• We’re currently investigating an issue related to the forum theme and styling that is impacting page layout and visual formatting. The problem has been identified, and we are actively working on a resolution. There is no impact to user data or functionality, this is strictly a front-end display issue. We’ll post an update once the fix has been deployed. Thanks for your patience while we get this sorted.

My f'd up Dean of Students office

SarcasticDwarf

Diamond Member
So a few weeks ago I wrote this in response to the lame parking ticket I got. For it, I had a conference with an Assistant Dean of Students. Her office was rather rude in talking with me, which kinda annoyed me. The person I spoke with wasn't too bad. Anyway, I got a letter in today about it.

Part of their letter to me:

This letter will confirm our conference on May 10, 2004 in regard to the April 25th, 2004 incident in which it was alleged that you were present in South Scott Hall in violation of your restriction. You acknowledged that the allegations are true.

It is my finding that the allegations are true. You are being cited from the UW Oshkosh 2003-2004 Student Discipline Code under UWS 17.03(6) and 18.06(3).

??????


My letter to the Dean of Students:






My letter of response:

May 12th, 2004



<snip>

Dear James;

On May 12, 2004, I received a letter from Terri Gohmann (see attachment). In the letter mentioned, she makes the following statements which I believe to be untrue:

1) ??it was alleged that you were present in South Scott Hall??
I have never been in either of the Scott halls. I request to view/hear any evidence showing me to be in that building.
2) ??in violation of your restriction.?
To the best of my knowledge, I have no restrictions in place. I request to see all University records regarding any past or present restrictions in place for myself.
3) ?You acknowledged that the allegations are true.?
I have not acknowledged the above allegations to be true. Furthermore, I have never heard the above allegations. Because of this, I request the following:
a) Any evidence showing me to have acknowledged the above allegations to be true.
b) Evidence showing the above allegations were shown to me.
4) ??under UWS 17.03(6) and 18.06(3).?
UWS 17.03(6) states (from the UW Oshkosh 2003-2004 Student Discipline Code) ?For acts which violate the provisions of ch. UWS 18, Conduct on University Lands.?

UWS 18.06(3) states (from the UW Oshkosh 2003-2004 Student Discipline Code) ?Prohibited acts. No person may remove, destroy, or molest any bird, animal or fish life within the university lands except as authorized by the chief administrative officer or except when this provision conflicts with a special order of the department of natural resources.?

I deny committing any acts listed under UWS 18.06(3) and request to view any evidence of the above acts.


Due to the inconsistencies mentioned above, I feel I necessary to request a meeting with yourself, the Dean of Students, or another University representative at or above your level. If the issues above have not been resolved by May 18th, 2004, I will request a hearing before the nonacademic misconduct hearing committee.

As it is near the end of the semester and I will not be living on the campus during the interim, I have included both my current contact information (effective until Friday, May 14th, 2004) and my summer contact information.

<snip>


Thank you for you assistance,



<snip>
 
Originally posted by: virtueixi
I hope all that trouble is worth the little laugh you got out of that check. GL.

The conference I probably deserved, but this letter they sent me is messed up, they accuse me of things I never did and claim I admitted to it. I have NEVER been in those building mentioned. I have only been within 50 yards of them ONCE in my entire life. If their office had not been so rude, I probably would not have done this, but oh well.
 
Originally posted by: virtueixi
I hope all that trouble is worth the little laugh you got out of that check. GL.

Us getting a good laugh out of all of this is pretty worth it.
 
Well let's see here. You could've paid the $8 without a fuss, and been on with your life.

Or, you could've taken the a**hole approach, which you did.
Why don't I feel sorry for you at all?

In life you have to know when to fight your battles, and well, this wasn't one of those times. Whatever frustration and problems you have because of being an a**hole, you deserve.

Did I mention you're also a hypocrite "Her office was rather rude in talking with me, which kinda annoyed me."
Let's see what the check said again "get a life. some a**hole gave me a ticket. thanks alot."
 
Originally posted by: BigJ
Well let's see here. You could've paid the $8 without a fuss, and been on with your life.

Or, you could've taken the a**hole approach, which you did.
Why don't I feel sorry for you at all?

In life you have to know when to fight your battles, and well, this wasn't one of those times. Whatever frustration and problems you have because of being an a**ehole, you deserve.

Did I mention you're also a hypocrite "Her office was rather rude in talking with me, which kinda annoyed me."
Let's see what the check said again "get a life. some a**hole gave me a ticket. thanks alot."





This letter has nothing to do with the ticket, this letter is about their office screwing something up royally.
 
Originally posted in the first thread by: DeathByAnts
Originally posted in the first thread by: mflacy
That's some unoriginal crap. Put some thought into it if you are going to be vulgar.

Perhaps "The best $8.00 BJ I've ever had! Thanks Parking Attendant Smith"

Come on now, that would actually get me in trouble.

Well it's a good thing you stayed out of trouble!
 
Originally posted by: mflacy
Originally posted in the first thread by: DeathByAnts
Originally posted in the first thread by: mflacy
That's some unoriginal crap. Put some thought into it if you are going to be vulgar.

Perhaps "The best $8.00 BJ I've ever had! Thanks Parking Attendant Smith"

Come on now, that would actually get me in trouble.

Well it's a good thing you stayed out of trouble!

relatively, I did

My letter of response above is not rude and does not imply anything. I simply want to knoww where they are getting all these ideas about me molesting animals and such.
 
You make it alot of work to figure out what's going on. How long is the letter that you couldn't post the entire thing?
 
Originally posted by: sygyzy
You make it alot of work to figure out what's going on. How long is the letter that you couldn't post the entire thing?

not too long. I suppose I could type most of it in. 1 moment...

edit: done
 
Way to fight the man! 🙂

Your letter sounds like a response to request for interrogatories (things lawyers do in discovery that is boring as hell).
 
Originally posted by: axelfox
Way to fight the man! 🙂

Your letter sounds like a response to request for interrogatories (things lawyers do in discovery that is boring as hell).

You should try summary judgements.
 
Originally posted by: axelfox
Way to fight the man! 🙂

Your letter sounds like a response to request for interrogatories (things lawyers do in discovery that is boring as hell).


That's what happens when you read too many responses to SCO's litigation.
 
Originally posted by: Kelvrick
Originally posted by: axelfox
Way to fight the man! 🙂

Your letter sounds like a response to request for interrogatories (things lawyers do in discovery that is boring as hell).

You should try summary judgements.

I think interrogatories are even worse than summary judgments.
 
Back
Top