguing this. I'm assuming you were born here and somewhere down the line you're family immigrated here. Unless they were one of the lucky few I'm sure they were persecuted again. Have you no sympathy? Also please explain, what is a white person?s number?

You are either an unintelligible individual or a provocative genius. Your spelling, composition, syntax and word choice are all atrocious and would not pass 5th grade in my home district. It's so bad that I think you're doing it on purpose now, because your other post was much more masterfully formed (actually, that is being too generous, but the number of run-on sentences just went through the roof. take it slow and do it right. capitalization on the internet is stylistic; sentence punctuation is temporal protocol.), it just happened to not be free of errors. But this? I'm speechless. Plus the your/you're conflict. You know that is every white man's pet peeve. I should send you some empanadas with a crucifix unless there's something else you like better.

A white person's number is a telephone number that, when called, summons a white person to answer the ringing phone. Whenever my number is dialed, a white person answers it. When someone says, "give me your number," or "I've got your number," what do you think it means? Social security? VIN number? Bank routing number? It doesn't exactly take a cipher master to decrypt what I was saying there. Context was crystal clear, amigo. Did you even try? Because I think that is where we differ. Do you try? Were you trying to not fuck up earlier? What's the deal here?

Did you even fucking read your original response? It reads like an idiot wrote it. I'll quote you if it makes you feel better "Your spelling (this you pass), composition, syntax and word choice are all atrocious and would not pass 5th grade in my home district." What style and syntax? Just by calling you out on it you completely altered your so called "style'. It?s unbelievably pathetic that all it took was me to point out your errors to make you completely change it. I can even imagine you pouring over each word cowering in fear of making another error. Do you not even realize we are typing out a verbal exchange where you choose to read and respond to the question that are too your liking? But in the end you will alter your ways and I and everyone else won?t. You can send me all the empanadas and crosses you want but I?m neither Hispanic nor Christian ?bro?.


Here is your context:
?these are the people likely to say "bueno" rather than "sup?" when they pick up the goddamn telefono even when they see my, a white person's number, calling.?

Bueno means good, how does that even equate to sup? Now I know you?re not as retarded as you seem but please show me how they are asking for your number dumbass. Their businesses must be doing fucking fine if you?re still calling them. Most American companies outsource phone support anyway.

Is this even going anywhere? You?ve ceased arguing about the original issue and only answer ?what is a white person?s number?? I can only conclude that you have given up due to failure.
 

Sea Moose

Diamond Member
May 12, 2009
6,933
7
76
Originally posted by: James Bond
In general, I hate it when people say, "like I said", or, "again".

That bugs me more in real life or over the phone than in print, though.

People say that to repeat a point that you ignored. I use it on my boss all the time.

I said a a job would take 8hours to 10 hours. He said it would take 4. He ordered the parts, i did the job, it took me 8 hours.

He says "Why did it take you 8 hours"
i said "Like i said, it would take 8 hours and it took 8 hours....... fucker"
 

JJChicken

Diamond Member
Apr 9, 2007
6,165
16
81
Originally posted by: breakit23
Yea yea and when they say because instead of jus cus' !!! Whats the deal, using words I don't like and shit! tryinng to put down the workin' man.

yeh :|
 

JJChicken

Diamond Member
Apr 9, 2007
6,165
16
81
Originally posted by: Perknose
Let's not lose sight of the fact that employing certain words and phrases whilst posting is not necessarily emblematic of pretension qua pretense, but rather speaks to the very core of eschewing obfuscation through assiduous exactitude, a pursuit which lends a certain "je ne sais quoi" air to one's utterances even as it has the almost inescapable secondary and even tertiary ramifications of arousing the ire, nay, the dander and high dudgeon of the responding exemplars of the lumpenproletariat and other such (sniff) ilk.

I hold that to claim otherwise is, with all due respect, patently preposterous and leaves one poised on the precipice of arrant tomfoolery.

Thread mutherfucking closed.