Trump ethics. You actually said those words together."Its ok to beat your wife, if you buy her a house"
IMO this is the Trump mantra both metaphorically and literally.
Tell me why I'm wrong.
Trump ethics. You actually said those words together.
What? The Trump droves aren't chomping at the bit to gush about the ethics Trump lives by? How can that be? Shouldn't they have atleast 20 [hysterical] things to say at the ready? Is it possible they've been so busy defending him they haven't bothered to figure out why they do? Whaaaat?
My favorite headline today is ~Trump met with Stormy Daniels to share the gospel~ I doubt very seriously he managed to even work an 'Oh God' from her.
But shouldn't that be what they jump on this thread to praise? No it wouldn't be anything ethical they'd be full pom-poms cheerleading but do they even know the difference?Well, ya see, Trump having no ethics, conscience or morality is exactly what his supporters like about him. They absolutely adore him for the problems he's wreaking on the nation because his supporters see him doing it as some kind of revenge, a biblically inspired retribution on the system that betrayed them, that turned their backs on them, that sowed the seeds of hell on earth and they are cheering him on for it at every rally he manages to muster. These are the same folks that look at the destitute in need of help and accuse them of not having any sense of personal responsibility.
Between the racists, KKK, Nazis and evangelicals who practically call the shots from the base Trump clings to along with that mysterious grip that Putin has over him and the vice that Mueller is squeezing him in, Trump has trapped himself in a deep dark place with nothing to get him out of it except what's gotten him into it to begin with. He's running out of time and maneuvering room to play the wicked game he is notoriously known for. His supporters know this but choose to remain in the fantasy land that Trump lured them into.
So be it.
Are you sure it isn’t Fox running the State? It seems like they’re running Trump.Let us not forget the influence State Run Fox and Friends has on him as well.
I think it's a vicious circle jerk/snake eating its own tail kind of thing. They pick up the slack for one another when stupid doesn't reach the pinnacle with one of them. I'm assuming there's a lot of There's Something About Mary gel moments with the lot of them. So much dumb, so much cum.Are you sure it isn’t Fox running the State? It seems like they’re running Trump.
And all along I was thinking that he learned from his racist father.Trump learned everything he knows about ethics from Roy Cohn.
https://www.vanityfair.com/news/2017/06/donald-trump-roy-cohn-relationship
I do know if he did he wouldn't care. This is the same guy who wouldn't care if he shot someone on the street because his sycophants will still cheer him on.If he could, would trump give children bone cancer? Maybe? Probably not. He's similar but considerably more ethical and less capricious than the authoritarian abrahamic god his supporters follow.
How do you know that? Is it from that statement you're about to reference which actually doesn't support that claim, or somewhere else?I do know if he did he wouldn't care. This is the same guy who wouldn't care if he shot someone on the street because his sycophants will still cheer him on.
Does showing the happiness of your supporters after you've just killed someone indicate any level of caring?How do you know that? Is it from that statement you're about to reference which actually doesn't support that claim, or somewhere else?
If there was even a single dollar to be made by doing so? Yes, Trump would give bone cancer to children but then he'd jump on Twitter to call them losers for getting bone cancer. He likes kids who don't get bone cancer. LOL, just kidding... If that's what it takes to get rid of kids all together, fine.If he could, would trump give children bone cancer? Maybe? Probably not. He's similar but considerably more ethical and less capricious than the authoritarian abrahamic god his supporters follow.
Not indicating a level of caring isn't the same thing as "wouldn't care." It's because this sense is uncommon that I point it out.Does showing the happiness of your supporters after you've just killed someone indicate any level of caring?
Use your common sense now.
Not caring isn't the same thing as wouldn't care? Sounds pretty close to me.Not indicating a level of caring isn't the same thing as "wouldn't care." It's because this sense is uncommon that I point it out.
Not indicating a level of caring isn't the same as not caring. The problem is that it can sound close. Well spotted.Not caring isn't the same thing as wouldn't care? Sounds pretty close to me.